SwiftVets.com

[leeinwv]

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15575


The Soros-Kerry Nexus
By Rachel Ehrenfeld and Shawn Macomber
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 19, 2004

While George Soros and John Kerry were vacationing in neighboring mansions in Sun Valley, Idaho, the two men chatted on the phone but avoided a personal meeting, “because,” as Soros told USA Today, “of how it would be interpreted.”

For Soros, who has put down at least $18 million to defeat Bush this year, keeping up appearances is essential. Coordination between the 527 groups Soros has been raining money down upon and the Kerry campaign, after all, is strictly verboten in the age of McCain-Feingold. Is it plausible the Dems’ billionaire benefactor and the candidate avoided talk of the election campaign strategy entirely? The facts on the ground suggest otherwise.


Soros major anti-Bush donations have gone to MoveOn.org, the group infamous for its over the top, hate-laden ads; and to former Clinton chief of staff John Podesta’s new think tank, the Center for American Progress (CAP); and to America Coming Together, a get-out-the-Democratic vote operation headed by former AFL-CIO political director Steve Rosenthal and Ellen Malcolm, president of the pro-abortion EMILY’s List.



ACT steadfastly denies it is violating federal law by coordinating with the Kerry campaign, but brags on its website that it is currently, “laying the groundwork to defeat George W. Bush and elect Democrats.” Maybe the group is thinking of some Democrat other than John Kerry? Perhaps, but then the fact that former ACT staffer Rodney Shelton is now Kerry’s Arkansas state director seems a bit odd. Isolated incident? Nope. Kerry’s former campaign manager Jim Jordan is now on staff at ACT. And techno-whiz Zach Exley left the upper echelons of MoveOn.org to work for Kerry.



“It's inevitable that Exley is going to be using MoveOn folks and information for the Kerry campaign. The guy was their opposition research guy,” a Bush campaign staffer told the Washington Prowler. “The RNC has been saying all along that these guys have been working together, so now the guy responsible for all those anti-Bush ads on TV and the Web is essentially doing the same thing for the Kerry camp? Soros probably has an office in Kerry campaign headquarters by now.”



Harold Ickes, the widely acknowledged driving force behind Americans Coming Together and the Media Fund, is also a member of the executive committee of the Democratic National Committee. Ickes recently admitted to Business Week that “he occasionally tells the Kerry camp what he's up to.” That magazine also noted that ACT and The Media Fund were briefing journalists just down the hall from the DNC Finance Committee's hospitality suite at Boston's Four Seasons Hotel during the Democratic National Convention. These are activities that Soros’s vast resources clearly made possible.


So was Soros being facetious when he signed off on a 2000 Open Society Institute report that claimed one of the group’s major goals was to get, “states to experiment with various approaches to reduce the pressure of money on elections and legislation, ranging from improved disclosure to full public financing of campaigns”? His 1995 book Soros on Soros contains a clue as to what he may be thinking: “I do not accept the rules imposed by others...I am a law-abiding citizen, but I recognize that there are regimes that need to be opposed rather than accepted. And in periods of regime change, the normal rules don’t apply.” Clearly, Soros considers himself as someone who is able to determine when the “normal rules” should and shouldn’t apply.

Democrats, hungry for a 2004 win, don’t much care whether George Soros is following the “normal rules” these days or not. One “Democratic operative” told U.S. News & World Report, “[Republicans] don’t accept the legitimacy of political opposition. These people will do anything to gain and hold power. So I’m not exactly feeling full of ethical scruples as we fight for survival.”

Aside from desperately attempting to make John Kerry president, what other cause has George Soros bankrolled? One joint venture between the Tides Foundation, one of potential first lady Teresa Heinz-Kerry’s favorite charities, and Soros’s Open Society Institute is the Democratic Justice Fund, which FrontPage Magazine’s Ben Johnson has noted, “seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration to the United States, particularly from countries designated by the State Department as ‘terrorist nations.’”



Long term, if Soros has his way, the United States won’t even remain territorially intact. He funds both the National Council of La Raza and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, two groups that want to essentially eliminate America’s borders. In a much hailed 1997 speech to the National Council of La Raza, former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo said that he “proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important – a very important – part of this.” As FrontPage Magazine reported earlier this year, OSI has likewise contributed $65,000 to the Malcolm X Grassroots movement, which wants to establish an all-black homeland in the Southeastern United States, from South Carolina to Louisiana. It would be communist, of course.


In September 2003 Soros was invited to speak at one of the State Department’s Open Forums, where he laid out his hyper-internationalist aspirations for American society, including his proposed “modification of the concept of sovereignty” which is needed because “sovereignty is basically somewhat anachronistic.”



Someone ought to ask John Kerry where he stands on all of this. We deserve to know what these two fabulously wealthy power brokers have been planning for us over these vacation phone calls.

[Tilly]

Excellent post!

Thanks.

Now, I'm kind of wondering what Soros' hedge funds are doing with the oil market these days.

[drjohn]

Soros want drugs legalized so he can corner that market as well.

What I do not understand is why, when Kerry day after day after day, makes false assertions about Bush (social security and the draft), that the Bush staff does not start spreading facts like Kerry being in the hip pocket of Soros and Kerry seeking to legalize all kinds of drugs so Soros can benefit.

I also do not understand for the life of me why the Bush campaign does not point out over and over that Teresa the billionaire would not pay one penny more in taxes with the Kerry tax plan.

She makes well over $200,000 per year.

[Anker-Klanker]

Speaking of George Soros, does anyone have a clue as to why he had to go to an Australian newspaper to spew his poison, and after their election at that?

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,11112079%255E7583,00.html

This really makes my flag go up. What's going on?

[drjohn]

Good question!

It's a Mooresque collection of accusations. Coming from a goon who made billions betting against the US dollar it should surprise no one. This has something to do with money. This war is somehow costing him MONEY. He wants the drug market and I'd wager it's connected to that.

[shadowy]

He sure can pack a lot of lies into a short article!
Repeal McCain Feingold. Soros pushed for it--that's reason enough. But it's obviously not an improvement to have unaccountable organizations running wild with millions of dollars and no reason to restrict themselves to honest debate.

[Stevie]

and Halperin's (abc) father and brother work for Soros!

father is vp of CAP and brother is officer of their youth movement....

that tips abc for Kerry!
_________________
Stevie
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should
be arrested, exiled or hanged.

[army72]

MSM cover any of this? Not a chance! They would create a story about Bush connections no matter how thin the evidence. Just look at the cBS
fake story. They still tried to say even though it was fake, the message was still true. Or they are saying that they don't need any proof to take a swipe at Bush.

They have no problem repeating the idiotic 'Swifties have been proven false' garbage. Never offer proof, just make the statement and run.

They really hate that some people care to check out their stories and have the nerve to prove them wrong.
_________________
Hillary and Kerry in '08? Something smells!!