|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
waltjones PO2
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 392 Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:57 am Post subject: A great Kerry supporter |
|
|
Ah, yes - another fine Kerry supporter, and almost as inconsistent. First Bangert implies Kerry disagrees with him about Iraq, including "strategic withdrawal", then he says Kerry will get us out of a quagmire. If this is the kind of 'Nam vet supporting Kerry, then I hope he keeps flapping his slimy jaws so more people can recognize him for what he is. He also says he didn't support the Gulf War; neither did Kerry, but they're both in a small minority.
Another thing about Joe: I hate to say it, and I could be wrong, but I think he's being truthful about being a door gunner. I was in VMO-3 (3rd MAW) up in Phu Bai for a few months from late December of '66; I later transferred to HMM-265 at Marble Mountain. Since I was in UH-1Es in Phu Bai, and since I flew a few missions as an M60 door gunner (3, I think), our buddy Joe may not be lying about that part, because I'm pretty sure VMO-6 flew Hueys also. I know a guy who was in a VMO about that time, but I don't know which one. I'll find out, and ask him if he knew Bangert.
I must close with the fact that, in 19 months and 2 squadrons/locations, I never saw nor heard of anything approaching what that maniac testified to. I have spoken with (I'd estimate) a couple hundred or more 'Nam vets over the last 35 years, and never heard anything like what he described. Joe Bangert doesn't deserve to say Semper Fidelis!, and I would be happy to tell him that to his face - Kerry must be very proud of him.
Semper Fi! _________________ Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DougReese Former Member
Joined: 22 May 2004 Posts: 396
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 3:10 am Post subject: Re: A great Kerry supporter |
|
|
waltjones wrote: | .
Another thing about Joe: I hate to say it, and I could be wrong, but I think he's being truthful about being a door gunner. I was in VMO-3 (3rd MAW) up in Phu Bai for a few months from late December of '66; I later transferred to HMM-265 at Marble Mountain. Since I was in UH-1Es in Phu Bai, and since I flew a few missions as an M60 door gunner (3, I think), our buddy Joe may not be lying about that part, because I'm pretty sure VMO-6 flew Hueys also. I know a guy who was in a VMO about that time, but I don't know which one. I'll find out, and ask him if he knew Bangert.
|
Over on alt.war.vietnam I believe there were several reasons they said Joe was lying about this. But they supposed that it was possible he went up one or two times.
From research some of them had done they said no way was he a door gunner. I was surprised to see that Bandit found Joe saying that recently, as I'd hadn't ever seen it. Heard it from others, but not from Joe in any comments I've seen on the net from him.
Doug |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PhuCat to Phu Quoc Lt.Jg.
Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 110 Location: California
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
ASPB wrote: | Dog,
Actually, I almost had to do the same thing when I arrived at Ton Son Nhut in Nov of '68. There were 6 or 7 of us arriving and transportation to the Annapolis hotel in Cholon (a neighborhood in Saigon) was late arriving. |
I stayed at the Annapolis three or four different times. I didn't know it was near Cholon. I think the Annapolis BEQ was near a racetrack. We used to walk out in front of the Annapolis and hook a left down the road to go the Army field mess. Using the compass in the seat of my pants I could get around Saigon and I could get in and out of Saigon. I think of Cholon as the place of the BX and commissary and my compass told me Cholon was closer to Hai Ba Trung Street where COMNAVFORV was. My seat of the pants compass never failed me, but strangely enough I never did get my east-west and north-south orientations calibrated, I would say someplace was south when it was actually west or southwest and even today when discussing getting around in IV Corps in 1969, I still get it bass-ackwards most of the time. Now I have maps to straighten me out, in 1969 I didn't.
Hitch-hiking... yeah, but not standing by a road with my thumb out. I hitched rides on deuce-and-halfs between Phu Cat and Qui Nhon and hitched another ride on a Swift Boat, and presented orders for most of my air transportation... whoa! wait... I also hitched a ride on an Air America C-123.
I just don't quite know what makes guys like Joe Bangert tick, and his hitchhiking tale of killing kids in front of two officers doesn't ring clearly, instead it's more like a feces laden gooshy splat modulated by a dull thud. _________________ I'm a U.S. Navy Vietnam War vet against John Kerry
Phu Cat to Phu Quoc 1969-1970
Did Jane Fonda help the North Vietnamese communists?
http://vikingphoenix.com/politics/polls/jfondapoll-1.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The bandit Commander
Joined: 15 May 2004 Posts: 349
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 6:27 am Post subject: Re: A great Kerry supporter |
|
|
waltjones wrote: | Another thing about Joe: I hate to say it, and I could be wrong, but I think he's being truthful about being a door gunner. I was in VMO-3 (3rd MAW) up in Phu Bai for a few months from late December of '66; I later transferred to HMM-265 at Marble Mountain. Since I was in UH-1Es in Phu Bai, and since I flew a few missions as an M60 door gunner (3, I think), our buddy Joe may not be lying about that part, because I'm pretty sure VMO-6 flew Hueys also. I know a guy who was in a VMO about that time, but I don't know which one. I'll find out, and ask him if he knew Bangert.
