| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:21 pm Post subject: Kerry would allow Iran to retain its nuclear facilities |
 |
|
Kerry and EU would offer Iran a nuclear deal
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_5.html
Just what we need, a bunch of flaming fanatics with nukes.
We have to stop Kerry. It's more important than ever.
Last edited by BuffaloJack on Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:19 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nathanyl
PO3
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 280
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm sure it'd work just as well as Clinton's deal with N. Korea did. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FF1047
Lieutenant
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 222
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:00 pm Post subject: explain ... |
|
|
Someone explain to me why a Middle Eastern country with oil reserves needs Nuclear Power plants ... to let them retain them in any form is foolish ... I live in NYC and will consider leaving if Kerry gets elected, I can't risk my wife like that ... It won't be a handful of buildings next time ...
_________________
JJC
USNA class of 1980 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zinfella
Rear Admiral
Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Location: Mesa, Az
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kerry and EU would offer Iran a nuclear deal
Sure, and if Iran didn't do exactly as John F-ing Kerry says, then F-ing would report them to the UN! Boy, that'll learn 'em!!!!!!!!!
_________________
No whiners! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
msindependent
Vice Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 891
Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm guessing Israel will take them out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zinfella
Rear Admiral
Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Location: Mesa, Az
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:16 pm Post subject: Re: explain ... |
|
|
| FF1047 wrote: | | Someone explain to me why a Middle Eastern country with oil reserves needs Nuclear Power plants ... to let them retain them in any form is foolish ... |
Because nuclear power produces cheaper electricity, and they can sell the oil for more money than they spend on nuclear power. Then there's the part about an unlimited fuel source for nuclear power as opposed to the fossil fuels used in other types of power plants. When oil becomes scarce, the price will be astronomical, but nuclear fuel costs won't be effected by that. Even making oil from coal is a very expensive process. I know of an oil field that produces 100,000 barrels a day, and using oil to produce enough power to run the entire operation claims 50,000 of those barrels. The site is now using thermal energy to run the place, and that's the next panacea for power production. But it's not without some problems, and can't begin to compete with nuclear power in cost and effeciency.
Nobody in their right mind would be comfortable with Iran having any degree of nuclear capabilities. Having John F-ing Kerry in charge of our foreign policy would be an unending nightmare.
_________________
No whiners! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
larrygj
Seaman
Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 166
Location: Newcastle, Washington
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | "At the end of the day [Bush officials] can argue all they want about their policies," Edwards said. "But the test is: Have they worked? And Iran is further along in developing a nuclear weapon than they were when George Bush came into office." |
Let's see. So if Gore had won, Iran would now not be where it is in developing nuclear weapons, is that it? One thing we know for sure. Saddam would also be now about where Iran is, if not further. John Boy, to answer your question: Yes, Bush's polices have worked. I know you're pinning your hopes on America's failure abroad, but it ain't happening.
Kerry's idea of negotiating with Iran's Islamic fanatics, especially the same ones who held our Marines and embassy workers hostage in 1979 (despite Jimmy Carter's sensitive foreign policy) until Ronald Reagan was elected, is breathlessly naive. He is getting this from the Clinton playbook on how he dealt with North Korea and its nuclear weapons program ("let's see if we can bribe these guys"), and we saw how well that worked.
More evidence, may I say, of how Kerry is unfit for command.
Larry |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim T.
Seaman Recruit
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 43
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is great.
The next proposal we hear from the John-John's will revolve around sending some of those nice upstanding environmentalist protestors they have in New York City this week over to Tehran to convince them how bad and dangerous nuclear energy is. That should do it.
This is what is called the "nuanced intellectual" approach.
_________________
"And we will tell the terrorists, we will win and you will lose" and hope to hell they believe me.-John Kerry |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
USWORHOCKEY
Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 94
Location: NJ
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Carter screwed up our situation with Iran when he blinked, showed weakness. jk will make it a devistating mess. What the unfortunite thing is enlistment will drop, nobody will re-enlist, and jk wants to expand our sf. He has no clue that that will ultimately weaken us..More isn't always better, if it was that easy everyone would be. Just a thought...
_________________
NEVER RELENT WHEN THE ENEMY IS ON THE RUN!
3 generations of soldiers in family....... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buffman
LCDR
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 437
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
If for some strange reason, Kerry does win, I would pray that George Bush would do the right thing and take out those reactors before Kerry assumes office.
_________________
Never Ever Give Up
America First |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
