SwiftVets.com

[Guest]

According to SmearVets, publicly criticizing US soldiers for war crimes is proof you're unfit to serve, right? So when will you guys be launching your smear campaign against Rumsfeld?


Oh wait... he's a Republican.

[sparky]

That's a good point. There is a major difference, however:

Pictures.

Rumsfeld couldn't follow his conservative inclination to deny the torture because of the pictures. Before the pictures, he sure denied it.

Kerry is to be blamed for not maintaining the "code of silence" that people in uniform expect from others who know of their crimes.

[carpro]

[Guest]

[carpro]

Is that a yes?
_________________
"If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service."

[Guest]

[carpro]

If thats true, I'd consider a name change. It gives the wrong impression.
_________________
"If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service."

[Greenhat]

LMAO

Smear Vietnam Vets? Who?

Only two Vietnam era veterans are being discussed here. John F. Kerry and George W. Bush. And only John F. Kerry spent any time in Vietnam.

And JF Kerry has smeared himself, over and over, with his own words, his own actions. What else do you call meeting with Madame Binh? What else do you call going on TV and claiming to have committed atrocities? What else do you call lying to the US Congress? What else do you call taking part in a meeting that discusses the assassination of US Senators and not reporting it? What else do you call turning his back on US POWs?

The only smearing to be done has been done, by Senator Kerry. To himself.
_________________
De Oppresso Liber

[carpro]