SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why John Kerry is a snake
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doc Jerry
Commander


Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 339

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeh, the point is this guy has lost every argument he's presented and now can't even present any reasonable counter-arguments. He's left with relying on absurd propaganda that is irrelevant.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DADESID
Seaman


Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

>>>Disabled Vietnam veteran Ron Kovic, author of "Born on the Fourth of July," addressed the rally, saying "the same government that paralyzed me and put me in this wheelchair" was killing American and Iraqi boys. <<<

This is the same Ron Kovic, who after a year of killing people in Vietnam from December of 1965 to January of 1967, wrote a letter to the Commandant of the Marine Corps dated May 18, 1967, begging to be ordered back to Vietnam, saying he was "...willing...to give my Marine Corps and my country 100 percent of my abilities and then some. I love my country above all else and am ready now as before to place my life, if need be at the service of my flag."

He knew what war was about... until he got on the receiving end.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tony
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 119
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

abartholomaus wrote:
What kind of proof is a pay stub???

So you have managed to show that Kerry's military history has as many quirks as Bushes. I guess it is all a mater of opinion in the end.


So let's discuss Kerry's Service Record. It's available on his web site. You can find them here:

http://www.johnkerry.com/about/john_kerry/military_records.html

I found them very interesting and especially enjoyed reading his FITREPS which tell a great deal about the man. As a Department head, I used to write FITREPS and as a Junior Officer, I also received FITREPS. For those who are unaware, a FITREP, or Fitness Report, is the performance evaluation for Naval Officers. They are drafted on a regular basis and also when completing an assignment. The drafting of FITREPS is a very formal process and to someone who doesn't know how to read them, they would tend to all look alike, filled with praise and flowery language. In fact, they are written in a way to signal selection boards as to whom should be promoted and who should be eligible for command, which for an unrestricted line officer like John Kerry (and myself) was the ultimate goal for junior officers wishing to make the Navy a career.

There is an interesting analysis on the Swift Boat site which goes into some of the trends and patterns in John Kerry's FITREPS, so I will only mention a few items that caught my eye when I read through them.

1. John Kerry didn't stay in any one place very long during his brief Naval service - so most of his FITREPS are of the not observed type and are just a formality since one of the rules of FITREPS is a continuous chain.

2. Where he did stay in one place for awhile, there is a lot of information that can be gleaned. His first FITREP aboard the GRIDLEY covers only a short period from June to August 1967 while the ship was conducting maintenance and was pretty much tied to the pier. In this FITREP, Kerry received all outstandings and some standard language that he's a great officer who in "three months" has made a fantastic contribution. The translation here is that - we haven't done much and it's only been a short time - but Ensign Kerry has not done anything wrong. As would be expected of a hard charging JO, he is recommended for accelerated promotion and Destroyer School and a Department Head billet (the normal next steps for a JO who will rise through the ranks). He also received no adverse marks (meaning less than outstanding). Ensign Kerry is off to a good start on GRIDLEY .

3. Next FITREP on GRIDLEY ....Sep 67 to Mar 68...now the ship is operating in the Southern California OPAREA and near the end of this period the ship is en route to the 7th fleet, meaning Westpac or put another way - is deployed in a high state of readiness and headed for somewhere in or around Viet Nam. This FITREP still has outstanding marks and he is recommended for Destroyer School and Riverine Craft, so he is still on track here. Comments are okay and he is still recommended for accelerated promotion, although the FITREP notes that he still hasn't qualified as Officer of the Deck (OOD) Underway, which would be the first and foremost goal of a seagoing junior officer, since he is almost a burden to the rest of the wardroom until he can pull his weight standing bridge watches. Still - given that he has been aboard since the previous summer, it is not unreasonable that at this point, he has still not qualified as OOD(U) (although many JOs including your truly would have by now), so this doesn't mean much. Ensign Kerry is still more or less on track.

4. The next FITREP on GRIDLEY , for the period from Mar -Jul 68 is the one I find most interesting. At this point, it appears the young Ensign Kerry has either done something really stupid or made someone really mad. In this FITREP he is pretty much blasted by the CO and I would maintain that this one is bad enough, that any aspirations for a Department Head tour and eventual Command would have pretty much ended here, which is very unusual. Most JOs do not get such negative FITREPS early on. If you read it, of course, it may not seem negative, but there are some very specific signs.

