|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
HOV1 Lt.Jg.
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 100 Location: North East Georgia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:52 am Post subject: Op Ed piece by Major General Patrick Brady (MOH) |
|
|
Thought you folks would find this educational... sorry to have my first post be so long. HOV1
We seldom hear directly from Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady Medal Of Honor (MOH) recipient. Below is the guest op-ed he submitted to a veteran's newsletter in Missouri.
Northwest Veterans Newsletter - Local News
America has no kings or queens but we do have nobility - our nobility is called Veterans. That nobility is responsible for the bounty that is America but tragically their influence has faded in recent years and the values they died for are under attack. But this election year they are back in demand and some have said the veteran vote could decide this election. It may have put Bush in the White House. With this in mind, John Kerry is seldom seen with out his band of brothers and constantly plays the "hero" card as a cornerstone of his bid for president, indeed, as the definition of who he is. Kerry defines patriotism as "keeping faith with those who wear the uniform of this country." He also brags that he "defended this country as a young man". If Missouri is the show me state, Veterans are the show me voters - we are not much for words, deeds are our stock in trade. Lets look at Kerry's deeds.
Before Kerry played his "hero" card, he played the atrocity card. When Kerry came back from Vietnam he joined with Jane Fonda and in 1971 denounced "those who wear the uniform" as terrorists-like rapists and assassins who "cut off heads, taped wires ... to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, shot at civilians, razed villages, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks" ... and said he "committed the same kinds of atrocities as thousands of others". He made these charges under oath. Kerry says today that he would have framed some of what he said in 1971 differently. But he does not say he lied, which he did, nor does he apologize. How can one properly frame the denunciations of ones comrades in arms as modern day Genghis Khans?
The very day that Kerry was calling Vietnam veterans' war criminals the family of one of those "war criminals", Michael Blanchfield, was posthumously receiving the Medal of Honor for Michael who had thrown himself on a grenade to save the lives of his comrades. How different from Kerry was the way this man kept faith with those who wore the uniform with him. How different from Kerry was the manner Michael defended his country.
He could have attacked the war without attacking the warrior. He could have questioned policy without supporting the communists' claim that our soldiers were war criminals. He could have kept faith with those who wore the uniform with him. But he did not and he should be held accountable.
By every measure, the Vietnam veteran has been an exceptional citizen; but there is one disturbing statistic -- their suicide rate. In the first 5 years after discharge the rate was 1.7 times higher than non-veterans. After 5 years it was less. This may have been due to the treatment the Vietnam veteran received from the media - and the anti war movement led by Kerry -- in the early years after the war. Living with the scars of war is difficult, for some unbearable, but all veterans suffer. The Vietnam veteran suffered physically as much, perhaps more than any veteran of the past century, but no veteran has suffered the mental agony of that veteran.
What Kerry/Fonda and the media elite did to the Vietnam veteran and his family is deplorable. They opened a gash in his psyche and then rubbed salt in it. Not just the living but also those who died and their families who questioned if a loved one is a war criminal. And the POWs some who believed the Kerry/Fonda cartel extended the war, increased their torture and filled more body bags. Whether Kerry and Fonda have blood on their hands is debatable but there is no doubt they have salt on them.
Kerry's "hero" card is based on medals he received in Vietnam and is much celebrated, and unchallenged, by the mainstream media. I know many Medal of Honor recipients who have received less publicity for their medal than Kerry has for his. But medals don't make a hero. It is how one uses medals that make a hero. Every honest soldier knows that medals are a function of circumstance, even happenstance, but most of all the support of ones fellow warriors.
I was awarded the Medal of Honor; but my fellow soldiers who supported me in the actions and took the time to write it up earned it. I wear it for them, they own my medals. And every Medal of Honor recipient and hero I know believes as I do. Medals should be a sign of patriotism, a symbol of sacrifice, support and defense of a great nation. The highest form of patriotism is service to our youth; heroes also wear their medal for them to signal the importance of courage. Heroes do not use their medals for personal political gain. As I said they are not theirs to use.
Senator Kerry threw his medals away (or ribbons, they are symbolically the same), a political act very difficult for any veteran to understand. He must have been proud of them for he wore them even on his fatigues, in violation of all regulations. But they were not his. They belonged to those who he served. By that act he symbolically denounced his fellow veterans -- again. Does one keep faith with those who wear the uniform by throwing away their medals?
But perhaps most telling of his leadership qualities is his use of his Purple hearts to abandon his band of brothers, his command, on a technicality. Kerry may be the only person in history who took advantage of a Navy regulation that allowed him to leave his command after 4 months for 3 purple hearts none of which ever caused him to miss a day of duty. In my experience men fought to stay with their band of brothers, especially commanders. All the commanders I know would get out of a hospital bed to be with their men. Some one had to take his place; someone probably less experienced who would have to learn the ropes. That put his command more at risk than if he stayed. It is not hard to understand why those who stayed in combat for the full year are upset with Kerry.
