SwiftVets.com

[Hondo]

becca1223:

[Stevie]

I realize this is a strange question, but, if I get the right answer, it does have a point....

does anyone remember hearing Karen Hughes on tv talking about W's

'crooked smile' .... smirk.... not really a smirk, just a bit crooked smile etc

it would have been a day or so after the last debate I think.... unless I dreamt it....
_________________
Stevie
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should
be arrested, exiled or hanged.

[becca1223]

oops...sorry! "biased in favor of Kerry". Here's an article Linda Vester wrote on that piece. However, it doesn't list the woman jounalist.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,136560,00.html

[Kimmymac]

You guys: uh, dam. Sierra.

I applaud NavyChief, I really do. I am in awe.

But listen: expecting the OIM to do anything in the way of exposing Kerry for the tratorous mayherotinhell bassturd he is...is a waste of energy. I don't need to remind you of the landfills full of evidence we had on Clinton, do I? This is familiar territory for us; now let's just make sure the outcome is different.

The bottom line is that the war goes to those with the most effective ground campaign. We all want shock and awe but the war is won on the ground by the grunts.

So pound the ground, and don't stop. Don't waste any amount of time looking over your shoulders waiting for re-inforcements or scanning the horizon for close air support from the OIM, because it ain't coming. It ain't gonna happen. It's just you and me and we have to be able to fight with whatever we carried in. Because we are it.

Stop looking for an October Surprise. Phuq the October Surprise. Let's give the darksiders a November Surprise that gives them a 4 year long migraine.
_________________
The last refuge of scoundrels is not patriotism; it is finicky liberal humanitarianism.--Martin Paretz

[2ndamendsis]

I thought I should let everyone see this response I've just received from one of the emails {tons} I've sent today.

[mdcrandall]

[coolhand]

[Nomorelies]

Michelle Malkin has it !!!!!!!

[Rdtf]

hooray! And the link she provides is the one at www.humaneventsonline.com - I didn't know they had picked it up. they have a large readership - they send out a hard copy (newspaper style) every week to members.

[Nomorelies]

More placements on the net


http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41062
http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/staticpages/index.php?page=puppets
http://www.inthebullpen.com/archives/2004/10/26/interesting/
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41106
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE

[Rdtf]

from Malkins site, she also provides a link to this at wizbang http://wizbangblog.com/archives/004073.php


Chad Evans is a Texas Tech alum who has first had knowledge of the document archive the "John Kerry worked with the commies" papers came from. (I'm still looking for a name as you can tell.)

He pulled some strings and got a brief interview with the archivist in charge of the collection. Chad and I worked on a set of questions for him. Here are the results.

"I just got off the phone with Steven Maxner, Director of the Vietnam Archive, and he answered a few questions for me.
How any member of the mainstream media contacted the Vietnam Archive in
relation to this story? No. Not the New York Times, the Washington Post or
any other major newspaper

Have you personally seen the documents in question? Yes I have. Can you vouch for the authenticity of the reports? Of course. These documents came from the the Douglas Pike Archive. Douglas Pike worked for the State Department and these documents came from our intelligence.

When did the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth visit the archives? Were they
able to find the documents right away or did they have to search for a
while? I cannot disclose personal information concerning any of our patrons
just as any library couldn't disclose personal information. The guys were
here sometime last week, though I was not here so I do not know what day
they came. It's my understanding they were here for a good portion of the
day so it they probably had to search for the documents and didn't know
where to find them when they came in.

[fb274]

NEWSMAX has the article concerning the IQ's-
http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/26/82947.shtml


Tuesday, Oct. 26, 2004 8:21 a.m. EDT
I.Q. Expert: Bush Smarter than Kerry

Since the early days of his first presidential campaign, Democratic hit men and women have challenged George W. Bush on his alleged poor intellect.


The generalization was that sure, Bush might be a folksy, down-home, warm guy but come on – when it comes to brains, he got left behind.



Story Continues Below



In fact, a phony claim from the non-existent "Lovenstein Institute" which circulated on the Internet in 2001 and was eventually included in leftist Gary Trudeau's "Doonesbury" comic strip pegged the president's I.Q. at 91, the lowest of any modern-day president.


Never mind that the young George W. Bush mastered both Yale and fighter planes, and managed to succeed in a number of business ventures, which included the successful purchase and sale of Major League Baseball's Texas Rangers.


Now, Bush bashers should get ready to wince, moan and groan: The New York Times reports Bush is not only a brainy guy, but may actually be smarter than the other Yale-educated presidential candidate John Kerry.


The Times quoted Steve Sailer, a columnist for immigration reform Web magazine Vdare.com, who is also adept at estimating a person's I.Q., and has done so for many presidents in the past.


In the 2000 presidential race, Sailer estimated Democrat Al Gore's I.Q. to be 10 points higher than Bush's score, which figured to be around the mid-120s.


Reports the Times: "Mr. Bush's score on the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test."


Sailer's analysis was called credible by Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware. She told the Times she wasn't surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter.


"People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," she said.


We won't hold our breath waiting for the president's detractors to apologize.

[dusty]

If we can just ever get him charged and in court, the Chief has him screwed, blued and tattoed with incontrovertible evidence too. The good stuff. Like Henry Lee type disection of the evidence that just flat out locks it down.
If we can just get him charged.....

Dusty

[Nomorelies]

Navy Chief:

Does this documentary link to Kerry provide the proof necessary to charge him with treason?
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE

[NavyChief]