SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

John O on Hannity now
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jungle_rat
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 106
Location: Geyserville, CA

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
But hey, what's this new attack that O'Neil was in Cambodia? My thinking is who the heck cares?


It speaks to O'Neill's credibility. However, O'Neill hasn't based his entire career on such a statement.

We all exaggerate and embellish, but there's a massive difference between casual embellishment and being a pathological liar and slanderer under oath, or as an elected official....a difference which is completely lost on the "more nuanced and sophisticated " libs.
_________________
"Medals do not make a man. Morals do."-Don Bendell


Last edited by Jungle_rat on Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:43 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve Z
Rear Admiral


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 687
Location: West Hartford CT

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:43 am    Post subject: Hannity & Colmes Reply with quote

Michael Dobbs on Hannity & Colmes stated that he didn't know whether John Kerry wrote the after-action report for the 3/13/69 incident, to determine whether Kerry or the other Swiftvets (especially Thurlow) are telling the truth.

NavyChief posted on this website an excellent, detailed analysis which showed (according to numbers appearing on the after-action report) that Kerry wrote the report, but nobody can expect a non-Navy journalist to decipher this from the numbers which appear on the report.

Is it possible for Navy Chief to officially declare before a friendly forum (Hannity, Rush, Brit Hume, etc.) that he can prove that Kerry wrote the report, which is why "Navy records" agree with Kerry's version of things?
_________________
The traitor will crater!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fortdixlover
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 1476

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mtpNY wrote:
I love it when Kerry compared himself to Martin Sheen in "Apocalypse Now".
He actually made the specific comparison in regard to his excursions into Cambodia.
Sneaking his way into Cambodia on super secret, dangerous, stealth missions to save the world.
I wish this aspect would be reported a little more.
This was part of his self-created hype that was seared into his memory


Maybe they were seared into his memory via the machine from "Total Recall"? Twisted Evil


Cambodia....CAMBODIA...CAAAAMBOOOOODDDDIIIIAAAA !!!!!!

FDL


Last edited by fortdixlover on Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:59 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Polaris
Rear Admiral


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 626

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve Z,

I don't want to speak for navychief, but it is my understanding that he is still on active duty. If so, he can not take place in such a forum legally (it would be taking political sides while in uniform). I am not a lawyer so I don't know all the details, but the service is very strict about that.
_________________
-Polaris

Truth is Beauty
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ogre
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 120

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mtpNY wrote:
His fantasizing and embellishing his involvement ala Al Gore


Well, Gore was in Nam longer, even though never in combat... even though he ran that picture of himself looking down the barrel of his M-16. Laughing

Quote:
Gore was assigned a position as reporter covering the activities of the 20th Engineer Brigade in Bien Hoa, South Vietnam. Obviously, this was a non-combat position, and some of those who served with Gore reported that their superiors requested Gore "should cover only military operations where security was good." However, they also reported that Gore had not asked for any such arrangement, nor was he aware of it.
During his 1988 presidential campaign, Gore issued brochures containing a photo of himself with an M-16 rifle, which created the false impression that he had served as an infantryman, even though his only real combat experience was interviewing other GIs who really had been in combat.
Gore filled his position with the 20th Engineers for five months. Army regulations at the time allowed for early discharge of personnel who wanted to teach or attend school if their services were considered "not essential to the mission." As a reporter, Gore was certainly not "essential" to the war effort, and he applied for such a discharge.


http://www.snopes.com/military/goreviet.htm
_________________
"All right, they're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time."
"We're Surrounded...That Simplifies Our Problems" _ Chesty Puller
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michmaddave
Ensign


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man, is he a pathological lier, making statements to inflate his immage of himself, or is he a pathological psychotic who has immagined himself playing rolls in media film?? Either is scary.
_________________
To model our political system upon speculations of lasting tranquility, is to calculate on the weaker springs of the human character.
---Alexander Hamilton
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ASPB
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1680

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jungle_rat wrote:
Quote:
But hey, what's this new attack that O'Neil was in Cambodia? My thinking is who the heck cares?


It speaks to O'Neill's credibility. However, O'Neill hasn't based his entire career on such a statement.

We all exaggerate and embellish, but there's a massive difference between casual embellishment and being a pathological liar and slanderer under oath, or as an elected official....a difference which is completely lost on the "more nuanced and sophisticated " libs.


Let me make something clear. Bernique's Creek, as it was called after a October '68 incident, is inland from Ha Tien and at certain points comes within 50 yards of the Cambodian border but never, I mean never, enters Cambodia.

Here's the Chart: http://www.rjsmith.com/IV-Corps-delta-01-west.html

Kerry may have made a couple of patrols on this Song although there are no records that he did. Later in '69 and '70 there was more action up there and O'Neill spent a lot of time there, including winning a BSM, I believe.
_________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Beatrice1000
Resource Specialist


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1179
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chuck54 wrote:
..Colmes was very sleazy quoting Oneils comments to Nixon and leaving out a critical sentence regarding Cambodia....


