|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Harvuskong Seaman
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Essayons wrote: | Lots of good questions and input so let me add some of my own. Check out the two documents posted by rbshirley on May 20th.
http://pcf45.com/discharge.jpg Kerry’s discharge dated FEB 16 1976
http://pcf45.com/other_discharge.jpg Another officer’s discharge dated MAR 12 1974
(snip)
The one item that is redacted in the Kerry document possibly might have been something like “para - - XXXX.” I have no idea what XXXX is.
The bulk of the Kerry document is boiler plate. The date, To:, Via: and signature block information were typed into the document.
(snip)
Regards,
Dick |
After looking closer and comparing this two documents, I have found two interesting items.
1. In the Kerry doc, the second line above the date line is blacked out
2. In the other officer's doc the first line above the date line is blacked out.
If the blacked out line in the other officer's doc was his ID Number, then the unblacked out line above the dateline on Kerry's doc could be his ID number or someone else's. I counted 8 numbers in the line just above the dateline on Kerry's doc. Could that be an ID Number?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Essayons Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 81 Location: Philadelphia area
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Harvuskong,
I know that I had posted that I would not continue to post in this thread but your above post brought something new to light regarding the Kerry document redaction.
First let me address the 8 numbers you refer to. My best read is “?1??0800” with the possibility of “?1250800.” If the Navy used the same convention as the Army for service numbers, then the first character should be an “O” but it does not look to be “O.” By 1978 the Navy should have been using SSNs, including hyphens, as the Army did on my discharge in 1972.
The redaction is what caught my eye (I was viewing the document at 500% magnification) since the redaction appeared to scale too perfectly. It was scaling like a vector graphic (no loss/distortion of its edges) created in Adobe Illustrator. Hmmm. I then put a grid over the document and ran the magnification to 1,600%. The redaction edges were still perfect (razor sharp and perfectly straight) AND they were PERFECTLY aligned with the grid.
The document itself is slightly rotated clockwise, which I already knew about, and the boiler-plate text does not line up exactly with the grid – close but not perfect.
My current conclusion: There is no doubt that the Kerry discharge document, in part, was manipulated using Adobe Illustrator in conjunction with Adobe Photoshop.
Why? I do not know but it sure would have been easier, assuming the document is the original Navy document, to scan and print it and redact the one item with a Sharpie and scan it again for posting – done.
Regards,
Dick _________________ Essayons - Let us try - the code of the Army Engineer. Sappers First, the code of the Combat Engineer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Essayons Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 81 Location: Philadelphia area
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Update:
I may be able to replicate the above referenced redaction in Photoshop and therefore not need to use Illustrator. Should know by tomorrow.
Should anyone need to view/manipulate the Kerry document that I use, it can be found at: http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/jkerry/hondisres.pdf
Regards,
Dick _________________ Essayons - Let us try - the code of the Army Engineer. Sappers First, the code of the Combat Engineer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DADESID Seaman
Joined: 07 Jul 2004 Posts: 157
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the numbers above the date are file numbers and Standard Subject Identification Codes (SSIC) which fit correspondence into a standard Directive category, for filing purposes.
I do not believe they have any connection to any individual, but rather to a subject. Why they would be redacted is a mystery to me... unless they might refer to a governing subject which could raise questions.
I don't know for sure. Any YNs or PNs out there? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
3rd gen Navy Lieutenant
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 227 Location: Gainesville, Fl.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bump _________________ Warm Regards,
Sean G. Smith,
RN, BSN, EMT-B, U.S. Navy, 1994 - 2003.
BS Biology, Business Administration, Nursing
The Deal with Life: Make decisions based on what you might gain, not on what you may lose.
!!!!!! LET THE WILD RUMPUS BEGIN !!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Harvuskong Seaman
Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I have found another source for fonts. It is the following below:
http://www.creamundo.com/index.php?lang=en
Part of the research on the Discharge Papers centered on Fonts in the attempts to duplicate it with the various programs mentioned in the earlier posts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|