View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sonar5 Seaman
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 167 Location: Caleeefornia
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjanay Ensign
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 51 Location: NY NY
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you zoom in on the "th" in the USA Today PDF you can see it is not actually superscripted.
This is a scanning or copying error. Its noise on the copy or a fold in the original.
Last edited by mjanay on Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
You GottaBeKidding Rear Admiral
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The font in the form is a standard 10-pitch typewriter font, Pica or something similar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azpatriot Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 593 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes it's bent download the jpg and zoom in on it, notice how it's bent with a dot ( probably from noise ) right under it. _________________ Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stacman Lt.Jg.
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 104
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know about you guys, but while I was in the military they were always about 8-10 years behind in the technology. If they even had selectrics then, I'd be surprised. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Z Rear Admiral
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 687 Location: West Hartford CT
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:34 pm Post subject: Official Bush documents |
|
|
When checking the link given by Dave L, there was a superscripted "th". But all these documents were typed using constant-width characters, not proportional characters, and they are not Times New Roman characters.
Why would Rufus Martin (or his secretary) be using an ordinary Courier-font typewriter, and Jerry Killian a Times New Roman typewriter? Are there other known (official) documents by Jerry Killian which could be analyzed for comparison?
If the other documents signed by Jerry Killian all use Courier font, it would look very suspicious that he would use a different typewriter just to type a memo to himself in his "file". _________________ The traitor will crater! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RobD Lt.Jg.
Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 147 Location: Reno Nv
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Check out the letter y Not even close--totally differnt type _________________ 6 Year Navy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hammondb3 Seaman Recruit
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's my question on the Superscript example.
If the 111th on line two was superscripted (as it appears it was) why were all of the other places where 111th appears on the page NOT? _________________ Think!, Man... Think! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ord33 Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 670 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If CBS uses this example of proof, people should just laugh at them. They are just digging deeper and deeper, especially listenting to Hannity, and what they did before the airing of 60 Minutes and Mr. Killian's son. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sonar5 Seaman
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 167 Location: Caleeefornia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hammondb3 wrote: | Here's my question on the Superscript example.
If the 111th on line two was superscripted (as it appears it was) why were all of the other places where 111th appears on the page NOT? |
ding...ding...ding..... _________________ Veteran-United States Marine Corps 1983-1989
My Home at AboutPolitics.net:
http://www.aboutpolitics.net/phpBB2/index.php
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
azpatriot Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 593 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hammondb3 wrote: | Here's my question on the Superscript example.
If the 111th on line two was superscripted (as it appears it was) why were all of the other places where 111th appears on the page NOT? |
Not to mention that there are other places that were not superscripted .... notice places with "st" _________________ Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
air_vet PO2
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 374
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mjanay wrote: | If you zoom in on the "th" in the USA Today PDF you can see it is not actually superscripted.
This is a scanning or copying error. Its noise on the copy or a fold in the original. |
I agree - FAX machines introduce all kinds of image artifacts - all the rest of the occurrences of 111th in the document are normal and the font is NOT variable spaced. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjanay Ensign
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 51 Location: NY NY
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can assure you if you could see the original, you'd see the "th" is either whiteouted a little, or backspaced, or its just fine and the scanner makes it look funny. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neverforget Vice Admiral
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 875
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even if Lt Col Killian would "not rate" it is because Lt Bush was in Alabama and he had no information from Alabama. So what? That doesn't mean Lt Bush did anything bad. It would be normal not to be able to rate. _________________ US Army Security Agency
1965-1971 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjanay Ensign
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 51 Location: NY NY
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The giveaway is that the top of the "th" is no higher than the 111.
In the fake memos its actually higher. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|