|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LewWaters Admin
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 4042 Location: Washington State
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 8:28 pm Post subject: Spin on Kerry's 1971 Testimony |
|
|
Lately, I've heard commentators stating that Kerry's testimony before the Fulbright commission in 1971 wasn't him accusing veterans of any war crimes, it was his relating what "other decorated Vietnam vets" had to say.
However, they fail to mention that Congress had an investigation by Naval Investigative Service. Of that investigation, B.G. Burkett, in his book, Stolen Valor wrote;
" Quote: | The results of this investigation, carried out by the Naval Investigative Service are interesting and revealing," said historian Guenter Lewy in his book America in Vietnam. His history of the war was one of the first to rely on previously classified documents in the National Archives. "Many of the veterans, although assured that they would not be questioned about atrocities they might have committed personally, refused to be interviewed. One of the active members of the VVAW told investigators that the leadership had directed the entire membership not to cooperate with military authorities." |
If Kerry was merely repeating what he was told by others, why didn't he either report these allegations, since he was still a Naval Reserve Officer (inactive, I believe) or verify what was said?
They also say he was just a young man. He was 27 at the time, I was 20 when I served in Vietnam and I was one of the older junior enlisted men in my unit. 27 isn't that young and a 27 year old veteran should be able to easily distinguish between truth and fiction, especially since he claims to have been there.
Of those "decorated Vietnam veterans," many were proven to have never served in Vietnam, some never even in the military. That's who he relied upon to relay testimony.
Don't let them spin this, hit them with the truth when they do. _________________ Clark County Conservative |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ccr Commander
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 325
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great post, Lew.
I would really love to see this site have a talking points section -- just like what they have @ johnkerry.com, du, moveon. _________________ Whose side is John Kerry really on? Take this quiz and decide for yourself.
http://www.learnthat.com/quiz/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
arjr111 Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jun 2004 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Lately, I've heard commentators stating that Kerry's testimony before the Fulbright commission in 1971 wasn't him accusing veterans of any war crimes, it was his relating what "other decorated Vietnam vets" had to say. |
They must figure everyone is an idiot. This excuse completely ignores the fact, that Kerry admitted personally to committing War Crimes! _________________ Semper-Fi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chuck54 PO1
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 466
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought that Kerry admitted to committing the alleged war crimes himself.
The "I was young" excuse is crap. If that was the case he would have soundly renounced what he had done and apologized. If he had done that, most reasoanble people would forgive. But he has not, as General Brady has pointed out. _________________ "And no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often, than the two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry"
Zell Miller |
|
Back to top |
|
|
integritycounts Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 667
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
“That was part of the Torture, was to sign a statement you had committed war crimes.” |
|
Back to top |
|
|
7rrfs Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kerry's 'testimony before Congress.
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/pacepa200402260828.asp
February 26, 2004, 8:28 a.m.
Kerry’s Soviet Rhetoric
The Vietnam-era antiwar movement got its spin from the Kremlin.
By Ion Mihai Pacepa
Part of Senator John Kerry's appeal to a certain segment of Americans is his Vietnam-veteran status coupled with his antiwar activism during that period. On April 12, 1971, Kerry told the U.S. Congress that American soldiers claimed to him that they had, "raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned on the power, cut off limbs, blew up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan."
The exact sources of that assertion should be tracked down. Kerry also ought to be asked who, exactly, told him any such thing, and what it was, exactly, that they said they did in Vietnam. Statutes of limitation now protect these individuals from prosecution for any such admissions. Or did Senator Kerry merely hear allegations of that sort as hearsay bandied about by members of antiwar groups (much of which has since been discredited)? To me, this assertion sounds exactly like the disinformation line that the Soviets were sowing worldwide throughout the Vietnam era. KGB priority number one at that time was to damage American power, judgment, and credibility. One of its favorite tools was the fabrication of such evidence as photographs and "news reports" about invented American war atrocities. These tales were purveyed in KGB-operated magazines that would then flack them to reputable news organizations. Often enough, they would be picked up. News organizations are notoriously sloppy about verifying their sources. All in all, it was amazingly easy for Soviet-bloc spy organizations to fake many such reports and spread them around the free world.
As a spy chief and a general in the former Soviet satellite of Romania, I produced the very same vitriol Kerry repeated to the U.S. Congress almost word for word and planted it in leftist movements throughout Europe. KGB chairman Yuri Andropov managed our anti-Vietnam War operation. He often bragged about having damaged the U.S. foreign-policy consensus, poisoned domestic debate in the U.S., and built a credibility gap between America and European public opinion through our disinformation operations. Vietnam was, he once told me, "our most significant success."
