SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

WashTimes Editorial: Running Interference

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:26 pm    Post subject: WashTimes Editorial: Running Interference Reply with quote

Running interference
Washington Times Editorial
October 20, 2004

It's generally understood that media outlets like the New York Times speak to the liberal wing of the American electorate, such as it is. In other words, detecting a liberal bias in the mainstream media is like John Kerry saying he served in Vietnam — hardly earth-shattering news. Throughout the current election season, however, the media has surpassed even its own shoddy record of offering Americans anything resembling objective reporting. To use a term from our favorite forged memo, it has in fact played interference for the Kerry campaign.

Earlier this year, ABC News political director Mark Halperin conceded as much in a posting on the network's Web site, The Note: "Like every other institution, the Washington and political press corps operate with a good number of biases and predictions ... The press, by and large, does not accept President Bush's justifications for the Iraq war ... It does not understand how educated, sensible people could possibly be wary of multilateral institutions or friendly, sophisticated European allies." Mr. Halperin was trying to tell his readers what they could expect in the upcoming election coverage. He was right, but his own biases were leaked earlier this month in an internal memo in which he told ABC employees to give Mr. Bush's assertions greater scrutiny than Mr. Kerry's.

And no where was the media's skewed "reporting" more apparent than during the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth's attacks on Mr. Kerry's Vietnam record. Until Aug. 19, two weeks after the swift vets aired their first ad, the media had ignored them. But Aug. 19 happened to be the day when the Kerry campaign issued its first response to the swift vets. Yet, according to the few outlets that covered the story, the only noteworthy thing was that the swift vets were financed by Republicans, a tidbit procured exclusively from the DNC. This was what made front-page news in the New York Times, complete with a handy flowchart. Pro-Kerry organizations like MoveOn.org and America Coming Together, with ample ties to the Kerry campaign, garnered no such scrutiny.

The media's counterattack to the swift vets has been far worse. The CBS News/Dan Rather meltdown over yet another story on Mr. Bush's Guard service was just one consequence. This month, ABC News' "Nightline" with anchor Ted Koppel relied on 35-year-old recollections of Vietnamese Communists to rebut the swift vets' account of Mr. Kerry's Silver Star. It says a lot about ABC News when it trusts the word of aging Communist guerrillas over that of 260 decorated American veterans. A report from the Center for Media and Public Affairs that tracked media coverage from Sept. 7 to Oct. 1, or roughly the period when the media counterattack was in full swing, found that the Big Three networks' favorable coverage of the two candidates tilted by 18 percent toward Mr. Kerry. Conversely, that much-maligned conservative network, Fox News, was far more fair and balanced, tilting its favorable coverage toward Mr. Bush by only 2 percent.

As Michael Barone, senior writer for U.S. News & World Report, put it: "This campaign has been less one between George W. Bush and John Kerry than one between George W. Bush and old media."

Washington Times
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coldwarvet
Admiral


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1125
Location: Minnetonka, MN

PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How do we send thank you notes to the Washinton times. Lets flood them with notes of gratitude. I think hand written snail mail notes are in order.

CWV
_________________
Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.

"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto

USAF 75-79 Security Police
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately, the media isn't encouraging snail mail, any more, after the anthrax scares.

You can write them on this form-submission page, though.

Hard to fit a lot of thanks into 100 characters, but I tried. Smile
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coldwarvet
Admiral


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1125
Location: Minnetonka, MN

PostPosted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This War on Terror is more then a nuisance, when you can’t even send a paper thank you note through the US postal service.

CWV
_________________
Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.

"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto

USAF 75-79 Security Police
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dimsdale
Captain


Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 527
Location: Massachusetts: the belly of the beast

PostPosted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The President sees the problem, as evidenced by the slam he took at them (Schieffer's CBS in particular) in the third debate:

Quote:
BUSH: In all due respect, I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about -- oh, nevermind. Anyway, let me quote the Lewin report. The Lewin report is a group of folks who are not politically affiliated. They analyzed the senator's plan. It cost $1.2 trillion.

_________________
Everytime he had a choice, Kerry chose to side with communists rather than the United States.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group