-- He is now recommended for PAO school instead of Destroyer School. This is a huge negative. His outstanding marks (which are pretty much a requirement for the average officer) are now lowered, several notches in some cases which screams...."Dirtbag" to use the popular term that we would have used when I was a JO. Most brutal, however, are the CO’s comments which are extremely negative. I will quote and comment:

"LTJG Kerry is an intelligent and competent young Naval Officer..."

"Competent" is a terrible word and could be compared with the words "barely adequate" --- you never wanted to see this word on your FITREP - likewise, "young" means immature

"....who has performed his duties in an excellent to outstanding manner."

Another huge negative here...you don't want to be "excellent to outstanding" you want to be "superb" or "top notch". "Excellent to Outstanding" implies "pretty good, most of the time.

"He is industrious and eager to learn..."

Meaning there is a lot he doesn't know.

"...and applies himself with vigor to assigned tasks"

Meaning he shows little initiative and only does what he is told.

"He presents a very neat appearance and meets people well."

Meaning he is not much of a Naval Officer but he looks good in his uniform and can talk a good line.

"For his age and experience he writes and speaks exceedingly well"

Meaning he is young and immature but well schooled.

"His performance as ships PAO officer has been outstanding"

Meaning that although we are operational and at sea, there is nothing about his seamanship skills or main job that warrants a positive comment (public affairs is a collateral or part time duty that would have no responsibilities while at sea) - or put another way - he is a terrible 1st LT (the officer in charge of the deck hands) but at least he was a good public affairs officer even though we didn't conduct any public affairs.

"He has great potential...."

This is the absolute kiss of death in a FITREP - it means you are doing lousy and perhaps if a miracle occurs, you might someday rise above the mediocre level that you are now peforming at - JOs were supposed to realize their potential in Officer Training not aboard ship - where they should already be performing well beyond their capabilities...

"...and should develop into an outstanding officer in a minimum amount of time."

Meaning he is currently a lousy officer.

"His performance of duty significantly contributed to GRIDLEY receiving the attached commendatory message and correspondence."

Meaining we will not be giving him the standard Navy Acheivement Medal that is awarded to a JO who detaches from the ship who has done a good job, because in fact, he has not done a good job.

"He is recommended for promotion"

Meaining he is not recommended for accelerated promotion which is code for he is not ready to be promoted and may never be ready.

The remainder of his FITREPS also have some hints that Mr. Kerry was a pretty mediocre Naval Officer (average marks, for example) but to me, this FITREP received when leaving Gridley tells a great deal about the man who wants to be our President and Commander in Chief.

Perhaps some will think I am reaching here or splitting straws - but any of you who also served in a similar capacity, will recognize my commentary as on target.
_________________

http://tonyk.smugmug.com/photos/1822816-L-1.jpg
USN 1983-1992


Last edited by Tony on Sat Jul 24, 2004 4:56 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ASPB
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1680

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 4:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rings perpectfully true Tony, based upon my time in the Navy.

It would be really helpful if you would do similar analyses of the in-country Fitreps. It's possible we can have them posted "up front" and distributed for publication in the blogsphere.

Tom
_________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GoophyDog
PO1


Joined: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 480
Location: Washington - The Evergreen State

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 7:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What I find very interesting is that in the 6 to 7 months while the ship was able to be underway, he had not qualified as an OOD. Especially true if he was in charge of the deck gang and probably had some outstanding chiefs to learn from. The ship had just completed yards or dock side maintenance so let's face it, there wasn't that much to do underway and the PAO collateral would be next to nothing.

Shoot, even as a lowly RM1 in a two man shack I snagged that designator; granted it was open ocean steaming on a buoy tender but I darn well did it!

I've known many an ensign/jg that were sunk by just the wording and lack of mention in their FITREPS.