And veterans today would be upset with Kerry's support of Flag Burning his non-support of weapons systems and his 12 votes against military pay raises. But his use of veterans and misuse of his medals should bring into serious question his loyalty, integrity and character all of which equal leadership. He is not fit for command
Here is General Brady's MOH citation taken from the MOH website
BRADY, PATRICK HENRY
Rank and organization: Major, U.S. Army, Medical Service Corps, 54th Medical Detachment, 67th Medical Group, 44th Medical Brigade. Place and date: Near Chu Lai, Republic of Vietnam, 6 January 1968. Entered service at: Seattle, Wash. Born: 1 October 1936, Philip, S. Dak. Citation: For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity in action at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty, Maj. Brady distinguished himself while serving in the Republic of Vietnam commanding a UH-1H ambulance helicopter, volunteered to rescue wounded men from a site in enemy held territory which was reported to be heavily defended and to be blanketed by fog. To reach the site he descended through heavy fog and smoke and hovered slowly along a valley trail, turning his ship sideward to blow away the fog with the backwash from his rotor blades. Despite the unchallenged, close-range enemy fire, he found the dangerously small site, where he successfully landed and evacuated 2 badly wounded South Vietnamese soldiers. He was then called to another area completely covered by dense fog where American casualties lay only 50 meters from the enemy. Two aircraft had previously been shot down and others had made unsuccessful attempts to reach this site earlier in the day. With unmatched skill and extraordinary courage, Maj. Brady made 4 flights to this embattled landing zone and successfully rescued all the wounded. On his third mission of the day Maj. Brady once again landed at a site surrounded by the enemy. The friendly ground force, pinned down by enemy fire, had been unable to reach and secure the landing zone. Although his aircraft had been badly damaged and his controls partially shot away during his initial entry into this area, he returned minutes later and rescued the remaining injured. Shortly thereafter, obtaining a replacement aircraft, Maj. Brady was requested to land in an enemy minefield where a platoon of American soldiers was trapped. A mine detonated near his helicopter, wounding 2 crewmembers and damaging his ship. In spite of this, he managed to fly 6 severely injured patients to medical aid. Throughout that day Maj. Brady utilized 3 helicopters to evacuate a total of 51 seriously wounded men, many of whom would have perished without prompt medical treatment. Maj. Brady's bravery was in the highest traditions of the military service and reflects great credit upon himself and the U.S. Army. _________________ USN 78-84 STS1(SS) USS George C. Marshall SSBN 654(G)
HOV1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Truegrit Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 246 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can Major General Brady's superb op-ed piece be photocopied and handed out? The reason I ask: I am committing to spending one day this week in various venues around Boston, including the Boston Commons and Beacon Hill with my plaqard, which will read along the lines of: "Kerry's Baseless "War Crime" Accusations Against His Fellow Vets Disqualifies him to be Commander in Chief" -- and I intend to carry along hand outs to give out to those who approach me, or want more details.
Ted Harwood
Harwood_T@msn.com
U.S. Army Enlisted ('57-'60) _________________ Ted Harwood, Ph.D.
Enlisted, U.S. Army ('57-'60)
Last edited by Truegrit on Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Truegrit Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 246 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minor correction to what I just posted. I meant to say that I would be committing to spend one day each week through the Fall to carry my plaqard and hand-outs. _________________ Ted Harwood, Ph.D.
Enlisted, U.S. Army ('57-'60) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HOV1 Lt.Jg.
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 100 Location: North East Georgia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just checked the web site where it was originally posted and did not see a copyright. The only way to be sure is to contact the webmaster of the site http://members.aol.com/bear317/nwvets.htm Her name is Pam Young and her e-mail is listed as lilsispam@aol.com . Good Luck Brother.
HOV1 _________________ USN 78-84 STS1(SS) USS George C. Marshall SSBN 654(G)
HOV1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Truegrit Lieutenant
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 246 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Boomer Sailor for Pam Young's email. I will contact her to make sure I can reproduct General Brady's statement.
I will holding my plaqard aloft on the Boston Commons, in Louisberg Square, on Beacon Hill, where the Kerry-Heinz family has a residence, and also in front of the Kennedy school for public administration, which houses a lot of smart people who want to whitewash Kerry's anti-war record.
And I will pass out the General's excellent commentary.
Keep the fight. The radical Left threw pigs blood and God knows what else at those who returned from Vietnam, and hurled cruel and devasting, and untrue epithets -- supplied in part by Kerry, who betrayed the big band of brothers over there. _________________ Ted Harwood, Ph.D.
Enlisted, U.S. Army ('57-'60) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|