NOT exactly what he heard from 150 Vets at Winter Soldier, eh? _________________ "I served admirably in Vietnam" John Kerry
"Yes, I committed atrocities in Vietnam" John Kerry |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stealthy Lieutenant
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 237
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How can he say after he served he was stupid and young and when he was younger a hero of monumental proportion?
Pahleze. _________________ American Conservative |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LewWaters Admin
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 4042 Location: Washington State
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
lrb111 Captain
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Posts: 508
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, he was old enough to ask the navy for an early out, so he could run for office.
So, on one hand he was old enough and mature enough to hold public office, but was immature when he went before congress.
These events also beg us to overlook the fact that he became active in anti-war activities AFTER he lost this first election.
It begs us to assume that he came back "disillusioned and immediately started up with the VVAW, Panthers, and Communist Party." Which is not the way it happened.
He joined those groups after he figured out they were a means to an end, and a way to gain publicity.
Although, he held communist ideals before the Navy, after joining the VVAW, and remains the most far left in the senate today. _________________ said Democratic Chairman Terry McAuliffe. "It is inexcusable to mock service and sacrifice."
well, when even the DNC can see it,,,,, then kerry is toast. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
You Bic? Ensign
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Posts: 55 Location: North Florida
|
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While a lot of attention has rightly been put on his descriptions of attrocities, Kerry in later testimony before the Senate committee said that the USA(armed forces) MURDERED 200,000 Vietnamese every year.
Note he did not say "killed" He said MURDERED.
He slimed millions of Veterans who were trying their best in a difficult situation by calling them mass murderers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
You Bic? Ensign
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Posts: 55 Location: North Florida
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
The excuse that Kerry was just repeating others testimony is no excuse at all.
He was the spokesman for those making these slanders. Just as every group or politican usually has a spokes(person) when they talk to the press, Kerry slimed millions of Vietnam Vets before the cameras in this role, accusing them of mass attrocities.
He did so in times of war, with troops still fighting and dying in the field and with American Prisoners of War in Hanoi.
He did it when the war was winding down, when the protest was redundant to ending the war. He stabbed us in the back and then twisted the knife. .
He should be forever known as Hanoi John. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goswiftsgo Seaman Recruit
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:54 am Post subject: Actually it is very important. Proceed carefully ! |
|
|
The official testimony is as follows. Note this is a link to the winter soldier.
http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/index.php?topic=Testimony
I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say that several months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.
It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit, the emotions in the room, the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam, but they did. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do.
They told the stories at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beldar Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 77
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BC PO3
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 288 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2004 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
The spin that is coming from John Kerry about his 1971 testimony, is bogus and full of B***S***, and only goes to strengthen my resolve to see this man not only defeated this November but to show how much of a liar and coward he really is.
The spin that he was only reporting what was told to him is an out right lie and a desperate spin on his testimony.
“I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say that several months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.”
Those are Kerry’s own words from his testimony. He says WE HAD an investigation, those words show me that he is the one who, along with others, took the initiative to seek out and find testimony about crimes committed by the military. He not only took it upon himself to find this information but to say it, under oath before congress. I can only come to two conclusion from this, that Kerry either knew that his testimony was an outright lie, or that he truly believed in what he was testifying to.
From his investigation he took the testimony from what he says was 150 honorably discharged veterans. He, as the investigator, uses these testimonies to show the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, that not only was the committed on a day-to-day basis but was done with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command
“We who have come here to Washington have come here because we feel we have to be winter soldiers now. We could come back to this country; we could be quiet; we could hold our silence; we could not tell what went on in Vietnam, but we feel because of what threatens this country, the fact that the crimes threaten it, no reds, and not redcoats but the crimes which we are committing that threaten it, that we have to speak out.”
In this part of his statement he uses the word WE ten times nowhere does he say they, as in…They who have come, or that they have to speak out. The use of the word WE so many times clearly shows that he, John Kerry is part of that group that he now tries to say he was only relaying what they said. All through his testimony he uses the word WE instead of they.
Let’s move on…………….
“The war will continue. So what I am saying is that yes, there will be some recrimination but far, far less than the 200,000 a year who are murdered by the United States of America”
Spin that you S.O.B. _________________ Remember United Flight 93, "Are you guys ready? Let's roll."
Duty Honor Country |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goswiftsgo Seaman Recruit
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2004 2:03 am Post subject: well said BC !!! |
|
|
WE WE WE, just like John French Kerry likes it ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|