SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

IWO JIMA--lessons for us 60 years later.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
shawa
CNO


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 2004

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:54 pm    Post subject: IWO JIMA--lessons for us 60 years later. Reply with quote

"As long as Americans cherish the memory of those who served at
Iwo Jima, and grasp the crucial lesson they offer all free societies, the
totalitarians will never win."



From The Wall Street Journal:

Quote:
Iwo Jima
The famous battle offers lessons for us 60 years later.

BY ARTHUR HERMAN
Saturday, February 19, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST

Sixty years ago today, more than 110,000 Americans and 880 ships began their assault on a small volcanic island in the Pacific, in the climactic battle of the last year of World War II. For the next 36 days Iwo Jima would become the most populous 7 1/2 square miles on the planet, as U.S. Marines and Japanese soldiers fought a battle that would test American resolve even more than D-Day or the Battle of the Bulge had, and that still symbolizes a free society's willingness to make the sacrifice necessary to prevail over evil--a sacrifice as relevant today as it was 60 years ago.

The attack on Iwo Jima capped a two-year island-hopping campaign that was as controversial with politicians and the press as any Rumsfeld strategy. Each amphibious assault had been bloodier than the last: at Tarawa, where 3,000 ill-prepared Marines fell taking an island of just three square miles; at Saipan, where Army troops performed so poorly two of their generals had to be fired; and Peleliu, where it took 10 weeks of fighting in 115-degree heat to root out the last Japanese defenders, at the cost of 6,000 soldiers and Marines.

Iwo Jima would be the first island of the Japanese homeland to be attacked. The Japanese had put in miles of tunnels and bunkers, with 361 artillery pieces, 65 heavy mortars, 33 large naval guns, and 21,000 defenders determined to fight to the death. Their motto was, "kill 10 of the enemy before dying." American commanders expected 40% casualties on the first assault. "We have taken such losses before," remarked the Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Holland M. Smith, "and if we have to, we can do it again."

Even before the attack, the Navy's bombardment of Iwo Jima cost more ships and men than it lost on D-Day, without making a significant dent in the Japanese defenses. Then, beginning at 9 a.m. on the 19th, Marines loaded down with 70 to 100 pounds of equipment each hit the beach, and immediately sank into the thick volcanic ash. They found themselves on a barren moonscape stripped of any cover or vegetation, where Japanese artillery could pound them with unrelenting fury. Scores of wounded Marines helplessly waiting to be evacuated off the beach were killed "with the greatest possible violence," as veteran war reporter Robert Sherrod put it. Shells tore bodies in half and scattered arms and legs in all directions, while so much underground steam rose from the churned up soil the survivors broke up C-ration crates to sit on in order to keep from being scalded. Some 2,300 Marines were killed or wounded in the first 18 hours. It was, Sherrod said, "a nightmare in hell."
And overlooking it all, rising 556 feet above the carnage, stood Mount Suribachi, where the Japanese could direct their fire along the entire beach. Taking Suribachi became the key to victory. It took four days of bloody fighting to reach the summit, and when Marines did, they planted an American flag. When it was replaced with a larger one, photographer Joe Rosenthal recorded the scene--the most famous photograph of World War II and the most enduring symbol of a modern democracy at war.

Yet, in the end, a symbol of what? Certainly not victory. The capture of Suribachi only marked the beginning of the battle for Iwo Jima, which dragged on for another month and cost nearly 26,000 men--all for an island whose future as a major air base never materialized. Forty men were in the platoon which raised the flag on Suribachi. Only four would survive the battle unhurt. Their company, E Company, Second Battalion, 28th Regiment, Fifth Marine Division, would suffer 75% casualties. Of the seven officers who led it into battle, only one was left when it was over.

But the Marines pushed on. Over the next agonizing weeks, they took the rest of the island yard by yard, bunker by bunker, cave by cave. They fought through places with names like "Bloody Gorge" and "The Meat Grinder." They learned to take no prisoners in fighting a skilled and fanatical enemy who gave no quarter and expected none. Twenty out of every 21 Japanese defenders would die where they stood. One in three Marines on Iwo Jima would either be killed or wounded, including 19 of 24 battalion commanders. Twenty-seven Marines and naval medical corpsmen would win Medals of Honor--more than in any other battle in history--and 13 of them posthumously. As Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Command, said, "Among the Americans who served on Iwo Island, uncommon valor was a common virtue."

Yet even this valor and sacrifice is not the full story of what Iwo Jima means, or what Rosenthal's immortal photograph truly symbolizes. The lesson of Iwo Jima is in fact an ancient one, going back to Machiavelli: that sometimes free societies must be as tough and unrelenting as their enemies. Totalitarians test their opponents by generating extreme conditions of brutality and violence; in those conditions--in the streets and beheadings of Fallujah or on the beach and in the bunkers of Iwo Jima--they believe weak democratic nerves will crack. This in turn demonstrates their moral superiority: that by giving up their own decency and humanity they have become stronger than those who have not.
Free societies can afford only one response. There were no complicated legal issues or questions of "moral equivalence" on Iwo Jima: It was kill or be killed. That remains the nature of war even for democratic societies. The real question is, who outlasts whom. In 1945 on Iwo Jima, it was the Americans, as the monument at Arlington Cemetery, based on Rosenthal's photograph, proudly attests. In the jungles of Vietnam and Cambodia in the 1970s, it was the totalitarians--with terrible consequences.

