SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Stay on Message!!!
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
middleroad
Former Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 6:14 pm    Post subject: Stay on Message!!! Reply with quote

Maybe this is one of those cases where those who watch a debate come up with different conclusions than those who READ the debate. I just read the entire transcript here on this site, and I think you should remove it because it's not helping the cause. O'Neill basically avoided the issues, i.e. war crimes as defined by Geneva vs. the more sensational stuff, Vietnamization, etc., at all costs and kept returning, returning, returning to the fact that Kerry doesn't represent 2 1/2 million vets. I suppose people can't debate an issue where other people are involved without explicitly conditioning every statement with "In my experience...". Of course O'Neill doesn't do this either, and Kerry calls him on it. Also, I thought it was particularly funny, er, unfortunate when he challenges Kerry to produce a veteran who is willing to testify to war crimes, then backs off immediately to home-base position (ok, now produce 2 1/2 million witnesses...) when Kerry calls his bluff. I'm relieved to hear that when viewing this episode O'Neill comes off as professional, though. It's hard to imagine given the snide remarks and repeated attempts to cut off both Kerry and the moderator at nearly every break.javascript:emoticon('Laughing')
Laughing

Here's the deal. Keep attacking Kerry's Vietnam record. This strategy is obviously working, and we're all result-oriented people here, right? So avoid talking about whether Vietnam was actually a winnable war, let alone a good idea, and instead talk about whether or not bullets were flying while Kerry dragged his comrade onto the boat 30 years ago. Also above all, avoid talking about the current war but instead keep clinging to and promulgating the notion that it's not possible to protest a war without being unpatriotic. This is good stuff, even if it makes the head spin a little. Stay on message!javascript:emoticon('Rolling Eyes')
Rolling Eyes

History has shown, and the intelligent among you know, that Vietnam was a waste of money and human beings, and indeed systematic violations of the Geneva convention did take place. Most importantly, a clear distinction could and can be made between protesting a war and deriding those who participate in it bravely and with good intentions. Unfortunately both happened 30 years ago. Only the former is happening this time around, try as the Right might to smear the movement with the latter. And yes, this war is a colossal waste.javascript:emoticon('Crying or Very sad')
Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leeinwv
PO3


Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Posts: 268

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the swiftvets have done their work well enough

They can decide what they want to do
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rb325th
Admiral


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 1334

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

History has shown that the Anti-War demonstrators of the 60s and 70s are largely responsible for the Loss of the Vietnam War, a War in wich we had won every single battle with the enenmey, a War that after Tet the North was in a hopless state after squandering much of its Military might, a War in wich our Servicemen fought with Honor, Integrity and compassion. The North knew they could hold on and win because of one major reason, that the U.S. Public through the efforts of the Anti_War crowd was steadily buying into their propaganda of incredible atrocoties, the futility of the War, the lack of desire of the people of the South to remain free of communism. This lost the War as the politicians had to aquiesce to the public demands to halt the War. This resulted in hundreds of thousands of Refugees from the South as well as many more killed by the Communist after their takeover.
Veterans of the Vietnam War as well as all Veterans who have seen the betrayal of John Kerry to his fellow fighting men have not just the right to be mad at him, but also an obligation to expose him for his providing aid and comfort to the enemey of the United States at a time of War!
Had he done that in past days I would venture a guess he would not be running for anything and his days thereafter would not have been of luxury and a member of the Government.
Our men returned home to ridicule from the Anti-War crowd, defamation of character, and a sense of betrayal by their Nation and fellow man!
Even now we have groups of Anti_War Protestors who do the same thing, use the same tactics and some are sympathetic to our enemey and gladly spread their propaganda. (Go to a protest someday and you will see the sympathizers of the mid-east Terrorist organisations)
You, sir/madam need to educate yourself better on what it is John Kerry has done, and what it is we face today with the War on Terror. As well as the actions of many of the Anti_War crowd.
_________________
U.S. Army 1983-1995, 11C1P/11H2P NBTDT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Middleroad (more like left of middle), your analysis of O'Neill and Vietnam in general is sorely lacking.

