SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Mr. Vietnam Veteran,
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
I B Squidly
Vice Admiral


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 879
Location: Cactus Patch

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dems dat say; don't do. Dems dat do; don't say

-That's Bogey's Hollywood take on a truism from Ecclesiates in the Old Testament.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
d19thdoc
PO3


Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 280
Location: New Jersey Shore

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm wondering if the deeply courteous Michael and LineGrunt had not previously arranged a "good cop - bad cop" ambush here. Probably not.

I have been around the block a lot on the subject of "Yes, but, atrocities were committed in Vietnam, weren't they." They then cite My Lai, a recent revelation in an Ohio newspaper, Bob Kerrey's disputed case, etc.

Since the anti-war activities of John Kerry are about to become a central issue in the campaign, thanks in no small part to SBVT, and since John Kerry's anti-war activities were justified on the basis of war crimes committed by one and all, I think it is time to warn everyone and forearm them on this subject.

Don't argue with people who recite war crimes claims. Whatever war crimes were committed in Vietnam are beside the point and not the issue, unless Kerry's characterization of those allegations was true.

The issue is, Kerry claimed that these activities were U.S policy, that they were known and condoned by all levels of command, that they were virtually the universal experience of all soldiers in Viet Nam. He also claimed that this kind of war had made drug addicts of 60 to 80% of us, that we were ticking time bombs addicted to violence about to explode on the civilian homeland, that mutiny and disobediance of orders was to be expected and was deserved by the government, and that the only solution was to implement, immediately and unilaterally, the proposals of the Vietnamese communists, with whom he had met privately, but not secretely, more than once.

Not one single case of the alleged war crimes "testimony" he relied upon (the "Winter Soldier Investigation") was ever proved, and no evidence for them was ever offered beyond the testimony of the men who made them, in all but a few cases not even corroborated by a second witness - and no convincing authentication of those witnesses was ever made.

Not one war crime that has been documented factually was ever mentioned by any witness at the WinterSoldier Investigation. All attempts by the NIS, on behalf of the Marine Corps, by journalists and by historians - including efforts ongoing today - have been unable to verify any of these allegations. The "witnesses" and their organizers have steadfastly refused to cooperate with any inquires. The only facts about that enterprise that have been established convincingly all discredit the witnesses.

War crimes in Vietnam are not the issue. Dragging them out is the default response of those who want to defend the left's activities in the 70's, and John Kerry's words and actions.

The issue is fabricated propaganda, generated to demoralize the American people and military in war time, for the specific stated benefit of the enemy with whom we were engaging in war at that time.

Over 400 American GIs were executed by the U.S. militray during World War II for war crimes. Over 200,000 French civilan casualties resulted from the allied invasion of France in 1944, beginning on D-Day.

Isn't it curious that all that happened in World War II is almost universally regarded as part of the most noble and heroic militray campaign in history. And whatever did happen in Vietnam is regarded quite differently by the same people. Could it be that the characterization of all of us as mentally deranged criminals, based on the crimes of a few, and the imagined crimes of the many, was deliberately concocted for some purpose other than the advancement of truth and justice?
_________________
For The Honor of the Fifty-Eight Thousand.
"He Can Lose, But He Can Not Hide"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Admin note:

Please reference our note in the following post:


http://www.swiftvets.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=48786#48786


Last edited by Me#1You#10 on Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PO2
Ensign


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 67
Location: TX USA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 am    Post subject: Re: Thank you for the chance. Reply with quote

It was a shock to me how deeply this whole matter has provoked me. After seven years of intensive therapy also, revisiting all of the horrors of Vietnam and "reprocessing" them (all of them perpetrated by the enemy, by the way, on us and on the Vietnamese civilian population - I was a medic and never fired my weapon) - it was a shock to discover that I had not really "recovered" emotionally. Why? Because one of the worst traumas of the entire experience did not happen in Vietnam -[/quote]

Welcome home doc. Statistically, the medics have had the worst time of all of us. Survivor guilt, inadequacy, etc. had hit them realy hard. My hat is off to you. You probably never said, when someone was yelling for a Corspman--Take two asperins and call me in the morning if it is no better.
Rolling Eyes Wink Laughing
_________________
Duty. Honor. Country.
To me, more than just words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PO2
Ensign


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 67
Location: TX USA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michael B. Smith wrote:

But - if the questions are not asked of you, and your brethren, then folks of my generation (a lot of whom are to old to be your children, yet old enough to be your younger siblings) will remain confused about something that is a memory, but nothing we paid attention to!

If the truth is to be told and heard, then I, (we) have to ask you (you being your generation). Most history books, don't say, what the vast majority of you are saying now. This is unfortunate, and hopefully, God willing, the truth can finally be told and the true history can be written.


Michael, so many other Vietnam veterans have already said it, but I would like to add my 2 cents in.

