SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Death rates SB vs. TANG?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Resources & Research
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Arty Guy
Seaman


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 190

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have seen F 102's referred to as "lawn darts". Perhaps somebody with real air force experience can comment on that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boundless
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

> I have seen F 102's referred to as "lawn darts".

a. That name is more generally associated with the F16.
b. The lawn dart toy may not have been on the market then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PigBoatAndy
Former Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I looked into this some time ago, from the perspective of:
what were the expectations of GWB & JfK when they enlisted.

When GWB enlisted, the F-102A was being used in combat
in RVN, and was just coming off a terrible safety record.
GW's unit was in RVN. He probably expected to be flying
a dangerous airplane, and that he could expect to be sent
to RVN.

As luck would have it, he ended up flying a desk in GA,
despite a reported attempt to get an RVN assignment,
even if it meant retraining on some other a/c type. I'm
told that during the years Bush was in, only 8 pilots died
in F-102As, so it ended up being safer than he might
have expected at the outset. But signing up to be a pilot
in any service is a dumb place to "hide" from danger.
Indeed, if the story of Barnes "helping" GW get into the
TANG was true, then Barnes must have been trying to
get GW killed, based on the situation at the time.

Kerry signed up in the USNR, and found himself in the blue
water Navy, far from direct combat risk, which may well
have been his intention (based on later admissions in
news interviews). When he transferred to PCFs, they were
doing coastal Market Time.
I suspect that whatever hazard
MT represented, the JFK-PT-109 connection was
irresistible to someone who literally saw himself as JFK-2.

As luck would have it, JfK found himself doing SEALORD,
which was very dangerous indeed. Oops. This is not to
plan. A man could get killed. Little wonder that he figured
out how to game the medal system and flee within a few
months.

The "hazard" expectations (motives) for these two gents
would seem to be have been opposites at the outset,
and opposite at the outcomes. I don't know that we can
today nail it down mathematically.


Please tell EN2 Jerry Phillips and LT Tom Bostrom that Market Time was not hazardous (sorta, kinda like sitting at the San Simeon Light House).

Who were EN2 Jerry Phillips and LT Tom Bostrom - see the links in my earlier append.


1. http://www.usni.org/navalhistory/Articles98/NHwells.htm
2. http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-cp/history/WEBCUTTERS/Point_Welcome.html

DEAD MARKET TIME COASTIES

IMHO - all EXCONUS Operational duty is Hazardous - I will even concede with respect to TANG that all operational duty is Hazardou. We have had NGsmen killed in post-tornado and post-hurricane disaster recovery, and CA-ANGmen killed in Peace time search and rescure ops.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boundless
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

>> When he transferred to PCFs, they were doing coastal
>> Market Time. I suspect that whatever hazard MT
>> represented, the JFK-PT-109 connection was
>> irresistible to someone who literally saw himself as JFK-2.

> Please tell EN2 Jerry Phillips and LT Tom Bostrom that
> Market Time was not hazardous ...

I didn't say Market Time was "not hazardous".

Here's what Kerry has said about it.

About his USNR enlistment:
"I didn't really want to get involved in the war,"

About volunteering for PCFs:
"I signed up for the swift boats, they had very little to
do with the war. They were engaged in coastal patrolling
and that's what I thought I was going to be doing."


Here's the rhetorical question about expectations of
going in harm's way:
If Kerry had known about SEALORD, would he still
have applied for PCFs?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
F. Rottles
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be fair, Kerry also said his second choice was to serve on a PBR (I think that was in Brinkley's book, too). I doubt that second choice could be confirmed today. PBRs were already in the rivers at that time.

I do think this subtopic -- his expectations as a candidate for a Swift Boat -- intersects directly with his Christmas in Cambodia story.

A month before Kerry arrived in Vietnam, the Swifts were beginning to probe the inland water routes. Bernique near Ha Tien. Brown in the Ca Mau peninsula. And Elliot led a small flotilla of boats up the Rach Giang Thanh (where Kerry would later insist on doing just coastal patrols), across to Chau Doc (where Kerry would later imagine himself during Christmas), and down to Rach Gia through the Sa Dec area (where Kerry was docked 24-Dec-1968). His expectations for Swift Boat duty did not match what the Swiftees were getting into.

Must have been quite an adjustment. Maybe other Swiftees here can describe their own responses to the changes at that time.

Kerry was transfered to An Thoi in early December, did routine coastal patrol, was transferred back upcoast in mid December, and then he found himself in the vicinity of Sa Dec at Christmastime. Given the aggressive new mission of the Swiftees, a rookie might well have tricked himself into feeling like he was suddenly closer to the Cambodian border than he actually was. And closer than he had expected he ever would be.

Whether or not it was the mission for which he, and others, had volunteered, orders sent him into the rivers and canals. If the Cambodian border represented the enemy's infiltration routes, the presence of the VC attempting to protect their communication and supplies lines well within Vietnam probably did bring the "border" to PCF-44 -- even if Kerry never took PCF-44 to the border itself.

Kerry appears to have appropriated the experiences of others. And embellished his own actual experiences. However, I don't get the sense that this is very common among Swift Boat Veterans. But this tendency of Kerry's seems to be replayed over and over on the nightly news. And the tie-in with the Winter Soldier stories is painfully obvious.

Maybe this is all pyschobabble and I am over-reaching, but I think there is a strong theme of self-deception that ties these subtopics together.

Consider the ambush reported by 3 PBRs on the Rach Gia Long Xuyen canal: 241550Z DEC68 CTF 116 Enemy Truce Violation. SOURCE: COMNAVFORV CTF 116 Miscellaneous Msg., Box 219.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Resources & Research All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group