 |
SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Me#1You#10
Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:26 pm Post subject: Peretz: "The Democrats, Hoping for Defeat" |
 |
|
Marty Peretz, The New Republic Editor-in-Chief with a followup commentary on the shifting journalistic landscape and the millstone of "defeatists" being placed around democratic leadership's collective necks. But both Mr. Peretz and TNR have gone so far down the ladder of journalistic credibility (spell that BEAUCHAMP) that, perhaps, this might be considered an exercise in rehabilitation. Anyway...FWIW...
| Quote: | The Democrats, Hoping for Defeat
by Marty Peretz
"The Spine", TNR
26.11.2007
Is the war won? Probably not. Is it going much better for Iraq and for us? Certainly. This was certified by the big three-column headline in last Tuesday's New York Times. And even big-time opponents of what they had come to think of as the president's own demented enterprise are beginning to admit it. The news is very difficult for those folk because many of them had drawn outlandish conclusions about the future of American power in the Middle East. Actually, about its passing.
The New Yorker was, as`recently as September, already "Planning for Defeat," telling its readers how we should "withdraw from Iraq." Would it, unplanned and reckless, be a "Saigon moment," as other seers predicted?
The front page of this Sunday's Times carries a headline, "As Democrats See Security Gains in Iraq, Tone Shifts." It parses the predicaments of the party's various presidential candidates, and this parsing puts Hillary Clinton in the most advantageous position largely because she had put herself in opposition to the war without committing herself to a scheduled troop withdrawal. This is an opportunity for more fudging on her part but the kind of fudging that would reassure hard-liners, if they could be reassured by Hillary at all.
The more favorable the situation in Iraq the more difficult it becomes for the other aspirants for the nomination. As anyone who watches the candidates will know they are now switching, quite desperately, to a domestic agenda. The problem with this tactic is that their strategies -- and the strategy of the party itself -- had been built on the utter disaster that was imagined to be unfolding in Iraq. After all, the House has just passed a bill to withdraw American troops by exactly a year from now.
Forgive another reference to Vietnam. I believe that, in 1972, when George McGovern had been anointed the Democratic candidate, the nominee and many of his devotees actually wanted a North Vietnamese victory over the South and its U.S. allies. The American electorate had an intuition that this was the case, and it repelled them. Hence sanctimonious George winning in only one state.
There is no exact parallel to this for 2008. But I suspect that many Democrats are so deeply hostile to a forward foreign policy and their minds so deeply embedded in the notion that you can negotiate successfully with fanatics and tyrants that they wouldn't mind a prophylactic victory for the enemy. Which raises the question: is this enemy their enemy? I suspect not.
And so here is the timeless wisdom of the Speaker of the House: "The fact is, we can no longer sustain the military deployment in Iraq."
The New Republic |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GenrXr
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 1720
Location: Houston
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Was there a time when TNR was taken seriously? I have only known of this outfit for a few years and during that time it has been a mess of poor reporting and ideological rhetoric of the worst kind.
_________________
"An activist is the person who cleans up the water, not the one claiming its dirty."
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to stand by and do nothing." Edmund Burke (1729-1797), Founder of Conservative Philosophy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10
Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GenrXr wrote: | | Was there a time when TNR was taken seriously? I have only known of this outfit for a few years and during that time it has been a mess of poor reporting and ideological rhetoric of the worst kind. |
Certainly arguable on both counts, though I can't claim personal familiarity as I'm an infrequent TNR consumer. Nonetheless I'm tickled to read this type of commentary on their editorial pages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
