View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ccwebb Ensign
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 74 Location: super boondocks of Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:44 pm Post subject: Can't mention Kerry's name in 527 ads? |
|
|
I believe I am correct in stating that starting September 3rd all 527s can continue to advertise but they can not mention a candidates name.
There goes another part of free speech.
Anyway, is there any public info on what (and how) the swiftvets intend to run TV spots with that restriction in mind?
Charlie |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Navy_Navy_Navy Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's all very complicated, but it has something to do with who funds the ad through the 527's - different rules for individuals vs. corporations, etc.
This campaign finance reform is working REALLY WELL, hm? _________________ ~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thegunnerswife Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 96
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doesn't say anything about showing his picture does it??? _________________ IYAOYAS! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
forgivenjojo Former Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Where can we go to get the official rules concerning running ads after September 2 ? Can somebody do the research on that? I would like to put a copy of it on my hard drive. I have been checking into the prices of newspaper ads in my hometown and am considering running some.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RocketFett PO3
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 292
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, no biggie. Like was said above me, just show his pic, and say, "this is the truth about the democrat candidate for President, so on and so forth". I wonder when it will dawn on John McCain that he was used as a political whore by the democrats to get CFR passed. I am convinced that they had planned nearly four years ago that when they got it, they would immediately use it to funnell millions of dollars into groups like moveon.org and other radical liberal anti-Bush 527s, and let them have free reign under their deliberately placed loop hole allowing them to do what they do with no consequence and no oversight to see if what they say is actually true or not. Thank you mr. McCain for renting yourself out so cheap. Bravo. The democrats used you well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thegunnerswife Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 96
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Couldn't find any .... yet. Perhaps someone else will.
Saw this in an article on Foxnews.com
Quote: | Presumably, the organization will need to adjust its ads after Sept. 3, when MoveOn.org and other 527s are prohibited by campaign finance laws from mentioning candidates' names in their ads. |
_________________ IYAOYAS! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
taz Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 86 Location: new jersey
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure sbvft is well aware of the 527 laws and have planned everything out accordingly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Z Rear Admiral
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 687 Location: West Hartford CT
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:00 pm Post subject: New Ad |
|
|
So, if a SBVT ad after September 3 shows a radical anti-war mophead before the Senate, will younger viewers know that it was John Kerry? We might have some "splainin'" to do... _________________ The traitor will crater! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thegunnerswife Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 96
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It will all work out...... I agree with Taz! _________________ IYAOYAS! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mudderfudder77 Seaman Recruit
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are several restrictions, but if a 527 does not accept corporate donations (the Swifties does not) or if it is a regitered PAC (like Moveon.org) then it can continue to run ads without restrictions regardless of the Sept 2 date. Also a private citizen acting on his own behalf can run an ad regardless of restrictions placed on 527's, but has to be very careful about the content of that ad. Without the benfit of counsel it can be very dangerous to run an ad disparaging a candidate, you'd possibly open yourself up to a host of lawsuits, depending on the content of the ad. _________________ "The Swiftees have three things in abundance: money, brains, and balls. They know exactly how to go for the jugular, they have the dough to do it, and they are saving their best shot for last." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Kahuna Lieutenant
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 219 Location: SE Texas
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basically, if the 527 is a corporation they can't have ads that promote the defeat of someone running for Federal office.
If they are not a coprporation, they can't do that with Corporate or Union money.
Most 527s, like Moveon.org, are set up as a Corp and have another entity that is not. They track Corporate/Union money vs individual money differently. _________________ Top 10 Weasels.com is where Kerry is Weasel #1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hans Burkhardt Ensign
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 53 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On a quick search, this is the best I could find.
Restrictions on Electioneering Communications: The bill prohibits corporations, trade associations, and labor organizations from financing "electioneering communications" within 60 days of a general election and 30 days of a primary election using "treasury money." An electioneering communication is one that refers to a clearly identified federal candidate and is targeted to the candidate's state or district. (A corporation's, trade association's or union's PAC may still run or finance such ads because its funds are, by definition, hard money). This provision also would require non-corporate or non-union persons or entities that spend in excess of $10,000 on electioneering communications during a calendar year to file disclosure reports listing the person(s) making or controlling the disbursements and the custodian of the records, all contributors who gave more than $1,000 to finance the communications, and those to whom disbursements of more than $200 have been made.
Found at this website: http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/gs/cf/headlines/FinalApproval.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul Woll Lt.Jg.
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 134 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Then why not make a documentary movie after September 2nd. No laws against that is there? Unfit for Command, the movie, narrated by John Oneill with additional information from swiftvets.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snipe Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 574 Location: Peoria, Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just start refering to him as the "Boston Strangler" _________________ Tin Can Sailor |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mudderfudder77 Seaman Recruit
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SwiftVets don't have anything to worry about, they are exempt from the restrictions against 527 groups. They do not except money from Unions or corporations therefore they do not have to stop airing ads after Sept 2. _________________ "The Swiftees have three things in abundance: money, brains, and balls. They know exactly how to go for the jugular, they have the dough to do it, and they are saving their best shot for last." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|