 |
SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HawkeyeLonewolf
Ensign
Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 69
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 8:14 pm Post subject: >>> Terrorists ARE Liberals who crossed the line... |
 |
|
TERRORISTS ARE LIBERALS WHO HAVE CROSSED THE LINE...
-- Kevin L. Kitchens, 10-29-2004
Listening to the hate and vitriol that has grown since the 2000 election and watching how terrorists act, I am completely convinced of this conclusion:
Terrorists ARE Liberals who have crossed the line.
As we saw with Clinton, liberals feel they are above the law. In Florida, they tried to cheat, lie, and steal an election.
In 2004, they are spreading their intense dirty tricks to try and thwart the electoral process. They are trying to get illegal voters registered, illegal votes counted, and at the very least, get illegal votes simply cast so they can claim that "not all votes were counted."
Kerry is jumping to conclusions and spreading hateful lies solely for the purpose of winning this election. Anything goes according to him and those who support him.
How does this compare to Terrorists?
Likewise, terrorists justify their extreme methods as being for the common good. Even though what they perceive as "good" is not what the world or even most Muslims see as such. The majority of Iraqis support our efforts in Iraq... But terrorists claim to speak for them.
Liberals do the same thing. They force their scorched-earth politics in the same manner that terrorists force their scorched airplane agenda.
Liberals take their narrow-minded twisted view of this country and try to make it mainstream.
Terrorists have used suicide bombers. Liberals tried this tactic already with Max Cleland -- sending him to Crawford, TX in an embarassing display of hate, lies, and anger -- an attempt to destroy Bush while destroying himself in the process -- ala Suicide Bomber.
They do not deserve to win this election -- because they are not ladies and gentlemen any longer. They are hate-filled madmen bent on destroying this country to achieve their own objectives. So are terrorists.
It used to be we could disagree and go on with things... Now we cannot. Liberals are not honorable. They won't back down from facts and evidence, preferring to maintain their outlandish positions. This isn't even a "saving face" effort. They have learned that if they keep repeating a lie often enough -- their loyal followers (sycophants) will believe it.
They are like those little green guys in Toy Story.
Liberals and Terrorists are closer cousins than they realize. They both hate America. They both want to destroy all that is good and replace it with their own sick and twisted vision.
Liberals now are dangerously close to the line that terrorists have crossed. "Anything Goes" doesn't quite mean "anything" ... yet. But it won't be long. It won't be long.
I hate this. This observation does not make me feel good. Because like terrorists, they will only get worse. This country will continue to be divided. Until Democrats rid their party of the liberals who create division and strife -- it will not get better. Just like those racists who dominated until the 60s, liberals must be shunned so that liberalism is a shameful thing to admit they are. The DNC must police itself, from McAuliffe on down.
Only then can America move forward.
Note: Please include a link to original source material when reproducing non-original content.[/size] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HawkeyeLonewolf
Ensign
Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
THis *IS* original content by me. I am Kevin L. Kitchens.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HawkeyeLonewolf
Ensign
Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bumper cars... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rb325th
Admiral
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 1334
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HawkeyeLonewolf wrote: | | THis *IS* original content by me. I am Kevin L. Kitchens. |
Well I'll pass that along 
Though I have a question, do you consider Terrorist as only Liberals who have crossed the line? How about Right Wing Extremist? There are zealots on either end of the political spectrum. I have seen some pretty nasty things said and done by people I would not consider remotely "liberal" in their views.
I see this country being squeezed by extremes way too much.
_________________
U.S. Army 1983-1995, 11C1P/11H2P NBTDT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RogerRabbit
Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 748
Location: Oregon
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Terrorists ARE Liberals who have crossed the line. |
And may they cross the bar - sooner rather than later
_________________
"Si vis pacem, para bellum" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HawkeyeLonewolf
Ensign
Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rb325th wrote: | | HawkeyeLonewolf wrote: | | THis *IS* original content by me. I am Kevin L. Kitchens. |
Well I'll pass that along
Though I have a question, do you consider Terrorist as only Liberals who have crossed the line? How about Right Wing Extremist? There are zealots on either end of the political spectrum. I have seen some pretty nasty things said and done by people I would not consider remotely "liberal" in their views.
I see this country being squeezed by extremes way too much. |
I agree, there are fringe elements on both sides. I have move ONE sign this year, solely because it was full of lies and was on a public street. I didn't steal it, just moved it out of place.
I would not have taken down a Kerry/Edwards sign. I would not have taken ANY sign from someone's private property.
But the point of this article is to show how the radical fringe liberals are the ones taking over the democratic party. Radical conservatives are not in control of the GOP and are still shunned by the majority. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
julsmith
Seaman Recruit
Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 41
Location: Westfield, IN
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | But the point of this article is to show how the radical fringe liberals are the ones taking over the democratic party. Radical conservatives are not in control of the GOP and are still shunned by the majority. |
Good point. I watch a lot of news, and I see far, far less radical conservatives voicing their opinion in the MSM. The voice of reason in the conservative groups far outweighs the radical "hotheads" that just spout off. Being a staunch conservative myself, I'm careful to let people excersize their first amendment rights, so long as it's not physically threatening to others. BUT..............
