SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

LA Times: "Civilian Killings Went Unpunished"

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:23 pm    Post subject: LA Times: "Civilian Killings Went Unpunished" Reply with quote

BOHICA fellow Vietnam Vets...the assault commences anew...

Quote:
VIETNAM: THE WAR CRIMES FILES
Civilian Killings Went Unpunished
Declassified papers show U.S. atrocities went far beyond My Lai.
By Nick Turse and Deborah Nelson, Special to The Times
August 6, 2006

The men of B Company were in a dangerous state of mind. They had lost five men in a firefight the day before. The morning of Feb. 8, 1968, brought unwelcome orders to resume their sweep of the countryside, a green patchwork of rice paddies along Vietnam's central coast.

They met no resistance as they entered a nondescript settlement in Quang Nam province. So Jamie Henry, a 20-year-old medic, set his rifle down in a hut, unfastened his bandoliers and lighted a cigarette.

Just then, the voice of a lieutenant crackled across the radio. He reported that he had rounded up 19 civilians, and wanted to know what to do with them. Henry later recalled the company commander's response:

Kill anything that moves.

Henry stepped outside the hut and saw a small crowd of women and children. Then the shooting began.

Moments later, the 19 villagers lay dead or dying.

Back home in California, Henry published an account of the slaughter and held a news conference to air his allegations. Yet he and other Vietnam veterans who spoke out about war crimes were branded traitors and fabricators. No one was ever prosecuted for the massacre.

Now, nearly 40 years later, declassified Army files show that Henry was telling the truth — about the Feb. 8 killings and a series of other atrocities by the men of B Company.

The files are part of a once-secret archive, assembled by a Pentagon task force in the early 1970s, that shows that confirmed atrocities by U.S. forces in Vietnam were more extensive than was previously known.

The documents detail 320 alleged incidents that were substantiated by Army investigators — not including the most notorious U.S. atrocity, the 1968 My Lai massacre.

Though not a complete accounting of Vietnam war crimes, the archive is the largest such collection to surface to date. About 9,000 pages, it includes investigative files, sworn statements by witnesses and status reports for top military brass.

LA Times - cont'd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting that they can list viewing some "9,000" pages, yet, post so few pdf files along with the story, and only what supports their view.

Still, in viewing what little they do supply, I did not notice allegations of the routine atrocities claimed by sKerry before the Fulbright anti-war committee.

No one has ever claimed that atrocities never occurred, but they were hardly a day-to-day event as often claimed by the anti-war left. Had stronger prosecutions and sentences been meted out, who knows, it just may have ended up with many of the anti-war left's heroes themselves being the one's still sitting in prison instead of leading the charge to slander our troops.

The anti-war left may feel this vindicates them, but to me, it just further reveals them as the hypocrites they are.

I am still awaiting the expose' of all the World War Two atrocities committed and see how they slander and malign the "Greatest Generation."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dusty
Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 1264
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems to me like up until and including WWII it was understood that during war a lot of people got killed. And not only soldiers but anyone who was on the 'other' side. It was also understood that war brings on an 'altered state of reality' for those engaged in actually doing the killing hence the unspeakable remained just that, unspoken.
Then after WWII we had meetings and drafted these 'rules' like in a boxing match that everyone is supposed to follow to make war more 'civilized'.
Of course those rules require that people go against and control their natural urges and emotions during the course of battle especially when the 'other' side ignores these rules.
Thing is, that is just not an obtainable goal for a large number of people put in the situation of witnessing the deaths of many of their friends and countrymen.
In boxing matches rules make sense, in bar fights they do not. In war they have no place either. In attempting to make war more 'civilized' we make war more 'acceptable'.
IMHO anyway.

Dusty
_________________
Left and Wrong are the opposite of Right!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

320 "alleged" incidents over a 10 year period during which, I'd estimate, some 300,000 American troops (using 10% of those who served there and 58,000 on the wall?) may have participated in direct combat operations? How does this translate into an assertion of systemic, day-to-day, willful employment of such conduct?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deuce
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 589
Location: FL

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was almost intrigued by the LA spin machine, right up til:

Quote:
"Abuses were not confined to a few rogue units, a Los Angeles Times review of the files found. They were uncovered in every Army division that operated in Vietnam." (ed. from the 'other' article)


Ummm, since most of us vets were in Army divisions where there were NO abuses, we can clearly see where they've decided to Ratherize the news all over again. ( I use Ratherize instead of Cronkitize, 'cause I give old Walt the benefit of the doubt since he's a sailor)

If the sKerry spin machine has decided to smear all vets again, I just can't believe this country won't see thru it ...or was the last 4 years just a 'good' dream! 320 alleged war crimes resulting in the 22 convicted/court martialed guilty parties does not a systemic day to day massacre reminiscent of Jinghis Khan make.

I like to think that I'm not too optimistic in this regard...but, Lurch really has to shut his pie hole soon for his own sanity...and Lew, you're spot on!
The day sKerry and his friend Bangert show us the 'skin', we really need to help them into their straight jackets!

Deuce
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carpro
Admin


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 1176
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
320 "alleged" incidents over a 10 year period during which, I'd estimate, some 300,000 American troops (using 10% of those who served there and 58,000 on the wall?) may have participated in direct combat operations? How does this translate into an assertion of systemic, day-to-day, willful employment of such conduct?


