SwiftVets.com

Vernon · Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:06 pm Post subject: Charge of Treason

Has anyone considered filing charges of treason against John Kerry (aka Skerry)? What would it take? Who could do it?

Though I am only a Nam era veteran, as former Air Force I have felt the humiliation of his absurd charges and seriously believe he should be charged with treason and/or perjury. Question

MOCitizenForTruth · Seaman Recruit Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 12

Are you refering to Treason for his lying in his testimony or for his meetings in Paris with the enemy?

Vernon · Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:29 pm Post subject:

There is no question that his action gave aid and comfort to the enemy. There is more than adequate evidence that his testimony was perjured as well as the fact there was collusion to give false testimony... that IS fact!

My question is related to whether or not anyone has considered legal action against him, whether or not it is possible and how would it be done.

Vernon

Navy_Navy_Navy · Admin Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777

sbu_21412 you've done an incredibly good job of displaying your ignorance in your history of posts.

We've removed the worst of them, fortunately for you.

Read. Listen. Ask more questions and drop fewer (zero is a good number) Kerry and leftist talking points.

You just might learn something.
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother

Maereta · Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 2:23 am Post subject: charge of treason

There is a petition available at http://www.patriotpetitions.us/Kerry/
They currently have 150,000 signatures. Check it out

ocsparky101 · Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:37 am Post subject: charges

I have written a letter to the Department of Defense asking them that same question particularly in regards to the Paris meeting and the Conspiracy to commit murder. Maybe with enough pressure from Americans they will do something.

Vernon · Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:10 pm Post subject: Re: charges

Vernon · Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:13 pm Post subject: Re: charge of treason

cocacolab · Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 7:16 pm Post subject: TREASON

JOHN KERRY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE EVEN A SENATOR IF THE CONSTITUTION IS STILL BEING FOLLOWED. NOT BECAUSE OF HIS TESTIMONY BUT THE FACT THAT IF HE WAS STILL UNDER OATH AS A MILITARY OFFICER WHILE HE WAS INSIGHTING AN INSURGENCY OR REBELLION AGAINST THIS COUNTRY HE HAS NO RIGHT TO BE A SENATOR,CONGRESSMAN, OR PRES. OR V. PRESIDENT. CAN SOMEONE CHECK ON THE AMENDMENTS AND I THINK IT IS SECTION 3 OF THE 4TH OR 14 AMENDMENT AND SEE IF THIS IS HOW IT IS STATED. ACCORDING TO HIS WEB PAGE HE WASN'T DISCHARGED FROM THE NAVAL RESERVE UNTIL FEB. 10, 1972. HE JOINED THE MILITANTS VIETNAM VETS AGAINST THE WAR IN JUNE, 197O AND DIDN'T QUIT UNTIL 11/10/1971. I THINK THAT WOULD PUT HIM IN THE TRAITOR CATAGORY FOR SURE
BJ KATH[/b]
_________________
Barbara J. Kath

Misty · Lieutenant Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 223

cocacolab · Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:31 am Post subject:

the thing is he doesn't need to be tried for treason, he was in the military and went against the government he swore an oath to. it doesn't say in the constitution amendment 14 article 3 anything about war only that if one has taken an oath to his country and he engages in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof; it doesn't mean war has to be declared, he took the oath to this country and then turned against it. we need someone with some good legal skills to help out here. i think he is serving illegally and things just never came to light back then cause they just wanted things to settle. maybe no one even thought of looking at it this way. won't hurt to try. he sure has it coming after all he did.
_________________
Barbara J. Kath

Misty · Lieutenant Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 223

I agree. He had to sign an oath several times. Every time he changed his classification, etc. I didn't really keep up with the thread, but there is another one where this was discussed in good detail. Check it out to see what research has already been done.
_________________
Misty
----------
Dad was in the Navy Pacific Fleet
Brother was on the USS Regulus - Vietnam
Husband was AirForce 3rd (34th) Tactical Fighter Wing - Security Police Bien Hoa Vietnam

Stevie · Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:20 am Post subject:

we have lawyers on the forum... John O'Neill is a lawyer; If it could be done, I'm sure they would know and/or checked into it.

zinfella · Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:33 am Post subject:

Richard Nixon was lookung at John F-ing Kerry very hard, because of his anti war activities, and his testimony blackening the name of the US military. While I have no inside info one way or the other, I'd be very surprised if charges weren't considered long before now.

Further, there is the curiosity concerning F-ing's actual discharge date. It was way past what it should have been. So, did F-ing get nailed back then, delaying his discharge time becuase of punitive action? Another explanation for the late discharge date might be that he didn't get an honorable discharge, and later had it changed, effecting the date.

As much as I would love to see F-ing pay for what he did, charges at this time, may be out of the question. We can be sure that folks aside from the swiftees have had that thought. There may be an opportunity for charges over his lying about his record and awards. Treason, at this late date, is almost impossible to hang on him, even though he deserves it. While treason has no statute of limitations, it is one of the hardest to prove, and having some 30 years go by since he committed those acts, doesn't make it any easier.
_________________
No whiners!