SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kerry and M-79
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wing Wiper
Rear Admiral


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 7:32 am    Post subject: Kerry and M-79 Reply with quote

Kerry's first Purple Heart story has now been reduced to: he fragged himself with an M-79 HE grenade he fired short and was caught with a piece of wire from the fragmentation charge. I think that's a pretty well-established fact.
It's stated his M-16 jammed and he grabbed the M-79 from the bottom of the boat. That sounds pretty plausible, too. Now, here's where I need some help.
Had Kerry, as a Reserve Officer, ever fired an M-79 before that night? (It's stated it was hid first combat mission). Did he have ANY experience with that weapon? Or was he a butterbar that htought he knew how it worked and just started flinging rounds out into the dark, assuming it was a line-of-sight weapon like an M-16. Anybody that's fired the weapo knows what happens if you sight down the barrel, you get a short round. I saw a trainee try that and put one into the turf about 10 yards ahead of us. Luckily it didn't arm.
So, is there a way to see Kerry's small-arms training records that prove it wasn't his first experience with that weapon? If it was, it might go a long ways in explaining what happened, and making a case that he endangered himself and his own crewmen that night.
Anybody know if the M-79 was a standard weapon that a Reserve Navy officer would be trained on in 1971, prior to assignment to Swift boats?

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ALMOUNT
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Location: On the right side of Missourah

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had to carry a M-79 for a while and I hated it.

They could have easily had one on board for any reason.

God knows why you would want a little pop gun like that when you had TWIN 50's Shocked

I can't remember, (Hell, I can't remember what I had for supper)
but an HE projectile had to make ? number of revolutions after leaving the barrel before they would detonate..
_________________
101st Airborne Div.
Vietnam 67-68



http://www.DELTARAIDERS.COM

I killed a six pack....just to watch it DIE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
roughfun
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 105
Location: California

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot of M-79s I used had their rear sites removed and you used old fashioned "kentucky windage". With a claymore bag full of rounds you could have multible rounds in the air at the same time. If I remember right it was 15meters to arm the round so somtimes it had to be used like a morter when fighting was to close. You must be very good to do this but Ive seen it done. In our unit the squad leader carried it so very seldom where they in inexperienced hands. Semper Fi. P. S. Has any read "the Phantom Blooper"? Hard to find but any Marine From I Corps would love it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AMOS
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 558
Location: IOWA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:38 pm    Post subject: Ah, the old "Bloop Gun". Reply with quote

I seem to remember it was 12 revolutions before the round was armed. I wish I could remember why I remember that. It was supposed to be far enough so as not to injure the shooter. So, I don't know if I believe Old Dumbo Kerry on this one either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nakona
Lieutenant


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 242

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've used a Blooker and it's modern version, and M-203.

It's an easy enough and obvious enough weapon to operate that someone who didn't know what they were doing could easily pick one up and fire it, even if he'd never seen one before.

As has been pointed out, if a guy like that tried to sight it like a rifle, it wouldn't work the way he expected it too.
However, and this is just taking a W.A.G., I doubt that's what happened to Kerry.

I would figure he basically fired it one handed, trying to "sight by feel" and the motion of the boat caused an unexpected trajectory.

Frankly, I don't think, if that surmisal is correct, that Kerry should be blamed for being a dumb@ss, because ANYONE could make a mistake like that. However, if it'd been ME, I'd have just pulled that splinter out, splashed some alcohol or even just water on it, and stuck a bandaid on it. I for DAMNED sure would be to embarresses to put in for a P.H. for it.

I would, however, use it as an excuse to get the other guys to buy me a beer. Very Happy
_________________
13F20P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arty Guy
Seaman


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 190

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can easily believe that Kerry fired a short round or hit a tree branch or something too close. We had an aerial observer do exactly the same thing from an airplane at tree top height. Dumb.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AMOS
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 558
Location: IOWA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:38 pm    Post subject: Before/After Reply with quote

Dumbo Kerry coulda pulled that splinter out after HE stuck it in his arm. Another "before/after" deal for him.

We called 'em Bloop guns. There, I remembered sumpin else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LimaCharlie
PO2


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 386
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Being inexperienced, untrained, or just plain arrogant (stupid); he may have mistaken an HE round for a flare round and shot it up in the air. We would shoot up a flare round at night before using HE's for effect.

We went to general quarters (battle stations) one night for a light moving around on top of the hill behind us in a free fire zone. We were given the go ahead to fire on it. One of our junior officers pinched his finger trying to load his weapon. We never came close to hitting the light because it was Venus rising. The junior officer applied for a Purple Heart. I don't think he got it.

One of our Navy advisors was drunk one night returning from an Army club in Qui Nhon, Viet Nam and fell off the vehicle pulling another friend whose last name was Knapp off the vehicle landing on top of him. He was in the hospital with a ruptured spleen from the accident when it was visited by dignitaries. One of them asked him why he was in the hospital and he replied he was hit by a Knapp. While still in the hospital, he received a Purple Heart with the write-up of being hit with a Knapp. He had to refuse it and explain what a Knapp was to the officer.
_________________
I was going to become an anarchist, but they had too many rules.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul5388
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 36
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LC,

That advisor acount is part of the problem with Vietnam. There were a lot of people who didn't refuse a PH for the same quality injury. The end result is more than one John Kerry type individual walking around today. "Three Purple Hearts and he didn't bleed", quote from Senator Bob Dole.