Today, some in this country think the totalitarians may still win in Iraq and elsewhere. A few even hope so. Only one thing is certain: As long as Americans cherish the memory of those who served at Iwo Jima, and grasp the crucial lesson they offer all free societies, the totalitarians will never win.

Mr. Herman, a historian, is the author, most recently, of "To Rule the Waves: How the British Navy Shaped the Modern World" (HarperCollins, 2004).


http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110006317


Last edited by shawa on Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A slight correction is in order. Iwo was not intended to be a major base. It became a stop for crippled B-29s returning from Japan. The 1st B-29 landed when fighting was still going on. Otherwise returning bombers would have had to ditch far short of their base. On Iwo they could be repaired and refueled to return to Tinian and other bases rather than lost. The saving of men and planes was significant. There were other strategic reasons as well.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Poole
Vice Admiral


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 914
Location: America

PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've heard several times that we lost about 7,000 Marines and Sailors on Iwo Jima and saved about 7,000 Airmen. The conclusion that we broke even doesn't work because 22,000 of the enemy also were killed there.
_________________
'58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue9t3
Admiral


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 1246
Location: oregon

PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it was important for Iwo to be our gas station, and more than that it was important that it was'nt Tojo's. (domino affect)
_________________
MOPAR-BUYER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tom Poole wrote:
I've heard several times that we lost about 7,000 Marines and Sailors on Iwo Jima and saved about 7,000 Airmen. The conclusion that we broke even doesn't work because 22,000 of the enemy also were killed there.


There are still several thousand Japanese entombed in the caves and tunnels. There were two or three that lived in there and did not come out till 2 or 3 years after the war was over. It was also a huge blow to the Japanese morale as it was considered the first of Japan's territory.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
I B Squidly
Vice Admiral


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 879
Location: Cactus Patch

PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GM Strong wrote:
Quote:

Iwo was not intended to be a major base. It became a stop for crippled B-29s returning from Japan.


True and not true. Iwo was never to be a major base but it was not needed for returning planes but to rescue cripples outbound from Tinian. The B29 had a long shakeout period. While it would prove invulnerable over Japan getting there could be a problem. Serious mechanical problems would reveal themselves after takeoff the first several months of operation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wwIIvetsdaughter
Captain


Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 513
Location: McAllen, Texas

PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 2:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Clint Eastwood is preparing a film based on the book "Flags of Our Fathers" written by the son of one of the flag-raisers on Iwo Jima. I hope Eastwood shows it like it really was, worse (if that is possible) than even Normandy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I B Squidly wrote:
GM Strong wrote:
Quote:

Iwo was not intended to be a major base. It became a stop for crippled B-29s returning from Japan.


True and not true. Iwo was never to be a major base but it was not needed for returning planes but to rescue cripples outbound from Tinian. The B29 had a long shakeout period. While it would prove invulnerable over Japan getting there could be a problem. Serious mechanical problems would reveal themselves after takeoff the first several months of operation.


Iwo Jima airfield took in somewhat over 2,500 B-29 landings before the war was over according to data.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wing Wiper
Rear Admiral


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iwo Jima might not have ever been intended as a major B-29 base, but we stationed a lot of P-51 Mustangs there and they could be used to provide escort for the B-29's, as well as serving as an emergency field for damaged bombers that could make it that far back after being damaged. The Japanese were also using the radar on Iwo to provide early warning of B-29 raids to Japan, giving their fighters enough time to climb to altitude and intercept our bombers. I'd say taking Iwo saved more than 7,000 lives if you take all that into consideration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wing Wiper wrote:
Iwo Jima might not have ever been intended as a major B-29 base, but we stationed a lot of P-51 Mustangs there and they could be used to provide escort for the B-29's, as well as serving as an emergency field for damaged bombers that could make it that far back after being damaged. The Japanese were also using the radar on Iwo to provide early warning of B-29 raids to Japan, giving their fighters enough time to climb to altitude and intercept our bombers. I'd say taking Iwo saved more than 7,000 lives if you take all that into consideration.


Very good additional points. The saving in lives could be bumped to over 20,000 easily. It was definatly usful as a forward fighter base as well as Emergency landing base. If I am not mistaken it was about half way from the bases at Tinain and Saipan. The anniversary of the flag raising on Mt. Suribachi was 2/23. Semper Fi to all you Marines and to my nephew and his guys in the 2/8.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RiflemanDD730
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 96

PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's not forget that the cover of John Kerry's book "The New Soldier" showed a picture of Kerry and his cohorts mocking the flag raising on Iwo Jima with an upside down American flag and Kerry and his group posing as the flag raisers. I wonder if Kerry went to the Marine memorial commemorating the flag raising to pay his "respects"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jerald L. Parsoneault
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 29 Sep 2004
Posts: 144
Location: Sacramento

PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RiflemanDD730 wrote. . .
Quote:
Let's not forget that the cover of John Kerry's book "The New Soldier" showed a picture of Kerry and his cohorts mocking the flag raising on Iwo Jima with an upside down American flag and Kerry and his group posing as the flag raisers.

Thanks for the important reminder that Kerry is a man without honor, a disgrace to veterans, and a feigner of patriotism when he thinks it's to his advantage.

Nalt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group