SwiftVets.com

[Rurik]

There are a lot of good partial answers in this thread. But here are a couple mor pieces of the puzzle.

Liberal proneness toviolence streches all the way backto their roots inthe 1960s. Those people are at heart no-fault revolutionaries. Cowards posing as heroes,who seek to slay a garden lizard and strut as if they had slain a dragon. They never stand up against real danger. Notice how they back down and squeal with outraged surprise when thier violence is met by counter-violence. If our police and courts would meet violence with some serious force and some serious sentencing, I bet we'd get a lot less action from these "playtime martyrs". BTW, does this concept seem to any of you evocative of a certain "playtime war hero"?

The second factor is Bush hatred. Contrary to what many on the left say, they do not hate Bush because they hate his war, but the other way around. The Dems never hated anyof Clinton's wars. And they hated Bush before 9-11.
But there was a time when Bush was not hated. Go back to 1999, beore Bush received the nomination. Check the newspapers and editorials, and be reminded that at that time Bush was considred the Republicn aspirant who would be most acceptable to the Democrats. His ordinary demonization began after he got the GOP nomination, and only culminated after the Florida recount.
To interject a bit of psychology, we do not hate those who do wrong to us, half so much as we hate those whom we have wronged. And even more we hate those who blithely escape our malice, succeed, and then turn and forgive us.
And that is exactly the position of the Democrats. The 2000 election involved far more than Florida. There was massive voter fraud by illegal aliens in California, and by unregistered or multiply registered voters in many other states. In Milwaukee students openly boasted and joked on local TV news about thier pranks and exploits in making the rounds fo the polls for multiple voting. Thre was the town in Pennsylvania with more votes than registered voters. Polls were kept open late in St. Louis, and much more. There was coordinated electoral tampering by the Dems across the country. And then in Florida after ballot stuffing came up short, they used a shallow excuse to try to go back for a second stuffing, and a mission to "count and recount until we get the count we want". And in every state but Florida, Bush refused to challenge or contes their schemes, thus legitimizing all the other thefts. His position was "I'm too much a gentleman to fight for what you've already stolen, but I'm keeping what I've got". And the Democrats were left spitting "How dare you cheat us of our victory after we stole it fair and square!!" Thus the Dems project both their anger at losing and their guilty conscience, and their rage and being foiled in thier schemes." And Bush's attempts to be magnanimous only enrage them further by remindign them fo their own sins.
If Kerry wins the election, neither Bush, nor Republicans, nor Swiftees can expect any magnaminity, but only retribution. If Bush wins, we must expect to see even more intense disruption and violence than we have seen yet.
_________________
Hating John Kerry continuously since 1971.

Essayons!
Fight Build and Destroy