I was looking through my 1st Med Cruise book (10 May 63 - 15 Dec 63) the other night and noticed there weren't any ribbons on anyone less than 1st Class PO's. Now people get ribbons for making it through boot camp! Rolling Eyes
_________________
"FLUSH THE JOHNS"
Bumper sticker seen at Shreveport VAMC

www.usslittlerock.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wing Wiper
Rear Admiral


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are some good answers here, but I was looking for information on whether or not Kerry ever received any training on the M-79. I had a small-arms training card (sorry, I can't remeber the DD form number) listing every weapon I was trained to use and the score I received on it (M-16, M-60, M-79, 12 Ga. shotgun, etc)
Kerry had one, too.
Did his list training on the M-79? A Swiftboat vet of the era would know if it was SOP to train on the M-79 before the first combat mission.
If Kerry was employing a weapon he was not trained to handle, we might go somewhere with this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sgt-Keeper
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 96

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:40 pm    Post subject: That does it! Reply with quote

Re: the M79.. I carried it, loved it, & was pretty good with it. But enough said about it. What I have been dying to ask the SVBs is this: Did you guys have training in using hand grenades and how did a "butter bars",
JFK get his hands on one in order to throw it into a rice basket? I mean, we were pretty good at tossing those things, but hardly used them unless we had to. Were hand grenades standard issue on a PCF? No wonder he had rice frags in his butt! And a pix (Xray) would answer his 3rd PH once & all. Wouldn't even have to take it out! Let's see what's in there. What kind of fragmentation piece is it?
BTW, I saw a PBR in the water on the Fox River. What a primative & spartan piece of equipment!! I still want to see a PCF up close. Keep the faith SBVs. You have our support too.
_________________
Fix the problem, not the blame.
USMC E5 Nam vet 65-66
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LimaCharlie
PO2


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 386
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was an enlisted man in the Navy from 1963 to 1976. They didn't document small-arms qualifications to my knowledge. I qualified on an M-1 in basic but the documentation just says I successfully completed basic training.

I don't know what training Kerry received in Swift Boat School. I went through Naval Advisor Training School that was the same for both enlisted and officers. We spent time at Camp Pendleton training on small-arms from the pistol through the .50 cal including grenades. It is funny how much further you can throw a live one compared to a practice one. We also ran around Camp Pendleton doing ambush/counter ambush training. We went through basic EOD and had to qualify with a shaped plastic explosive charge. We also went through SERE School and Vietnamese Language School. My documentation says successfully completed Naval Advisor Training, SERE School, and Vietnamese Language School.

Yes, there were grenades in the boats. We dropped a lot of concussion grenades over the side looking for swimmers around ships and waterfront bases.
_________________
I was going to become an anarchist, but they had too many rules.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul5388
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 36
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LC,

I don't remember anything being issued that stated weapons qualifications. I qualified with the M1 Garand in boot camp and after that we just shot off the fantail every couple of years. Neither of my DD 214's or NGB 22 has anything about weapons qualifications on them, even though I was authorized M-16 Sharpshooter and M1911A1 Expert.

The weapons possibly included on the Swift Boats is listed here. The listing (TO&E in the Army) includes the M-79 along with grenades.
Quote:
various crew member weapons, to include: M-60 machine guns, M-79 grenade launchers with (illumination, high explosive, flechette and 00 buckshot) rounds, M-14 and or M-16 rifles, 12 gauge Ithaca riot gun, .38 caliber or .45 caliber pistols, various types of hand grenades (fragmentation, concussion - M3A1, thermite and red, yellow and green smoke), very pistols (flare gun) and at times, some C-4 explosive.


I just looked in my 201 file and found weapons qualification on the DA Form 2-1. Obviously, the Navy doesn't use a DA form, so I'm not sure where it would be in Navy files.
_________________
"FLUSH THE JOHNS"
Bumper sticker seen at Shreveport VAMC

www.usslittlerock.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wing Wiper
Rear Admiral


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I just looked in my 201 file and found weapons qualification on the DA Form 2-1. Obviously, the Navy doesn't use a DA form, so I'm not sure where it would be in Navy files.


That's what I'm looking for, what form did the Navy use? I was in the Air Force and we had a permanent record of weapons training. I'm SURE the Navy had a form, if the geedunk Air Force did. Very Happy
I'm actually qualified on the M-60 and M-79, which is something for a zoomie. Heh..heh
This may not be worth persuing, with Adm. Schachte already blowing Kerry's story out of the water. I'm still betting that shot was Kerry's first with an M-79, or at minimum his first shot at night. It's pretty clear what happened.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul5388
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 36
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't have a copy of my Navy 201, so I don't know the answer to that one. Maybe I can find out.

Quote:
A U.S. Navy Enlisted (Field) Service Record (FSR) (NAVPERS 1070/600) is maintained for each current enlisted Sailor in the Navy or Naval Reserve. <SNIP>

NAVPERS 1070/604 — Enlisted Qualifications History (Rev. 7-91) Specialty codes, special skills (such as Marksman, Surface Warfare Quals, etc..)

Quote:
The U.S. Navy Officer (Field) Service Record (FSR) ( NAVPERS 1070/66) (Rev. 5-81), is maintained for each officer of the Navy or Naval Reserve, by the officer's current duty station. The record is available to assist the commanding officer in making daily personnel decisions. <SNIP>

The permanent personnel record contains documents (microfiched) which reflect on the character, performance, professional qualifications, and fitness of the officer. The permanent personnel record is maintained at the Bureau of Naval Personnel. Upon an officer's separation, the record is maintained for an additional 15 months (for a complete closing out) before transferring to the National Personnel Record Center located in St. Louis for archiving.

source

I guess the reason I don't have a Navy 201 is because it isn't a 201!

When I looked through the items listed in an Officer's FSR, I didn't see any mention of weapons qualifications.
_________________
"FLUSH THE JOHNS"
Bumper sticker seen at Shreveport VAMC

www.usslittlerock.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group