|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mary Former Member
Joined: 17 Sep 2004 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, frankly, the information here from Navy Chief backs up the information provided by those supporting the medal in this particular action. NavyChief is showing the fleeing Viet Cong had a loaded rocket launcher with him and also that the boats took fire. Ten viet cong killed and the surprise maneuver apparently was pretty effective, regardless of whether it was planned in advance and whether they may have hoped they got medals. I suppose if someone wants to complain that Kerry hoped for medals, that is really not as big a crime as some were accusing him of regarding lying about this event when it now shows the facts back up the medal.
I think it's really good that the truth, whether it supports or disagrees with Kerry, is important to get at, and I think NavyChief did the honorable thing by pointing out the facts. What we make of them is up to us. But personally I'm less annoyed at Kerry over this particular action now. He was being accused implicitly of chasing down a wounded, cowering, unarmed kid and shooting him in the back, and clearly this enemy combatant was armed and had already used the launcher and they'd taken fire likely from others too, since it said all the boats were under fire, but the fact that they only killed one in that part of the action doesn't mean more hadn't fled. (Deleted by Admin)
Admin note: Your Kerry talking point totalizer is now activated. I would suggest that a discussion of facts as opposed to your "opinion" as to the motivation of the SBVT will be much more conducive to your longevity in this forum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Navy_Navy_Navy Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mary wrote: | I think it's really good that the truth, whether it supports or disagrees with Kerry, is important to get at, and I think NavyChief did the honorable thing by pointing out the facts. |
Ahhhh, well - as interested as you are in the truth, then you will, no doubt, be absolutely beside yourself as the analysis starts coming out of the files that have been so carefully scanned by our fabulous volunteers at the Naval Archives.
And since you people seem to insist that Naval documents are the only credible source of truth, you'll be really happy to see that your boy is nailed to the wall using official, original Navy reports and forms. _________________ ~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Admin Note:
To the Forum:
Please be aware that these wholesale deletions of NavyChief posts are not being done by forum staff but by Navy Chief.
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
greasepaint Seaman
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 177 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Has the 'combat V device' re Silver Star, on Kerry's
DD214 (release from active duty) , been explained?
I find it odd that two wierd things happen on the
same (Silver Star) incident, those two things would be the
'combat V mistake', and Lehman's denial of knowledge
of his signing of the (third) cert.
.....
Also, I am very curious as to when Kerry's DD24 (r. from active)
was typed (or retyped). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|