Alan really thought he had something there!...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the0point
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh I agree. O'Neil seems to be a top notch guy. Lot's of credibility in my book.

I think what bothered me was Colmes kept trying to take O'Neil's statments out of context. Actually the Kerry camp has probably been pouring over every word O'Neil and the other vets have ever uttered in their lifetimes to try to use something against them.

These guys just need to hang in there. The fire from the Kerry people is intense, but I think if we keep the pressure on the truth will win out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BB Stacker
Seaman


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 150
Location: Eustis Fl

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

O'neill is always impressive in his statements; clear, concise and excedingly well informed. The liberal talking heads are not going to get half-truths and misinformation by him if he has a chance to respond.

Their only chance to defeat him is to shout him down and keep him from speaking, like Mathews did. I look to see more of this tactic.

It shows how scared they are of the truth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve Z
Rear Admiral


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 687
Location: West Hartford CT

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:26 am    Post subject: Who wrote after-action report? Reply with quote

If NavyChief is legally prevented from participating in a political debate because he is still active, could some other Swift Boat veteran or former member of Kerry's chain of command (retired from the Navy) who understands those numbers go on TV and use NavyChief's arguments to prove that Kerry wrote the report?

In watching the debates on Hannity and Colmes between O'Neill and Kerry supporters, this seems to be a crucial question. Right now, "Navy records" seem to support Kerry. But if it can be shown that Kerry wrote them, then it becomes Kerry's word against everyone else (or, as Hannity pointed out, 4 men's word against 17 men's word), and Kerry's case becomes much weaker.

I'm not a Navy man, so someone else will have to deal with this!

Just a suggestion--I want you guys to win these debates!
_________________
The traitor will crater!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Integrity
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 92
Location: California

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My opinion of lawyers has gone up considerably after watching the performance of Mr O'Neill and reading the blogs of Hugh Hewitt, Glenn Reynolds and Scott, John & Paul @ Power Line.

It's obvious that Mr O'Neill has a firm grasp of the facts and a mind capable of using them whenever needed. He's composed, calm and clearly in charge. I hope he's a recurring nightmare for Senator Gigolo.

Laughing
_________________
"What our enemies have begun, we will finish,"
- President George W. Bush
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ruffcutt
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

John O'Neill did one thing on tonight's show that I've been waiting for, he outlined each and every change in Kerry's story since the SBVFT became known.

It's obvious that the media would rather label the SBVFT as a group who tells lies, and that doesn't surprise me since it doesn't appear that the already established victories are being announced. I strongly suggest that the SBVFT focus on each and every change in stories from the Cambodia fiasco to the recent admission that the first purple heart was the result of a self-inflicted wound. A timeline of the flip-flops should appear on the SBVFT site because we all know that every Tom, Dick, and Harry from the media to the government is lurking there.

These changes in Kerry's stories are what lend immediate legitimacy and credibility to the group. One cannot label the SBVFT a bunch of partisan liars when within two weeks, Kerry has had to concede on at least three inaccuracies regarding his claims of valor. As a matter of fact, I would suggest that the next commercial focus on what has already been established these past two weeks. I also think that instead of making new accusations towards Kerry, let members of the SBVFT simply tell of some of their own experiences in order to introduce themselves to the public in a fashion that displays them more as real people with real concerns about what a Kerry presidency may bring.

There are plenty of days left before the election to toss in a more mundane and personal presentation to the American people. The SBVFTs need to be properly introduced now that they have the attention of the entire country. If this doesn't happen, the media just may be successful in tarnishing their names enough so that the people who need to hear, won't hear because they will no longer wish to listen. The media will use that as justification to avoid the story all together.

This is just my opinion of course, but it does seem as though confusion is now above the facts. This is what Kerry wants...don't give it to him.

RC

P.S. Colmes looks like indisputable proof that aliens have been inbreeding with humans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rovercop
Ensign


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Location: Battle Ground, Washington

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, I don't get the Fox News Network - does anybody have any idea where I might read a transcript of the show??

Very Happy

Rovercop
_________________
USAF, Ret
AMC SATCOM (TALCE) / Ramstein
'Waterloo'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lrb111
Captain


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 508

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 5:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nomorelies wrote:
I don't see what Hannity sees in "Ichabod" Colmes. That guy is a stupid jerk. Razz


Around our house we call it "Hannity and Howdy". But we are old enough to remember "Howdy Doody".. Wink
_________________
said Democratic Chairman Terry McAuliffe. "It is inexcusable to mock service and sacrifice."
well, when even the DNC can see it,,,,, then kerry is toast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group