For over 30 years we have been holding in the anger. It has been festering and growing in us. Many of us thought we had put it all behind us, but we didn't. We couldn't. The history books in the schools today give more time to other events of the 60s than they do for the Vietnam war, a war in which over 58,300 good people died. For each and every one of them more than one tear was shead. But not at the time it happened for we were too busy trying to stay alive ourselves. The grieving process was stopped before it began. Then, when we came home and had a chance to start greeving we were bombarded with the nonsense Kerry and his VVAW threw at us. It was never direct, they knew we would cream their backsides if they tried. They did it through the media and through females. We clenched our teeth and went on. The media and the college professors perpetrated the myth of the crazy Nam vet and now it appears in the history books written by some of those same professors.

Usually, it is clamed that "we" lost the Vietnam war. That is not true. We won every battle we fought decisivly. Even the Tet offensive in January 1968 was a failure for the North Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong. After that offensive, they lost the majority of their personnel and equipment, and the General in charge of the NVA stated that they had lost the war at that point. The activities of Kerry, Fonda, and the VVAW pushed the American people to give up on the war. Our "loss" was negotiated at a round table in Paris. The winner was the Government of the People's Republic of Vietnam ( North Vietnam) The same people that Kerry met and consulted with while he still held a commission in the US Navy.

If you can accept the brash responses you get from us, you will learn much that was not taught in school. We were there, and there is no better research than that which is seen by our own eyes. I promise that the ordeal will be nowhere near what was done to you by Jubilum.

BTW, thanks for asking your questions. I would much rather have you do that than to go blindly along in life thinking the wrong things.
_________________
Duty. Honor. Country.
To me, more than just words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PO2
Ensign


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 67
Location: TX USA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michael B. Smith wrote:


I reckon, this is why I wanted to ask of you Vietnam vets about this issue. I'm sure you are not inferring that all this was comman place, but it happened none the less, and this is where I get so damned confused about this issue with Kerry saying what he said in 1971.

I am by no means defending his actions, and I can understand and appriciate how pissed Viet. Vets are about it. But wasn't his saying those things that happened - doing what he thought was best to shed light on this issue during those years?



Yes, they did, Michael. That is part of the unfortunate part of war. Sometimes we had to do what we did in order to keep our people from being over run and killed (at best). It was not, however, used indescrimatly, but when the chance of being over run was high.

Kerry referrs to "free fire zones" as a "war crime" making it sound like we could just open up at will within them, killing anything and everything there. This was not true. A free fire zone was an area in which all "friendlies" had been relocated out to new houses elsewhere. The only people left in the area were enemy. It was automaticly assumed that any people seen there were enemy. Even so, during daylight hours, people moving through the area were not fired upon automatically, they were watched to see if they were just farmers who didn't know better and were going about the business they had been doing all their lives, or if they were desplaying agressive tendencies.

What must be remembered was that Vietnam was an insurgency. The enemy did not wear distinctive uniforms, they used improvised explosive devices and other types of booby traps. Their intention was not to kill GIs, but to wound them for each wounded troop takes 12 people to care for them and that is 12 people who could not hunt down and kill the enemy.

They did not follow the Ganeva Convention at all, in fact, they did not even sign it. We did, and we tried to act in accordance to it. Vietnam was the first modern war which was not conducted in typical fashon, the enemy infiltrated in civilian clothing and attacked from the inside. They didn't care who they killed, we were all just American Soldiers to them no matter our job.
_________________
Duty. Honor. Country.
To me, more than just words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PO2
Ensign


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 67
Location: TX USA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:58 am    Post subject: Re: Linegrunt Reply with quote

Sgt-Keeper wrote:
This was a good post until this poser showed up. Poser because the questions were directed at Viet Nam veterans, not just any veteran, which you may well be. But your answer smacks of hippy disinformation, misinformation, and outright lies. You know nothing about napalm in battle & how it turned the tide in our favor, how many times it was used, or why. Knowing so much, why was it called agent orange? Please cite the source of your quotes. Other than that, "move on" misses you.


Or Yellow, Blue, Black, and a few other colors.

Sign on the side of a spray bird:

Smokey Bear with the words written around him--Only WE can prevent forests. Laughing
_________________
Duty. Honor. Country.
To me, more than just words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
I B Squidly
Vice Admiral


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 879
Location: Cactus Patch

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bare with me milbuds and see if I get this out with any sense:

We often rafted out in South Korean ports. The ROK's had all these WWII surplus ships spiffed and shined better than the builders models. You could not help but notice that their version of NJP was not the 30/30 so familiar but beatings administered at morning quarters. They always impressed with their no-nonsense discipline and professionalism in every rate and rank (the ROCs likewise and the Japanese especially embarassed us with their seamanship [partiing with Japanese bubbleheads did not induce confidence in the 7th Fleet or its carrier groups]).

Before that I'ld encountered two diminutive ROKs stateside in a unversity bar challenged by 6 lunking, football squad, frat boys. Four of those Sigma Nus went to the hospital and none made the next week's game.

