SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Where do they get off?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:17 pm    Post subject: Where do they get off? Reply with quote

In from Don Bendell, and yeah I'm including his signature

LA Times

Dear Mr. Whitefield;

Congratulations. You have taken left wing journalism, even left coast journalism, to a new low with your tasteless, low-class article filled with Hollywood and Media-borne stereotypes of Vietnam veterans. My son who just served as a Green Beret weapons sergeant in Iraq does indeed have a Harley, a fancy chopper no less. Although I served as a Green Beret in Vietnam in 1968-1969, I hate motorcycles and would never own one. Another son earning his Green Beret at Fort Bragg will be going to Iraq this year, and has no intention of owning a bike, either. Gee, I guess that makes us all veterans and Americans who simply have a right to own motorcycles, doesn’t it. Your pony-tail, camouflage-fatigue wearing, bearded, drug-influenced, beer swilling, Easy Rider-looking image of Vietnam veterans is simply that, a Hollywood image. In fact, 8 out of 9 of those so-called Vietnam veterans you run into never even served in the military.

In regards to your remark that we are all angry because we lost that war. I don’t see Vietnam having to build a wall along their border to keep people from flooding into their country. Some countries like Vietnam have secret police and border patrols to keep their oppressed citizenry within their borders. We are in a quandary about how to keep people out because we have so much to offer. I don’t know if you have noticed but Hanoi would give every US statesmen a hooker and a case of whiskey if they thought it would further their goal of just getting some more free trade with us.

The American military won every major battle we fought in the Vietnam War, especially the 1968 Tet Offensive, but bass-voiced, pipe-smoking, grandfatherly Walter Cronkite declared the Tet Offensive a North Vietnamese victory and like the mindless, follow-the-leader wannabe journalists that most of the media elitists like you are, you all picked up on that and played the story to the hilt. In fact, leader of all North Vietnamese forces and outstanding military strategist General Vo Nguyen Giap wrote in his memoirs that the 1968 Tet Offensive broke the back of the NVA (North Vietnamese Army), and they suffered staggering losses and were ready to surrender to the US, however the US anti-war machine, with the US media greasing the gears was in full operations, and gave them hope, so he said in his own words they decided to hang on with bloody fingertips and hope the anti-war demonstrations would help them stay until eventual victory.

Sure we were never celebrated like other American war veterans, but we do not need short-sighted idiots like you to make us feel validated. I was there to serve God, my country, and an ideal, an American ideal that has much greater import than your misinformed opinion. Wasn’t it amazing how all those countries ravaged by the tidal waves a few years ago, those African nations dealing with an AID crisis, and the truly oppressed all over the world always turn to the country of Vietnam to bring in the Red Cross, volunteers, money, and assistance? I mean after all, they kicked our butts didn’t they? To the victors go the spoils and that shining spot of human freedom and personal dignity, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is what all countries want to be just like, according to your thinking.

We Vietnam veterans, the real ones, who have a higher per capita income level, education level, and lower arrest rates than any other large group of Americans of the same age, did not lose the Vietnam War, Mr. Whitefield. We won! We kicked the enemy’s ass to the bamboo-constructed curb, just like our children and grandchildren are doing now in the Global War on Terrorism, but there is one big difference: The American kids in harm’s way today need not worry, because Vietnam veterans like me will not allow liberal media elitists like you do to them what you all did to us back then. Sure, you will not print my letter, as your rag has proven it cares not one whit about balance, but this email will go all over the internet, all over the world, and people will applaud the fact that you have been taken to the woodshed, which we will do everytime you try to disrespect our military. Some men in suits played word games for political expedience in regards to the outcome of the Vietnam War, but make no mistake, we won, and I am very proud to be a Vietnam veteran, and if you can shut me up, there are 10 more Vietnam vets who will stand in my place. Guys like you try to make the anti-war machine build up steam, but each time you do, we will poke holes in the boiler. I put my life on the line for what I believed in: What about you?

Blessings,

Don Bendell

Bendell Enterprises PO Box ***
Canon City, Colorado 81215-0276 (719) 269-****

Isaiah 6:8

Please visit: www.donbendell.com and www.bendellkarate.com

Buy Don's new novel now, a modern day military thriller, BROKEN BORDERS, the exciting sequel to CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DETACHMENT, released worldwide by Berkley(Penguin) and available everywhere.

"Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam."

link hypertexed/kate
Back to top
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am as disgusted by the op-ed itself as I am elated with Mr. Bendell's reply. The contempt in which I hold Whitehead and his Kerry-loving, military-loathing peers knows no bounds...and for that, alone, it is worth reprinting here as testament to their loathsomeness...

