SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Death sentence by jury that discussed Bible thrown out

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Rdtf
CNO


Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 2209
Location: BUSHville

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:38 pm    Post subject: Death sentence by jury that discussed Bible thrown out Reply with quote

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/29/bible.deliberations.ap/index.html

Quote:
Death sentence by jury that discussed Bible thrown out
Tuesday, March 29, 2005 Posted: 8:24 AM EST (1324 GMT)

DENVER, Colorado (AP) -- Ruling that juries cannot turn to the Bible for advice during deliberations, a divided Colorado Supreme Court threw out the death penalty for a convicted murderer because jurors discussed Bible verses.

In a 3-2 vote on Monday, justices ordered Robert Harlan to serve life without parole for kidnapping Rhonda Maloney and raping her at gunpoint for two hours before fatally shooting her.

Authorities said Maloney, a 25-year-old cocktail waitress, was on her way home from work at a casino. Harlan later admitted killing her, but said he was addled by cocaine, alcohol and rage.

Harlan was sentenced to death in 1995, but defense lawyers learned that five jurors had looked up such Bible verses as "eye for eye, tooth for tooth," copied them and discussed them while deliberating behind closed doors.

Defense attorney Kathleen Lord, arguing before the state Supreme Court last month, said the jurors had gone outside the law. "They went to the Bible to find out God's position on capital punishment," she said.

Prosecutors countered, saying jurors should be allowed to refer to the Bible or other religious texts during deliberations.

Monday's ruling said the Bible and other religious writings are considered "codes of law by many" in Colorado. But noting that it takes a unanimous jury to impose a death sentence here, the court said "at least one juror in this case could have been influenced by these authoritative passages ... when he or she may otherwise have voted for a life sentence."

In their dissent, Justices Nancy Rice and Rebecca Love Kourlis said the evidence did not show biblical passages influenced jurors. "It is important to note that the concept of extraneous information does not include the general knowledge a juror brings to court," Rice wrote.

Gov. Bill Owens said Monday's ruling was "demeaning to people of faith and prevents justice from being served."

Prosecutors were reviewing the decision and could ask the state Supreme Court to reconsider or could appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Jay Horowitz, a former assistant U.S. attorney and former University of Denver law professor, said the law bars jurors from considering evidence not presented at trial.

But he noted it was unreasonable to expect them to set aside moral standards when they step into a jury room, though there must be limits. "In fact, people do bring their background and thoughts and impressions, and you can't separate from that, and shouldn't try to," he said.

The conservative Christian group, Focus on the Family, had sharp criticism for the court.

"Today's ruling further confirms that the judicial branch of our government is nearly bereft of any moral foundation," said Tom Minnery, the group's vice president for government and public policy.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tanya
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why am I not surprised. Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony54
PO2


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 369
Location: cleveland, ohio

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Roman Empire did not fall till they started destroying the Christians.
Executing them, feeding them to the lions, starving them to death?

The USA is today's version of the Roman Empire.
The politically correct ones hate and despise Christians, if they can force us to slaughter millions of unborn children, soon they will be slaughtering millions of seniors, invalids and unwanted humans.
Politicians won't order it, they can be replaced.
Federal Judges responsible to no one will do it with "case law", Terri's case proves they will override the will of the politicians, and then it becomes "law", just like "Roe vs. Wade"
And I fear it will be the end of the USA Empire, like the Romans we will self destruct.
(Sad but true)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group