Before that I'ld heard that ROKs in 'Nam marked their perimeter with VC heads on cleaning rods. The upshot being that 'Charlie' didn't f**k with the ROKs. The efficacy of such behavior traces to the Bronze Age and made sense. I never knew the truth of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Michael B. Smith
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="d19thdoc"]I'm wondering if the deeply courteous Michael and LineGrunt had not previously arranged a "good cop - bad cop" ambush here. Probably not.<<<<<<


I beg your pardon Sir, and take issue with your accusation that I am in or was in any plot to set that poster up!

(Admin - removed personal information - see my note, below.)<<<

Interesting? apparently bombs can only be hurled one direction!

But whether or not it is important - quien sabe! For I am too great an advocate for Constitutional liberty to complain of its exercise by others – although I may feel it operation in my own person.

Have a great day!
Michael Berryman Smith
_________________
Michael B. Smith


Last edited by Michael B. Smith on Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:21 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael B. Smith
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you Brother for being on the square with me!

And thank you for your service.

Sincerely & fraternally
Michael Berryman Smith
_________________
Michael B. Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DEL
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 08 May 2004
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michael,

You ask fair questions. My sons have ask just about the same things of me.

You have an internet connection. Go look!

Bear in mind during the war in Vietnam journalists were everywhere.
Film, photo,print journalist from all over the world. America's friends and foes alike. They had free access to the entire country of Vietnam. No censorship,no military handlers, no off limits. Go find the photos the stories the films of wide spread atrocities.

Close your eyes for a minute, imagine an America where strangers waited at airports to attack returning vets, where churches in which these vets sought solace shunned them, where the VFW the American Legion refused them membership and the federal government was forced to pass law insuring them the right to work. Why didn't we speak up?
Who would've listened?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael B. Smith
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="DEL"]Michael,

You ask fair questions. My sons have ask just about the same things of me.

You have an internet connection. Go look!<<

thank you - and yes I have been seeking information elsewhere.

I am trying my hardest to obtain and make an informed decision about something that has been either been told in a different light, or not talked about for the last 35 years.

I have said it before on this board and I will say it again - I am not voting Kerry - for reason far beyond this issue. That said - because the issue has come up - it has sparked an interest in me. Perhaps - the best thing to have done would have been to leave it alone.

I have tried to be honest and have no alterior motive beyond my simple questions. I post under my real name and YES - I try to be curtious - not to put any BS over anyone, but because being curtious is the right thing to do to anyone - especially you Viet Vets.

If'n my response (2 post back) seemed rude - I apologize to the board and to all you fine men and ladies present. But I will not be accused of doing something I had no part of.

Yall have said Kerry brought this issue up and yall will finish it. I think this is great - I think it should be aired. But when questions are asked by those of us who do not know - then there is no need to hurl bombs (not speaking to you directly).

I do find it odd that the email off the same that started this thread that I sent to Swift Boats vets not only hasn't been read - it hasn't even been opened as I have recieved no return reciept. I don't understand how we can talk about this issue if questions can't be answered?????

anyway - I do thank you for your service and your frankness in your response.

S&f
Michael Berryman Smith
_________________
Michael B. Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hueygunner
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 127
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Navy_Navy_Navy wrote:
Have you read "Unfit for Command?"

Have you read the messages in these forums that deal with your questions?

People are very good about answering questions, here, but they're not anyone's personal research librarian. Wink



That's what gets me, they join the discussion and then want to be brought up to speed right away. Hey, you're a F.N.G. so pay your dues.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not unique to this board, hueygunner. Wink

I have a yahoo mailing list of 1600+ and we have a lot of FNG's sign on to that and want instant answers - much of what they ask requires an encyclopedia to answer and nearly everything they ask has been asked before and answered many times. It's faster to ask than to read the archives.

Same thing with all the other boards and mailing lists that I own or help to moderate. It's the times, I think. People are too busy to research, and they want answers NOW, which comes off as demanding and self-important.

It's why we've tried to steer toward a Links Consolidation thread and an FAQ thread and tried to get people to read the book. The book is just as clear as spring-water, and it came from the people who were there at the same time, same place, same operating rules - almost every single one of them served right alongside John Kerry.

People who are looking for answers need to be steered to appropriate places to find the information, and they need to remember that if they're too busy to go read and search, everyone else is likewise busy, too, and probably doesn't have time to spoonfeed them. (And this is not aimed at just the originator of this post, but many participants, here.)

Research is tedious and very time-consuming and requires focus. I have neither since I came aboard as a moderator. Very Happy
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michael B. Smith wrote:
d19thdoc wrote:
I'm wondering if the deeply courteous Michael and LineGrunt had not previously arranged a "good cop - bad cop" ambush here. Probably not.<<<<<<


I beg your pardon Sir, and take issue with your accusation that I am in or was in any plot to set that poster up!



You are new here and have not seen the devious and subtle-as-a-brick Wink tricks used by some of the radical elements which have invaded this web site in the past.

This site has been under constant attack and scrutiny by anarchists and leftists from its inception - because they recognized it for the very real threat that it is.

It's generally a good idea when coming onto a new board to read some past postings and get a feel for the board. What's already been asked? What has been answered?

If you have specific questions, they will generally get a raft of accurate answers.

Thank you for keeping it civil.
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 6 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group