Cavetts audience started off on Kerry's side, yet were siding more with O'Neill at the end.

You say history has shown Vietnam was a waste of money and human beings, but you fail to address the millions of unnecessary deaths as a result of America abandoning it. Aren't they also a waste? History is written by the victors and in this case, it was the anti-war peaceniks and socialists, guided by the Soviet Union, that prevailed. Of course they are going to say it was a waste. However, since Vietnam is one of the things that helped bring about the demise of the Soviet Union, it's hardly a waste.

You also fail to mention John Kerry's use of phoney veterans to back up his charges of war crimes commited, as exposed in several books and by an investigation by Naval Investigative services, as ordered by the Congress.

You also fail to recognize that not only did John Kerry abandon his Swift Boat crews, to make a run for Congress unsuccessfully, I might add, he also abandoned his anti-war "band of brothers" with alignment with them proved disadvantageous to his career. He then reverted back to "war hero" in the early 80's.

If you really wish to question the Swift vets and support John Kerry, may I first suggest you bring your head back out into the daylight and actually research what John Kerry is really all about. It sure isn't doing anything to benefit you.
_________________
Clark County Conservative
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coldwarvet
Admiral


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1125
Location: Minnetonka, MN

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Get on one side or the other or be run over.
_________________
Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.

"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto

USAF 75-79 Security Police
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good points all of you, thank you.

This seems to be a hit and run. Confused
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hammer2
PO2


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 387
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rb325th wrote:
History has shown that the Anti-War demonstrators of the 60s and 70s are largely responsible for the Loss of the Vietnam War, a War in wich we had won every single battle with the enenmey, a War that after Tet the North was in a hopless state after squandering much of its Military might, a War in wich our Servicemen fought with Honor, Integrity and compassion. The North knew they could hold on and win because of one major reason, that the U.S. Public through the efforts of the Anti_War crowd was steadily buying into their propaganda of incredible atrocoties, the futility of the War, the lack of desire of the people of the South to remain free of communism. This lost the War as the politicians had to aquiesce to the public demands to halt the War. This resulted in hundreds of thousands of Refugees from the South as well as many more killed by the Communist after their takeover.
Veterans of the Vietnam War as well as all Veterans who have seen the betrayal of John Kerry to his fellow fighting men have not just the right to be mad at him, but also an obligation to expose him for his providing aid and comfort to the enemey of the United States at a time of War!
Had he done that in past days I would venture a guess he would not be running for anything and his days thereafter would not have been of luxury and a member of the Government.
Our men returned home to ridicule from the Anti-War crowd, defamation of character, and a sense of betrayal by their Nation and fellow man!
Even now we have groups of Anti_War Protestors who do the same thing, use the same tactics and some are sympathetic to our enemey and gladly spread their propaganda. (Go to a protest someday and you will see the sympathizers of the mid-east Terrorist organisations)
You, sir/madam need to educate yourself better on what it is John Kerry has done, and what it is we face today with the War on Terror. As well as the actions of many of the Anti_War crowd.


Exactly, well said.

Here is a link to an excerpt of "Masters of Deceit" by J. Edgar Hoover.
The book was published in 1958 and is a detailed exposure of Communist methods to fool the public. Read it for yourself and see how relevant it is to today!
http://www.zpub.com/notes/masters.html

If anyone can find a link to the text of the entire book, we need to get it posted for everyone to read.
_________________
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilence" - Thomas Jefferson
"An armed society is a polite society" - Thomas Jefferson
"The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it won't be needed until someone tries to take it away." -- Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BB Stacker
Seaman


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 150
Location: Eustis Fl

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's obvious Muddyroad..er... Middleroad is trying to focus the discussion in the least damaging way for Kerry. I guess they're giving up on outright denial. Don't try to confuse him with facts. Facts are for people who honestly want to know the truth. Those trying to influence the discussion to their own political purposes will try to divert through sophistry. Their only ally is ignorance, and this site is dedicated to the removal of ignorance not the enhancement of it.

Keep up the good work all you SBVT's and supporters. You continue to inspire.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Middleroad,

If you are really interested in learning the truth, may I suggest that you ready the post by Adam Yoshida at http://www.adamyoshida.com/2004/08/kerrys-dolchstoss.html ?