I must close with the fact that, in 19 months and 2 squadrons/locations, I never saw nor heard of anything approaching what that maniac testified to. I have spoken with (I'd estimate) a couple hundred or more 'Nam vets over the last 35 years, and never heard anything like what he described. Joe Bangert doesn't deserve to say Semper Fidelis!, and I would be happy to tell him that to his face - Kerry must be very proud of him. |
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't only maintenance personal assigned to VMO? Way I had it in my mind was they supplied the aircraft and maintenance and seperate flight crews flew the aircraft. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
waltjones PO2
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 392 Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 1:49 pm Post subject: Maintenance? |
|
|
bandit: No, the enlisted parts of the crews - crew chief and door gunner - were volunteers from the maintenance crews, like me. This was also true in HMM-265. A gunner could be any enlisted MOS - hydraulics, electrician, com/nav tech. etc. All gunners in the two squadrons I served in were volunteers. The crew chiefs flew a lot more than us gunners, and typically were assigned to an aircraft; I ended up with 63 missions, but it wasn't unusual for a crew chief to have two or three hundred. When I read Bangert's story, it's like reading some made-up fantasy compared to what I experienced, but if he was in a Huey VMO at all he could have been a gunner. Note that there were fixed-wing VMOs also; I just don't know the numbers. Your assertions would almost certainly be true if that's what Bangert was in. I've got some research to do, including talking to another 'Nam vet who was in a Huey VMO squadron.
Semper Fi! _________________ Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The bandit Commander
Joined: 15 May 2004 Posts: 349
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was under the impression VMO-6 only had a couple of Slicks, and those were converted to gunships (which most likely did not have a door gun since only operated by a crew of two), rest all fixed winged, like Broncos. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
waltjones PO2
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 392 Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 6:53 pm Post subject: VMO-6? |
|
|
bandit: If that's true, VMO-6 was very different from VMO-3. When I was with them, from training at Pendleton to arrival and subsequent ops at Phu Bai, all we had were Hueys. The 2 most common configs were a couple slicks (no mgs or rockets) with a big red cross for medevacs. maybe another non-medevac slick or two for various non-mission related reasons, and gunships. Our gunships had rockets on either side and M60s in each rear door. The rockets were very susceptible to being set off by static; I remember at least one nasty accident. As I said, I'll do further research on this subject, unless somebody has a definitive answer as to what aircraft were in VMO-6.
Semper Fi! _________________ Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ASPB Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 1680
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a link to a history of VMO-6:
http://www.vmo6rocks.homestead.com/history.html
Compliments of, _________________ On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
waltjones PO2
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 392 Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 9:25 pm Post subject: VMO-6? |
|
|
Thanks ASPB. So it appears that up 'til 1968 they had 01s (what the hell are those??) and UH-1Es, and then got some OV s (fixed-wing, I remember seeing some) in 1968. As I said, for the short time I was with them, VMO-3 had only Hueys. One remaining question that speaks to the likelihood of slimeball being a door gunner is: What was the number and mission of the Hueys in VMO-6? I'll work on it.
Semper Fi! _________________ Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
The O-1G is a two-place observation and liaison aircraft developed from the commercial Cessna Model 170 in 1949. Originally designated as L-19s, "Bird Dogs" were used by the USAF, Army, and Marines for such tasks as artillery spotting, front-line communications, medical evacuation, and pilot training.
In Vietnam, O-1s were used by forward air controllers (FACS) for reconnaissance. A "FAC", often an experienced fighter pilot, was assigned to a specific geographical area, so that he could readily identify enemy activity. If a FAC observed enemy ground targets, he marked them with smoke rockets so they could be easily attacked by fighter-bombers. The FAC remained on the scene to report bombing results.
The USAF ordered more than 3,200 "Bird Dogs," most of which were built as L-19As between 1950 and 1959. The O-1G on display was transferred to the Museum in 1971.
SPECIFICATIONS
Span: 36 ft.
Length: 25 ft. 10 in.
Height: 9 ft. 2 in.
Weight: 2,400 lbs. loaded
Armament: Generally none except smoke rockets
Engine: Continental O-470 of 213 hp.
Crew: two
Serial number: 51-11917
PERFORMANCE
Maximum speed: 150 mph.
Cruising speed: 115 mph.
Range: 530 miles
Service Ceiling: 20,300 ft.
Air Force Museum |
|
Back to top |
|
|
waltjones PO2
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 392 Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 am Post subject: O-1Gs |
|
|
Thanks; I'd say that answers that question!
Semper Fi! _________________ Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|