Is this, perhaps, a pre-emptive attack on behalf of Kerry's coming candidacy to legitimize his anti war stance and acts of treason?
_________________
"If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

carpro wrote:
Is this, perhaps, a pre-emptive attack on behalf of Kerry's coming candidacy to legitimize his anti war stance and acts of treason?


Perhaps (and Lew made note in another thread). But, after a bit more reflection, I think this is much, much bigger than rehabilitating the fraudulent and already-marginalized John Kerry. This is a skirmish in the war over who will, in the final analysis, write the history of the Vietnam era.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
This is a skirmish in the war over who will, in the final analysis, write the history of the Vietnam era.

Me#1You#10,
You are so right. If you root around the internet (www.civilweek.com for starters) you can find genuine letters, military dispatches and newpaper articles (both north & south in equal proportions) that were written during the Civil War. If for example you read the account of the same battle or action from both sides, it is easy to remove both biases and get down to what really happened. Very quickly you will see that what the history books teach has very little to do with the actual events as described by eyewitnesses and participants. I fear that the Vietnam War history will suffer the same fate.
_________________
Swift Boats - Qui Nhon (12/69-4/70), Cat Lo (4/70-5/70), Vung Tau (5/70-12/71)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I fear that the Vietnam War history will suffer the same fate.


Unfortunately, it already has, ever since we tucked tail and ran in 1973.

Several have tried to set the record straight and sites have been set-up to set the record straight.

It would appear that the left is so bent on preserving their warped view of what we were doing there that they will willingly sell out all, including those who survived and fled the country after the Commuist takeover in 1975.

In many regards, they are repeating this in the WoT, especially Iraq today.

As an example, when discussing the Viet Nam War and the effects of the anti-war ninnies had on it, I brought out that General Vo Ngyuen Giap, Defense Minister and Commanding General of the North Vietnamese Army, had said he was contemplating negotiating a surrender after his humiliating defeat in Tet of '68. What changed his mind was hearing Walter Cronkite declare he was victorious in offensive and then seeing the anti-war left protesting. He then knew where our weak link was and played to it.

The reply? "Well, that's one mans opinion."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fortdixlover
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 1476

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The documents detail 320 alleged incidents that were substantiated by Army investigators

"320 incidents" out of a long multi-year war over an entire country? Golly gee....

That's actually an amazingly good record in the annals of warfare. Something to be proud of, in historical context. Say - when compared to the history of what John Kerry and Jane Fonda's friends, the communists, did to their native populations when the US left. How's 2 million atrocities for ya, LA Times, with skulls, not papers, as evidence?

Hell, there are more than 320 atrocities committed every YEAR in a major US city such as LA, Chicago or other liberal-left socialist utopia -see http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004902.html .

The left keeps moving the goal post in its never-ending quest to tear down western culture. In doing so, the lack of culture and civilization of their pet group gets a pass.

I hope all the Swiftvets are aware of the mainstream media (aka obsolete media) meltdown over Reuters doctoring and staging of photos from the Middle East to make the Jews look like killers and the Hizbollah terrorists like saints (see http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=21976_Reuters_on_the_Run and many other stories on the Web).

May I make a suggestion?

Tell the LA Times to go f*** themselves. That's about the only response necessary and appropriate.

-- FDL
_________________
"Millions For Defense, Not One Cent For Tribute" - Thomas Jefferson on paying ransom to Muslim corsairs (pirates).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There will always be criminal acts committed in war.
We had a draft in the Vietnam Era. This means that a cross section of US society was sent into war. It is reasonable to assume that the proportion of miscreants and criminally minded people within the population would also be present in the troops. Although every means available was used to weed out these people, some would always persist.
These are the same people who would commit crimes in civilian life. Now they were armed and sent into situations where opportunities to commit unnecessary violent acts would present themselves. It is amazing that there are only 320 documented incidents. I'll bet that there are at least that many criminal acts committed in the United States by a proportional part of our population.

By the way, didn't sKerry admit to one of these acts on TV in the 70s?
Shouldn't he be brought up on war crimes charges?
_________________
Swift Boats - Qui Nhon (12/69-4/70), Cat Lo (4/70-5/70), Vung Tau (5/70-12/71)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently Mr. Bush wants to extend immunity to many of our people. It would also eliminate the Abu Graib type humiliation events as a valid means to charge our people.
Quote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14236728/
Administration seeks to weaken war crimes law
The Bush administration has drafted amendments to a mid-90s war crimes law that would eliminate the risk of prosecution for political appointees, CIA officers and former military personnel for humiliating or degrading war prisoners, according to U.S. officials and a copy of the amendments.
... Left off the list would be what the Geneva Conventions refer to as "outrages upon [the] personal dignity" of a prisoner and deliberately humiliating acts — such as the forced nakedness, use of dog leashes and wearing of women's underwear seen at the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq — that fall short of torture.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14236728/

Way to go! Thank you Mr. Bush.
They need to go one step further though. This law is for civilians and former military. The military equivalent needs to be put into place to protect our people serving on active duty, but this is a step in the right direction.
_________________
Swift Boats - Qui Nhon (12/69-4/70), Cat Lo (4/70-5/70), Vung Tau (5/70-12/71)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group