Perhaps you will be able tgo make up your mind.
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
middleroad
Former Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:45 pm    Post subject: Easy now... Reply with quote

(Deleted by Admin)

Admin note:

This forum was designed to facilitate the discussion of the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth strong conviction that John Kerry is unfit to serve as Commander-In-Chief.

If your defense of John Kerry can only be couched in rhetoric denigrating the fitness of another candidate, then we suggest that you find another venue for that expression.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:54 pm    Post subject: Re: Easy now... Reply with quote

Quote:
Removed quoted troll material.


You think this is middle-of-the-road?
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipher
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 902

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Removed quoted troll material.


I thought you read this entire site. If so, you'd know that it's not about who's in power NOW, it's about ensuring it's NOT Kerry in the future.

I have a feeling you have a date with long, cold, hard demise: one 35 years in the making.

See ya.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just another happy worker from Shipley's Donuts weighing....

I think every single one of their employees must be visiting this site.
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sevry
Commander


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 326

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Stay on Message!!! Reply with quote

middleroad wrote:
Maybe this is one of those cases where those who watch a debate come up with different conclusions than those who READ the debate. I just read the entire transcript here on this site, and I think you should remove it because it's not helping the cause. O'Neill basically avoided the issues


If the issue is who-lost-Vietnam, it's not difficult to see. Walter Cronkite took pleasure in saying he stopped the war, and consequently killed thousands of Vietnamese in the bloodbath which followed.

People like to use the acrostic, MSM, for mainstream media. But it's not mainstream in the sense of honestly reflecting the good sense of America. The majority can be wrong, at times. The Constitution allows for this. But a bitter minority, or even 'fifth column', can be wrong most of the time, intentionally and destructively so. There's nothing mainstream about the media, about academia, arts and entertainment to include tv and the music biz, and of course the art world itself, various corporations, a host of think tanks with talking heads for the tv, or the Democrat Party, with respect to all those Democrats who support or are Swift Vets. It's a leftwing 'mainstream', that is which calls itself mainstream and insists others do, as well. It's not. And it's not just the press and television.

They continue in full force, today. But today they are challenged at every turn. O'Neill can seem buoyed by the coverage of the Washington Post. But it wasn't the Post that broke the story, but rather tried to cover it up. Validation is never going to be had from the LM. It's the fool's errand to hope that they will eventually promote a message they believe is contrary to their destructive and self-destructive agenda.

But in the late 1960s, they were unchallenged, and Americans were naive and trusting of the LM. Walter Cronkite was the 'trusted uncle'. These had been the war reporters, after all. WWII-mania would have been particularly strong in the early 60s, even for Korea - the 'forgotten' war. How dare one criticize the LM, in other words. And they took that trust, and abused it, and turned it on people with such seeming coordination that the MOST TRUSTED VOICES of society, in the late 1960s, turned to oppose and undermine our own national security and cost thousands and thousands of people their lives through a policy of cooperating with the enemy and disseminating its propaganda.

That's not happening, today. Well, it is. But it's not belng believed. There is still the core, perhaps, of elderly who trust the LM as 'war reporters' from the 40s. There are the bitter Michael Moorists who are almost sneeringly at war with America, itself. Again, with respect, there is the Democrat Party almost wholely owned as another agency of the LM. But that core is no longer the majority of Americans. And it's no thanks to the Washington Post, frankly. It because of the Swift Vets, and their appearances on conservative talk radio, their support on conservative websites, and on 'weblogs' of assorted political leaning, even the spotty coverage of FOX where the alphab's froze them out along with the 'magazines and newspapers of record'. If this had been the situation in the late 60s, there would have been 'freepers' on the Washington Mall, and people would have laughed at protestors getting 'theirs' at the Democrat's Convention in '68. Instead, too many were unnerved and destabilized in their innocence. And today couldn't have happened, then, because today is the result of thinking about then. People were fooled by those at war with America. Not so many, now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
msindependent
Vice Admiral


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 891
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh dear, it's time for me to send more money to the SwiftVets.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group