SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

London Judge-critically ill child will be allowed to die??

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SBD
Admiral


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 1022

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:55 pm    Post subject: London Judge-critically ill child will be allowed to die?? Reply with quote

Ruling means critically ill child will be allowed to die

By Sue Leeman
ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050422/news_1n22judge.html
April 22, 2005

LONDON – Rejecting a bid by the parents, a British judge yesterday upheld a court order allowing doctors to let a critically ill baby die if she stops breathing – a move doctors say is the only humane way to end the child's suffering.

Eighteen-month-old Charlotte Wyatt can hardly see or hear and weighed about a pound when she was born prematurely. Her brain and other organs are so seriously damaged that she has"no feeling other than continuing pain," according to physicians.

Darren and Debbie Wyatt, who believe in preserving life at any cost, sought to overturn a court order granted in October.

But Justice Mark Hedley was not persuaded by the parents' pleas.

"I am quite clear that it would not be in Charlotte's best interests to die in the course of futile aggressive treatment," Hedley ruled yesterday at London's High Court.

Hedley said he would review the order again, probably in October.

If the baby stops breathing, she will be given treatment except for invasive routines of intubation and ventilation – "but nothing further," Hedley said.

The case echoes that of Terri Schiavo, a Florida woman in a vegetative state whose parents and husband fought over whether she should be allowed to die. She died March 31, almost two weeks after her feeding tube was removed by court order.

Similar cases in Britain have been rare. In 1993, the family of Tony Bland, a young man left in a persistent vegetative state by a soccer stadium disaster, fought unsuccessfully in court to stop doctors from removing his feeding tube.

Terminally ill baby Luke Winston-Jones died in November after the High Court ruled that his doctors could withhold lifesaving treatment, against the wishes of his parents, if his condition deteriorated.

Both cases sparked fierce debate about medical ethics and the rights of doctors and parents.

Although the Wyatt case is not the first time doctors and parents have ended up in a British court in such situations, previous hearings have been held in private.

Charlotte's parents and the Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust agreed to its being held in the open court because they felt it was in the public interest.

Charlotte was born in October 2003, just six months into her mother's pregnancy. She has had serious heart and lung problems, has never left the hospital and is fed through a tube and lives in an oxygen tent.

She has stopped breathing three times, and in October the High Court ruled that doctors at St. Mary's Hospital in Portsmouth, southwest England, do not need to resuscitate her if she stops breathing again.

The Wyatts say Charlotte can see and hear to a limited extent and sometimes smiles.

Most ridiculous statement I've ever heard.
"no feeling other than continuing pain," according to physicians.
How can they know this??

SBD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group