SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Dangerous Secret

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stealthy
Lieutenant


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 237

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:27 pm    Post subject: The Dangerous Secret Reply with quote

-S-

The Swift-boat controversy is not an ancient molehill turned into a mountain. It's how we're stumbling toward a debate that the Democrats don't want to have — but that everyone knows exists anyway. The real issue here is Kerry's views on war and foreign policy. Kerry is a McGovernite — a long-time member in good standing of his party's dovish wing. Kerry has hidden that fact, but now the truth is slipping out. When Kerry tried to transform his original radicalism into a hawkish parable, those who knew him better rebelled. The ensuing mess has forced the story of who John Kerry is, and always has been, into the public's focus. Whatever secrets his journals and military files may hold, the secret of John Kerry's actual views on war and foreign policy is the more dangerous one — for him, and for us.
http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz200408270856.asp
_________________
American Conservative
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jataylor11
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 856
Location: Woodbridge, Virginia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exactly. This is why the Kerry was journal will not see the light of day for some time. This is also why Kerry cannot be CIC during a time with thousands of radical Islamic extremists vow to kill 4 million Americans.

What part of they want to kill all of us do the radical left and peace freaks not understand.

During war with a enemy that isn't as clearly defined nor geographically contained as the communists of Southeast Asia, how can the Democratic Party possibly put forth Kerry as their candidate. Do they really think that the American people are so stupid as to only look at 4 months of combat service and ignore 420 months of anti-military, anti-defense (doveish) position.

I think it is time to emphasize the Kerry that showed up 100 times more often. Maybe only the liberal left and MSM echo chamber are stupid enough to ignore the math.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bach04
Lieutenant


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 212

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kerry and the rest of the democrats are living in the pre 9-11 period. To them, that terrible moment does not exist in their mind. The Russians are now saying that they found explosives in the wreckage of their planes that crashed. Can kerry be trusted to deal with the problems of terrorism? He has shown that he wants to negotiate with tyrants, and hope that they will be appeased. He will send surrogates to deliver letters to Al Quida operatives, the Chechen extremists, and the Iranian mullahs. America will be the laughing stock in the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nakona
Lieutenant


Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 242

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:46 pm    Post subject: Re: The Dangerous Secret Reply with quote

stealthy wrote:
-S-

The Swift-boat controversy is not an ancient molehill turned into a mountain. It's how we're stumbling toward a debate that the Democrats don't want to have — but that everyone knows exists anyway. The real issue here is Kerry's views on war and foreign policy. Kerry is a McGovernite — a long-time member in good standing of his party's dovish wing. Kerry has hidden that fact, but now the truth is slipping out. When Kerry tried to transform his original radicalism into a hawkish parable, those who knew him better rebelled. The ensuing mess has forced the story of who John Kerry is, and always has been, into the public's focus. Whatever secrets his journals and military files may hold, the secret of John Kerry's actual views on war and foreign policy is the more dangerous one — for him, and for us.
http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz200408270856.asp



It's more than that. More fundamental.
I agree with everything you've said, but you forgot something:

John Kerry is a Mid-Level Bureaucrat who has the ambition to be more, but not the skills and character.
By all accounts, he is quite effective at the day-to-day bargaining that goes on in the Senate. Sure, he's far to the left, which is a political issue, but within that context, he seems to do a good job.

However, just because a Mid-Level Bureaucrat has the political savvy to get himself propelled into a more high level job, and the cynicism to "do what it takes" to get there, does NOT mean that he would actually be good at the job he is applying for.


We need someone in that office who will look out for OUR best interests. As a nation, not as a people.

If you want to suck at the democratic teat, that's your perogative, but you should be concentrating on the state and local election, including both houses of congress.

The President is NOT the guy who's going to get you the bigger welfare check, no matter WHO he is.

EDIT: I'm not talking about YOU, I meant the "generic you", refering to a hypothetical democrat.
_________________
13F20P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jataylor11
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 856
Location: Woodbridge, Virginia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kerry can't handle the Islamic terrorists -- he can't handle 250 "old" sailors!!! Wink Wink Wink

(I admire you Swifties and have become addicted to this site)

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU for your service
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Poole
Vice Admiral


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 914
Location: America

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:59 pm    Post subject: Secrets... Reply with quote

From the Federalist: "Several Vietnamese-Americans are suing the University of Massachusetts (Boston).... Not only did the University exclude many South Vietnamese refugees (the plaintiffs allege) but in fact awarded its fellowships to two Communist scholars from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam -- scholars whose sympathies lie with the oppressive Communist regime from which the South Vietnamese fled. What does this have to do with John Kerry? He sides with the University, of course, commending them by letter for "[c]hoosing two established and accomplished scholars from Vietnam." Is it possible that they have "something" on him?
_________________
'58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stealthy
Lieutenant


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 237

PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, he would prefer the version of communists. Wink

Check out a in depth look at this at Captains Quarters blog.
_________________
American Conservative
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hueygunner
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 127
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 4:18 am    Post subject: Iraqi War is no Vietnam... Reply with quote

bach04 wrote:
Kerry and the rest of the democrats are living in the pre 9-11 period. (snip) The Russians are now saying that they found explosives in the wreckage of their planes that crashed.


That's the big difference between Vietnam and Iraq. This time the terrorists are not just satisfied killing American servicemen overseas. They've targeted American civilians right here in lower-48.

Remember the terrorist bombs that killed American servicemen in Saigon? If a terrorist bomb goes off during an anti-war demonstation then they might finally get the message.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J. Toy
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Pa.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't group McGovern with this fraud.

McGovern was a warrior who served honorably.

He is certainly anti-war (who isn't?) and very liberal, but has earned the right to be whatever he chooses.

He is an honorable man who should't have his name included in the same sentence with........
_________________
Corpsman, 1969-1973
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group