SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Florida Judge Forbids Voter Education

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Schadow
Vice Admiral


Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Huntsville, Alabama

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:24 am    Post subject: Florida Judge Forbids Voter Education Reply with quote

Election officials in Florida's 16th congressional district wanted to post signs at the district's polling places to inform voters whom they would be voting for since the ballots still carried Mark Foley's name. The signs would have read, "Marking your ballot for Tim Mahoney (D) will be a vote for Tim Mahoney (D). Marking your ballot for Mark Foley (R) will be a vote for Joe Negron (R)".

It's pretty universal, and reasonable, that "electioneering" signs cannot be posted within 100 feet of polling places. Electioneering means trying to persuade voters to vote for a particular candidate. Calling attention to a flaw in the ballots should, IMO, rightfully be called "voter education".

Democrats predictably went to court and Circuit Judge Janet Ferris predictably ruled in their favor, defining "voter education" as instruction in operating voting machines, etc. An especially egregious effect of this ruling is that troops in the field or overseas voting absentee will be clueless about this glitch unless a relative or buddy lets them know the score.

So, unless appeals overturn this outrage, the Dems will have scored a really big scam. First, timing the 'outing' of the Foley thing after the deadline for reprinting ballots; then getting a ruling by a sympathetic judge against a reasonable, apolitical sign. And our absentee troops, who are already marking ballots, will be discriminated against.

Democrats, champions of voter education? Only when it suits them.

The full story can be found in today's Jacksonville Commercial Appeal.

Schadow
_________________
Capt, 8th U.S. Army, Korea '53 - '54
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
streetsweeper95B
PO2


Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 365
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I liked this part, at least someone at the DOD is on the ball:


"The Department of Defense Federal Voting Assistance Program issued a news release explaining the situation. It then was e-mailed by the State Department to many overseas voters including troops stationed in Iraq.

Negron issued his own news release that quoted an Iraq veteran, Marine Cpl. David Snyder, as saying Mahoney "should be ashamed of his disgraceful efforts to keep our fighting men and women overseas in the dark."

A Mahoney spokeswoman did not immediately comment."

She's afraid she'd sink her dinky lil raft or something? lol
_________________
"Proud Member of the Freak Show"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schadow
Vice Admiral


Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Huntsville, Alabama

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

An update to this uphill fight is provided by Byron York writing in National Review Online today. Early voting is taking place and there's some evidence that publicity has had a positive effect.

Quote:
<snip>

Negron’s supporters say he has to concentrate on three things between now and Election Day. One, he has to explain to voters how they can actually vote for Negron — “Punch Foley for Joe.” Two, he has to introduce himself to those voters who don’t know him. And three, he has to hammer away at Democrat Mahoney’s “moderate façade,” in the words of [GOP consultant Todd] Harris, so that voters “will realize this is a guy who’s being supported by Hillary Clinton, who will vote for Nancy Pelosi as speaker, and whose values are not the same as the 16th District’s.”

There are signs Negron is having some success, at least in the first mission. Early voting has begun in the district, and local media reports suggest there hasn’t been much confusion. “Many people leaving the [polling place] said they understood that Foley’s name was still on the ballot because of Florida’s election laws, but that a vote for Foley counted toward Republican replacement candidate Joe Negron,” the Sarasota Herald-Tribune reported yesterday after a visit to a precinct in Port Charlotte. “It’s been all over the news,” one resident told the paper. “We heard plenty about it.”

In the end, it may prove that the panicky predictions made in the first hours of the Foley scandal will prove wrong, and this solidly Republican area — Foley won his last campaign with 68 percent of the vote — will stick with the GOP. “The fact is, this is a Republican district,” says Todd Harris. “Most voters do not think that the solution to the Foley problem is to send a liberal Democrat to Washington.”


So Negron has a fighting chance. If he wins a close one, you can bet the lawsuits will start flying.

Schadow
_________________
Capt, 8th U.S. Army, Korea '53 - '54
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Democrat obsession with regaining power combined with not very well thought out over-reaches has scored yet another coup for the GOP. Had they just kept their litigious mouths shut, the placing of non-partisan "voter education" information would have been a non-event.

Now, just as in 2000 with their blatant attempt to negate military write-in votes, the jackasses have blackened their own eyes and, by elevating the issue, helped to educate (and perhaps energize) the GOP voting population.

Well done Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NortonPete
PO2


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 385

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
The Democrat obsession with regaining power combined with not very well thought out over-reaches has scored yet another coup for the GOP. Had they just kept their litigious mouths shut, the placing of non-partisan "voter education" information would have been a non-event.

Now, just as in 2000 with their blatant attempt to negate military write-in votes, the jackasses have blackened their own eyes and, by elevating the issue, helped to educate (and perhaps energize) the GOP voting population.

Well done Laughing


Well stated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group