SwiftVets.com

Belisaurius · Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:56 am Post subject:

Yeah, Pat is so far right he's damn near on the left on some things, BUT, he actually believes what he believes. He's a good advocate when he's not out on the fringe. Just don't ever mention "Neo-cons" when he's in the same room.
_________________
"I am Johnny Kerry and I approved this message before I didn't approve this message and after I decided it was just another smear"

Son Of The Godfather · Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:47 pm Post subject:

SOTG
_________________
"Which candidate would enemies of the United States prefer to see in the White House?"

Steve02C5 · Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:51 pm Post subject:

jataylor11 · Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:57 pm Post subject:

You have Matthews listed as liberal and others as ultra liberal.

I think you need to change Matthews description to "sreaming lunatic ultimate liberal"

Tilly · Seaman Apprentice Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 97

Chris Matthews is an old anti-war protester, with a brother that served in Vietnam.

About now, Matthews is probably experiencing what they call ... cognitive dissonance ... the state of confusion that exists when your beliefs are challenged by undeniable facts.

RMalloy · PO3 Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 280

Cognitive Dissonance - I love it.
Watching Matthews is like watching pure Demo strategist monkey house
antics, almost, but not, on par with Cleland's Trip to Crawford, which
by the way, got little if none coverage, and now Cleland has sunk from
sight, less than a couple of days later. It's been a major Demo movie
since day one of the Demo Convention, starring "Reporting for Duty"
Kerry arriving on the tugboat in Boston Harrrborrrr. I would have to
give them one star so far with this "Farce" they've been showing across
the Main Media Theater networks.

frankzzz · Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:37 pm Post subject:

One point Pat Buchanan made (and seems to have gone over everybody’s head) is that John O’Neill was on the boat AFTER Kerry left Vietnam and that we did indeed invade Cambodia AFTER Kerry left Vietnam. According to Pat, we sent thousands of troops into the country AFTER Kerry left Vietnam. I am not a history major but I do seem to recall that this is the way things happened and I also trust Pat’s recollection because he was part of the Nixon White House at the time.

So, when O’Neill told Nixon (in 1971) that he was in or near Cambodia, there is a real good chance that he was telling the truth and a real good chance that he had every reason to be in or near Cambodia.

On the other hand, Kerry’s lie was almost certainly told because he wanted to make the case that America was doing something illegal (it would have been illegal for him to be in Cambodia at that particular time) and that he, John Kerry, was a hero for condemning them for it.