Yep, the last hurrah from the Gridley was a kiss of death and the only thing he could do to rescue his potential career were some "dashing" and "daring" exploits. Failing that, he would have to be the aide of all aides to an area commander to pull his tail out of the bucket. Hmmm, looks like he tried on the first bit and failed on the second. Scarey.
_________________
Why ask? Because it needs asking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tony
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 119
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The OOD qual is quite telling. I qualified in about 4 to 5 months in an identical operating environment and received my Surface Warfare Qualification (SWO) before I pinned on my JG bars. For those of us on front line combatants (I was a Division Officer and Department Head on a Cruiser and then a Department Head on a Hydrofoil) this was the expectation. We prided ourselves on being line officers and 'war fighters' and we held ourselves to much higher standards.

Also, due to the size of our ships and manning, there was a great deal of pressure to qualify quickly, since until this first important quailification is acheived, there was no way to really pull one's weight on the watch bill. In some case, not qualifying would mean that a LT who is working on his Tactical Action Officer qual in the Combat Information Center, would be held up in his progress due to the requirement to stand bridge watches for some slacking Ensign who can't make the grade. Any Ensign with half a clue, knew that taking your time with this qual was not a way to win friends and influence people. Still, some ships had COs that were very tough on awarding OOD (U), so the time it took Mr. Kerry could perhaps not be unreasonable.

Tom - I will take a look at the others in more detail when I have a moment. Lots of interesting stuff in all of them when you read between the lines although this particular one has the most information. I actuallly had a fellow JO with a FITREP almost exactly like the one I have reviewed here and he was passed over for LT and forced out of the Navy - quite a dubious accomplishment during the 600 ship Navy days when I served.
_________________

http://tonyk.smugmug.com/photos/1822816-L-1.jpg
USN 1983-1992
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm almost positive that I read that Kerry was OOD qual'd, underway and in port.

Did I hallucinate something? I don't think so, but hey, give me enough coffee and anything's possible. Wink

I think it was on one of his Gridley fitreps (thanks for the excellent breakdown of those bullets, by the way - most civilians don't know how "poisonous" some of those seemingly innocuous or even complimentary phrases really are!)

But, it could have been on the Kerry web site.

Haven't been there lately, cause I always feel like I need to take a shower after I read there a while.

Eeeew. Ick.

Wink
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DADESID
Seaman


Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 10:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

>>>4. The next FITREP on GRIDLEY , for the period from Mar -Jul 68 is the one I find most interesting. At this point, it appears the young Ensign Kerry has either done something really stupid or made someone really mad. In this FITREP he is pretty much blasted by the CO and I would maintain that this one is bad enough, that any aspirations for a Department Head tour and eventual Command would have pretty much ended here, which is very unusual. Most JOs do not get such negative FITREPS early on.<<<Tony

Agree. The 23MAR68-20JUL68 FITREP from USS Gridley is horrible, and should have been a kiss of death for his career.

The COSDIV11 FITREP for the period 14DEC68-26MAR69 is not so hot, either. Parse the words if you like, but you really just have to look at the marks. I recall preparing a FITREP on an officer with marks like these ones.

I got called in and was told, "You're killing this guy, are you sure that's what you want to do?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tony
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 119
Location: Jacksonville, FL

PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read in our local paper (the wonderful Florida Times Union with an editorial page that rivals the WSJ for quality) that Kerry's nickname on Gridley was "Beatle" in reference to his long hair and Beatles like hair style. I know ithe boys from Liverpool are pretty tame at least in hindsight, but at the time, I'm not sure that's a nickname I would have wanted aboard ship. Our guy with a similar FITREP to Kerry was nicknamed "Baby Huey" since us other JOs were always taking care of him and trying to keep him out of trouble - this is a guy who got in a fist fight with the CHENG (Chief Engineer) on the quarter deck during a port call...he was an idiot (IMHO)....

At Yale they nicknamed Mr. Kerry John Fitzgerald Kerry due to his Kennedy fixation and the same article mentioned that he told some of his crew in the Navy that he would be the next JFK. I'm sure they were loving that....I can hear the enlisted guys now..."Sir, that's great that you want to be the next JFK...I just want to get the job done and go home to my wife and kids and be myself..."
_________________

http://tonyk.smugmug.com/photos/1822816-L-1.jpg
USN 1983-1992
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group