SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

David Horowitz-Counsels of Cowardice and Defeat

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ScottyDog
Ensign


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Location: Mexifornia

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:18 pm    Post subject: David Horowitz-Counsels of Cowardice and Defeat Reply with quote

Another great article by David Horowitz on the Legacy of John Kerry

http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15650

*******************************************************
Counsels of Cowardice and Defeat
By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 25, 2004

A political ad was placed in the New York Times by the radical organization MoveOn.org, a group that has provided a platform for attacks on the Bush Administration by Howard Dean, Al Gore and members of the Kerry-Edwards campaign. The ad was an open letter purportedly from college students and began: “President Bush Will You Call On Us To Die?”

This was not really criticism of the President’s policy choices or of America’s war to liberate Iraq, but rather a frontal attack on both. In addition to its blunt and unwarranted assertion that service to one’s country was equivalent to a death sentence, it falsely insinuated that the President was planning a military draft, which would make the service as involuntary as …well …a death sentence would be. Finally, it demanded that the President provide “a plan to end the war,” and did so without expressing the slightest concern about the war’s outcome. In other words, in the midst of America’s armed conflict with a terrifying enemy the MoveOn.org ad was an incitement to self-interest, cowardice and defeat. The ad ended with a parsing of John Kerry’s famous question about Vietnam – a war he first abandoned and then turned against: “Most importantly, when will we know that the last of our friends has died?”

What has happened to the moral fiber of this country that a group as close to the center of American political life as MoveOn.org would counsel cowardice, selfishness and defeat in the midst of a war with an enemy as ruthless and determined as the terrorists in Iraq? The war in Iraq was authorized in congressional resolution by both political parties. It is a war to enforce a unanimous Security Council ultimatum, and sixteen ignored Security Council ultimatums before that. It is a war to depose one of the worst tyrants of the modern world, whose removal is a policy requested by two successive American presidents, again representing both political parties. It is a war in which every enemy of the United States is ranged on the other side. What has happened to the moral fiber of this country that an organization like MoveOn.org – along with many leaders of the Democratic Party -- should actively seek to sabotage this war by turning America’s youth against it, and demanding a retreat from the field of battle without condition?



The retreat from Vietnam and Cambodia that Mr. Kerry did so much to encourage thirty years ago had an unhappy ending that critics of this war seem eager to forget. That retreat resulted in the deaths of two-and-half million Indo-Chinese peasants whom the Communists slaughtered when they came to power. This is infamous bloodbath whose prospect John Kerry dismissed as a possibility when he debated Swift Boat vet John O’Neill on the Dick Cavett show. John Kerry proved wrong then. What if the proponents of retreat from Iraq prove wrong this time?



If the United States were to lose the battle for Iraq (and a retreat without condition would ensure that), there would be a similar bloodbath. Every Iraqi who has fought for their freedom, every ally of America in Iraq will be put to the sword by Zarqawi and his terrorist cohorts – many quite literally. The terrorist government of Iran, whose jihadists are now engaged in fighting our troops alongside the agents of Saddam Hussein will emerge from our retreat as the dominant force in a radicalized Middle East. Revenge against the crusaders will be high on its agenda.



It is time for us to take the counsels of doom in our midst seriously. The threat we face is not only external. American troops can army in the field of battle. What America cannot do is win the war on terror if the forces of selfishness and cowardice and defeatism divide us at home.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sevry
Commander


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 326

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:03 pm    Post subject: Re: David Horowitz-Counsels of Cowardice and Defeat Reply with quote

ScottyDog wrote:
Another great article by David Horowitz on the Legacy of John Kerry



Let's remember Kerry's remarks on that Cavett show. Questioning John O'Neill's patriotism:

Quote:

I'm somewhat surprised at the attitude of somebody who wore the same uniform as I did who served in the same military for the same kind, I hope, of patriotic reasons . . .


On the matter of Iraq . . er . . Vietnam:

Quote:

What we say is the troops can be withdrawn faster. What we say is the killing can stop tomorrow, and it can stop if the president of the United States will set a date certain for the withdrawal . . .


Or one could just argue that Kerry has been stuck in his own 'time-warp' for 30+ years.

As for his personal war crimes:

Quote:

I did take part in search-and-destroy missions in which the houses of noncombatants were burned to the ground. And all of these, I find out later on, these acts are contrary to the Hague and Geneva Conventions and to the laws of warfare.


Someone should have taken his Zippo away. Cause he only found out . . later.

As for signing forms:

Quote:

Now, there are individuals who are perfectly willing to sign. Nobody's ducking anything.


Which in the context as O'Neill pointed out, had just as hollow a ring then as it has in 2004 when it came to form 180.

As to the comment by Horowitz:

Quote:

. . . and the issue really is why can't we set a date. Mr. O'Neill has simply shrugged this off, saying that would be absurd.


This is the reason it seemed absurd. First in Kerry's own words:

Quote:

Well, a few weeks ago the report came out that 54 naval bases and other bases, all the bases in the Delta, had been overrun in the first three months of 1971, and that the reason they were overrun was because in 22 cases sentries were asleep, in 22 cases there were quislings, people who gave up.


And as stated by O'Neill:

Quote:

I think there are three things we can all agree on. First, we all want to see a speedy end to American involvement in Vietnam. Second, we all realize that if we come home from Vietnam leaving our POWs rotting in North Vietnamese jails, that we will leave the heart and soul of this country there also.

Finally, we all want to see the South Vietnamese have the type of government that they themselves freely choose. I suggest that it's time for an end to hate and disruption in this country. I suggest it's time for trust in this country.


The South Vietnamese were left indefensible, to the shame of the left in this country who made that so. And that must have seemed a quaint sentiment in those days - to trust in the nation. The LM was at the peak of their power, and had just become the LM to the chagrin of WWII 'objective' journalists writing at the time, in the mid to late 1960s. They foresaw a loss of credibility, somewhat along the lines of what former FOX viewers have seen lately after FOX went to the movies (apparently they were the only ones to actually see that film). I doubt the critics of what became the LM foresaw talk radio. I think it's unlikely they would have imagined an internet, or Swift Vets websites. But the general complaint has been proved with the passing years. How could it be otherwise?

Meanwhile, Kerry is still using the same book, the same unchallenged view, the same hothouse rhetoric from which he is carefully shielded, and particularly by the LM.

So Kerry, this 'little man' as O'Neill called him on Cavett, and as Kerry appeared to be answering questions for NBC today, won't win. It seems likely that more people who vote know that John Kerry is Unfit for Command.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group