|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
integritycounts Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 667
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:45 am Post subject: Swift Boat Vets relive John Kerry’s Genghis “Con”. (great) |
|
|
Swift Boat Vets relive John Kerry’s Genghis “Con”
By Doug Schmitz
Aug 29, 2004, 12:20
http://michnews.com/artman/publish/printer_4910.shtml
“[The] mainstream media refuse to pursue [Kerry’s war record charges]. They have an agenda. The agenda is to bring down George Bush. If they really made these charges a burning issue, Kerry would go down in flames. Because they refuse to make these matters an issue, they won’t be." — Paul M. Weyrich, Accuracy in Media, 8/17/04
COLUMNIST’S NOTE: The following is an in-depth analysis of the 24-hour smear campaign that John Kerry, his media allies and his countless anti-Bush ‘527’ groups have launched against the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, in a deliberate Bill Clinton-style ploy to shift the focus of the group’s valid charges away from Kerry’s alleged war crime accusations he leveled against them in a 1971 Senate hearing, to the Left’s false, trumped-up charges against President Bush. It is a calculated attempt to use this leftist media-generated controversy to further discredit Bush’s re-election bid this fall.
http://michnews.com/artman/publish/article_4910.shtml |
|
Back to top |
|
|
justamom Lt.Jg.
Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you! What a fabulous piece. It's long, but well worth the read!
While it's copyright protected, I'm hoping to pass along to as many as possible. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stylin19 Lt.Jg.
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 122
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hate to pick nits, but his "Edwards lie" about Edwards high draft number is not a lie. (I know, who cares about Edwards)
Supposedly, nobody from the 2/72 draft was drafted. ( The 2/72 draft was for 1973 commitments. ) This lottery was conducted for men who would have been called in 1973; however, no new draft orders were issued after 1972.
After the 1st lottery(12/69), there was no number higher than 125 used for the draft, so Edwards # of 178 WAS high.
If this writer couldn't do his research on this simple thing, what else might be wrong with his article ? _________________ U.S.M.C. - 1969-1971
RVN- 1970-1971 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|