Quote:
Opinion : Op-Ed
MODEST PROPOSAL
Apocalypse again -- call up the Vietnam vets
Where else can Bush get 21,500 trained soldiers for his 'surge'?
By Paul Whitefield, PAUL WHITEFIELD supervises the editorial pages' copy desk. January 21, 2007

LISTENING TO President Bush's speech on Iraq earlier this month, my first thought was: "Where the heck are we going to get 21,500 more soldiers to send to Iraq?" Our Reserves are depleted, our National Guard is worn out, our Army and Marine Corps are stretched to the limit.

Then it hit me: Re-up our Vietnam War veterans and send them.

They're trained. They're battle-hardened. Many already have post-traumatic stress disorder. Also, some have their own vehicles — Harleys mostly, which are cheap to run, make small targets and are highly mobile. I'll even bet that lots of these guys still have guns (you know, just in case).

OK, some vets are a bit long in the tooth (or don't have teeth — because of Agent Orange?). Or their eyesight isn't what it was. Or their reflexes have slowed. But with today's modern weaponry, how well do you have to see?

Too out of shape, you say? Listen, if Rocky Balboa can step back into the ring at age 60, all these Vietnam War vets need is a little boot-camp magic and they'll be good to go. I mean, who doesn't want to drop a few pounds?

Don't want geezers fighting for us? Well, let's face it, our young people have greater value right here. Most of us want to retire and collect our hard-earned Social Security, and we need those youngsters here, working and paying taxes — lots of taxes.

Finally, these Vietnam War guys are hungry for revenge. After all, they fought in the only war the U.S. ever lost. And they didn't even get a parade. So this is their chance. We can throw them that big parade when they come marching home.

LA Times


Leftists and Defeatists - Freedom's Parasites
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AMOS
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 558
Location: IOWA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, Miss Whitefield, I still have guns. Lotsofem. Remember that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most telling is that Whitehead 'declined' the opportunity to 'discuss' his op-ed on the Hugh Hewitt Program.

Paul Whitefield's Essay in The Los Angeles Times
_________________
Clark County Conservative
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fortdixlover
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 1476

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
I am as disgusted by the op-ed itself as I am elated with Mr. Bendell's reply. The contempt in which I hold Whitehead and his Kerry-loving, military-loathing peers knows no bounds...and for that, alone, it is worth reprinting here as testament to their loathsomeness...


Guys and gals,

The writer of this LA Times Op-Ed is truly mentally ill. It's quite sick.

-- FDL
_________________
"Millions For Defense, Not One Cent For Tribute" - Thomas Jefferson on paying ransom to Muslim corsairs (pirates).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dusty
Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 1264
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are a group of people in this country who should not be allowed to breed. People whose gene should not be admitted into the pool of future human beings. Paul Whitefield is one member of that group.

Dusty
_________________
Left and Wrong are the opposite of Right!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AMOS
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 558
Location: IOWA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep, their gene pool needs some more chlorine. Note, gene 'pool', as in one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stevie
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 1451
Location: Queen Creek, Arizona

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well it sure as shoot won't be 'ol Whitehead fighting for our freedom...or his.

what a chicken liver! so easy to hide behind a desk and shoot words out isn't it? he's probably too chicken liver to go as an embedded ! lol!

honestly, I'm to the point that these people should not be those our brave troops are fighting for! Their addresses should be given to all terrorists ...
the terrorists can be sure these weaklings won't seek 'justice' if they or
their families are bombed...right?
(no, they'll run sniveling to the law, military, press etc...)
_________________
Stevie
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should
be arrested, exiled or hanged.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sixdogteam
Seaman


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 183
Location: Upper Wabash River Valley

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A new low is right, for sure!
_________________
HHC 212th CAB MMAF RVN '70-'71
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bob51
Seaman


Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Belfast

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul.Whitefield@latimes.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bob51
Seaman


Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Belfast

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2007/01/an_unpopular_pr.html#more

Too clever by half? I had no idea the good citizens of Los Angeles were such sophisticates in deployment of the style of an Irish satiricist.

Quote:
In 1729, he published A Modest Proposal, a satire in which the narrator, with intentionally grotesque logic, recommends feeding the rich using impoverished infants: ”I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food...” Following the satirical form, he introduces the reforms he is actually suggesting by deriding them:


Perhaps Mr Whitefield just missed the point of Swift's satire?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group