SwiftVets.com

I B Squidly · Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:03 pm Post subject:

2 cents worth:

-Drudge has gone to the darkside. With all the crap breaking loose he's investigating whom Caroline Kennedy and Slate.com endorse.

-the explosives story was to be a Sunday surprise but CBS/NYT/DNC couldn't "hold" and ruined their game plan and broke it early to overshadow HanoiPuppet.

-MSM will bloviate as long and loud as possible. Condi's just said the Russian angle is wrong (russians can't get crops to market and they're going to send fleets of trucks to Iraq?) It's just line extension and as it fades they'll say Haliburton moved the explosives. Any red herring to distract.

- Extremists coordinated with 'intelligence' to steal.....? That's gotta come straight from McAuliff's war-room.

-if your not steeped in this stuff as we are Hanoi Johnny is tuff to get in 60 seconds. MSM shares Kerry's world view, Senators share skeletons and those younger than boomers don't appreciate the whole 'Commie' thing.

Carry On Smartly

drjohn · Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:24 pm Post subject:

Has Drudge carried the collaboration story at all?

Of not, how about we suggest it him ?

STRONGLY

Spiess · Lieutenant Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 246

cipher · Vice Admiral Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902

Personally, I think Drudge is a lost cause on this. He doesn't see Kerry's past history as being "relevent" to today's issues.

Just because Kerry was a communist collaborator, NVA apologist, and Viet Cong supporter then doesn't mean he's a French collaborator, UN apologist and terrorist supporter now.

Oh, he still despises the military, but he's been consistent about that all his life.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92

drjohn · Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:35 pm Post subject:

His history of appeasement is most relevant.

Cut intelligence, appease the countries who betray us.

Seems relevant to me, but I am no politician.

2ndamendsis · PO3 Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 288 Location: NJ

FIRST PHONE CALL to John Gambling!

Woman talking about the documents & articles.

Gambling {the boob} pushed it aside as not interested in anything so old!! Woman declared that it shows his character and cannot be trusted.

Gambling {the boob} "his record in the Senate" was more important.

CALLS, imho, will be another way to cause a fissure in the media's blackout.
_________________
PROUD wife of Army ASA Vet - 66-70
mom of Sailor - Gulf 1
daughter of WW11 Army Vet

Rdtf · CNO Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville

jenn-south · Seaman Recruit Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 18

SEAN HANNITY'S MOTHER-IN-LAW IS AT GOP HEADQUARTER'S NOW!!!!

Just called the local chap where signed up to volunteer and when I ask if they'd heard anything about the documents yet, they hadn't. Told I'd been calling everyone and she said, "well, Hannity's m-in-law sitting right here. Can I bring copies of articles up?"

I'm on my way guys!!!!!!!!!1 keep fingers crossed, this might help!!! jenny

cipher · Vice Admiral Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902

Gambling made a simple statement that he doesn't think what happened 33 years ago isn't important.

Why then are we STILL hunting WWII Japanese and German war criminals and bringing them to trial? That was SIXTY years ago. There are some things that should not be forgotten just because they happened to "OLD" people.

Mr Gambling, you too, will be old some day. And when someone says "Well, what happened in September 2001 just isn't relevant to TODAY", don't be TOO shocked if you feel like clocking him up side the head with a tire iron.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92

2ndamendsis · PO3 Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 288 Location: NJ

Jenn, you're HOT today!! You go girl!!

Cipher---WELL SAID Laughing

{I love it when you talk this way} Wink

Rdtf · CNO Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville

3rd doc is on the Texas Tech site now-

http://star.vietnam.ttu.edu/

NavyChief · Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:52 pm Post subject:

ILUVTHEUSA · Ensign Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 66

Okay, I have emailed many on the list provided from Dogooder's post on page 35 of this forum.
I am new to this and feel a bit incompetent Embarassed

-- I need help (please) Confused

in my reply to this email sent back from volokh@law.ucla.edu (the sixth down on the email list on page 35):

From: "Volokh, Eugene" <VOLOKH@law.ucla.edu>
Subject: RE: New found documents at Texas Tech University
To: AJB

Hmm -- I've skimmed over the first two documents, but not the 81-pager -- do they mention Kerry anywhere, or VVAW? Do they suggest that he is deliberately in league with the North Vietnamese plans, or just that he played into their hands? (Page numbers might be helpful for this.)

Also, who translated these? Thanks,

Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: AJB [mailto:ajbebay@optonline.net]
Sent: Thu 10/28/2004 11:08 AM
To: Volokh, Eugene
Cc:
Subject: New found documents at Texas Tech University

( should I send him an email with Linda Chavez' article The Media Plays Trick or Treat

GeorgiaBoy · Seaman Apprentice Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 97

Has anyone from Mississippi tried to reach Trent Lott. I think he would be one of the most likely to fire the first salvo.