I'm seeing MUCH more crazy left-wing propaganda showing up in the MSM. So much that I'm getting really concerned. Even my 15 year-old daughter is getting harassed by some of her peers because she's a "conservative". These kids are God-haters, America haters, and haters in general. They worship the earth, evolution, and most of all, themselves. My daughter handles it pretty well, but as a parent, I'm a little nervous. She only sees these kids at a choir she's in, and she homeschools, so at least she's not with these kids all week long. We're seeing, first hand, the future of liberalism. [/list][/list] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Digger
Commander
Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 321
Location: Lakemont,Gerogia
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 5:19 am Post subject: I've seen this comming for quite a few years now. |
|
|
The death of Liberalism is the beginning of the "Age of Reason".
When men think and carefully consider matters, they do not tend to extremes. It is only the lazy man who will not take responsibility for the consequences of his thoughts, words and deeds who embraces extremeism in any matter. The path of wisdom is straight and narrow. A wise man veers neither to the right nor the left lest he fall either into the pit or into the fire.
The Eagle needs both wings in order to fly
Bird who only right wing spins must turn alway a widdershins
Bird who only left wing spins must give to right the final win 
_________________
Hey swifty, I'm with you, Just watch you don't get "Kerry'd away in the propwash
Sgt. Maj. Seamus D.D. MacNemi R.M.C. Ret. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Algesan
Seaman Recruit
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rb325th wrote: | Though I have a question, do you consider Terrorist as only Liberals who have crossed the line? How about Right Wing Extremist? There are zealots on either end of the political spectrum. I have seen some pretty nasty things said and done by people I would not consider remotely "liberal" in their views.
I see this country being squeezed by extremes way too much. |
Ahhhh, the fun of this. Let's have a bit of fun, I'll see if I can remember this. Left/Right is from prerevolutionary France and denotes which side the opponents/supporters of the king sat in whatever the French called their assembly (IIRC, from the view of the chair). It was obsolete by the time someone codified it. French Revolution and all. 
A much more accurate model is a two dimensional one. A case can be made for three (or more), but two covers virtually every position and resolves some of the oddities of the one dimensional L/R model. For example, Nazism/Fascism and Communism/Socialism bear remarkably similar structures, but are mortal enemies. Why? Do the extremes look alike? No, not really, it is just a limit of the L/R model.
If to the traditional Left (liberal)/Right (conservative) axis we add a Statist (State (or group) >> Individual)/ Anarchist (Individual >> State) axis, these problems are resolved. Both Nazis and Communists are extreme Statists although the Nazi ideal is the State as machine (or hive) and the Communist ideal is one of a very egalitarian society. So this makes them 'look alike' (Statist) while being deadly enemies (L/R) since they are different (at least in stated purpose, not interjecting human foibles here).
The problem with the modern liberal (a.k.a - 'mainstream' Democrats) is that they tend to be statists, usually in an extreme manner, while the so-called Reagan Democrats (and many 'mainstream' Republicans) tend to be less statist, trying to find a balance between the state and the individual. One reason normal individuals tend to find liberals so whacked is not so much that they are 'liberal' in the classic sense, but that they are so statist. Their worldview is predicated on State(group) >> Individual and they really cannot understand the difference between an opposing Statist group and a collection of individuals working together for a common cause.
After all, they use front organizations as tools, so all groups against them must also be 'tools' of their enemies. Look at the Vietnam era antiwar groups, the current 'peace' movement and Democratic 527s. All are obviously either willing accomplices or useful fools, therefore from their mindset, groups like this one (SVPT) simply must be willing accomplices or useful fools also. They simply cannot grasp the concept of free men standing together for the common good. They can spout the language, but it is only a game they have learned, they don't know the reality.
Ummm, no linky here. I put this one together myself, but as there is nothing new under the sun, it is just the distillation of my own study.
Oh, for those not familiar with the math term ">>", it means "much greater than". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Digger
Commander
Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 321
Location: Lakemont,Gerogia
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 2:38 pm Post subject: I both agree and disagree with both sides |
|
|
I think of my self as above all considerations of left or right, conservative or liberal. I find the whole matter to be totally a nonsequitor. I am an American and a man who believes in the constitution of the United States of America. I am that before I am anything else.
I am not a "White Anglo Saxon Protestant" and I am not an "Angry White Male". I am a man and a human being who believes in God and the basic dignity of my fellow human beings. I do not believe in or accept labels of any sort. Indeed, the only label I have ever worn or accepted is that of "Seargent in Her Majestys Service, The Royal Marine Corps".
Today I am a citizen of this country and to this country I pledge my loyalty
as I did to the country of my birth. We share a common heritage and a common language and therefore a common future in the world. Let us not forget that.
_________________
Hey swifty, I'm with you, Just watch you don't get "Kerry'd away in the propwash
Sgt. Maj. Seamus D.D. MacNemi R.M.C. Ret. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
