SwiftVets.com

[hanna]

"There were a lot of people protesting that war, some of whom he would agree with and some of whom he would disagree with," said Mr. Hurley, who marched with Mr. Kerry in Washington in 1971. "I don't think he had any control of that. It was the issue that was dominating. Like a lot of other vets coming back, we were angry and frustrated [that] guys were dying in Vietnam for no reason."

http://www.vietnamveteransagainstkerry.com/

[cjg]

Sorry, Mr. Hurley, your excuses do not wash. Frustrated and so noble
people like yourself, Kerry and Fonda did not have to smear your troops
in Vietnam.

Nope, it does not compute in my head. Think about it.

Worried about troops in Vietnam, so go out and tell the world they
are savages, murderers, rapists etc and that will help the situation?

The usual, liberals think we can not figure out the truth, well, we can and
there is no way anyone is going to tell me the actions of the above
helped bring the men home.

Home to what, anyway? To being called names, to be spat on, to
have to work at clearing their reputation?

No acceptance here of your excuses now.
_________________
Swiftvets rock!

[hanna]

The point about this is his obvious bias. There he is out there defending Kerry's hero status. What a JOKE.

[one more captins mast]

History does not care who has the microphone, who talks the loudest,

who has the most post, ect.

History has come to visit, and it to his "Sir, Hisses", the Press

fan club, and he himself, must think that they have be in a dream

and there is a huge Demon on a huge white horse, and the demons

eyes are "SEARING, SEARING INTO THEM , with red hot eyes

that do not seem to look away, the eyes are on them and them only.

Is it 'FEAR, THEY FEEL, FEAR the dark side looms , they have one

last chance.
_________________
the strange mr aj