SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What kind of apology would work?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
USAF66-70
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 136

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:48 am    Post subject: Kerry apology Reply with quote

Cuda asks: “what could he say that would do him some good?”

I don’t think Kerry can do the full SBVT apology noted in their August 31, 2004 letter to Kerry. Political suicide IMHO.

However, assuming he shows up, I think he’ll attempt a half ass apology at American Legion tomorrow—muddy the waters, attempt to acquire some political advantage and maybe convince McCain he’s “apologized,” and then maybe accuse the SBVT guys of not keeping their side of the agreement when they refuse to stop the ads. He has to do something.

USAF 66-70
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chuck54
PO1


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 466

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I don’t think Kerry can do the full SBVT apology noted in their August 31, 2004 letter to Kerry. Political suicide IMHO.


Yes, but there is a dignified political suicide and there is a sleazy one. The former means a sincere apology and resignation from his candidacy and senate post. If he does that it means he is finally willing to take responsibility for his actions. He would get forgiveness and begin the process of spiritual healing. Then he could finally become a man instead a weasel.

I am not holding my breath.
_________________
"And no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often, than the two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry"

Zell Miller
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ord33
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 670
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with USAF66-70 100%, I think you nailed it exactly, and this is in fact what Sen. Kerry will do tomorrow. Like USAF66-70 said, Kerry will make a half-assed apology, or saying he was "a bit over the top" BS, and then spin it to say that he apologized, and demand, cry, & whine when the SwiftVets dont take down their ads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah. He could make a little-bitty acknowledgment that he may have been a little bit too-too and then turn around and claim that he apologized. He can't genuinely apologize because he still thinks he was right, just as Joe Klein wrote in TIME magazine that what Kerry did was "honorable."
[rubbish]
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dane
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 114
Location: Chile

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The letter is not shown in the Press release section. I hope that it has been released - this morning, hopefully IOT make it into the morning papers and broadcasts.

Dane
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. Return undeserved medals to Navy with letter of regret and explanation.
2. Apologize to all the vets and declare that he was wrong in his accusations of war crimes and atrocities.
3. Resign from all public offices and swear to never seek office again.
4. Condemn Hanoi
5. Condemn Hanoi Jane.
6. Set up a perpetual fund for disabled war veterans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sevry
Commander


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 326

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:19 am    Post subject: Re: What kind of apology would work? Reply with quote

vietnamvet173 wrote:
If Mr. Reporting For Duty were to go on national TV and issue an apology for everything- the medals & awards he recommended himself for, his 1971 betrayal of his fellow veterans


Well, I agree. I don't think an apology matters, really. And I don't really understand this new offer to Kerry prior to his address tomorrow. It almost gives the impression that the 'Swifties' themselves are fatigued, and want to just wrap things up. All Kerry has to do is just hold on for a week or two.

They must think that having Kerry sign SF-180 wouldn't yield what they thought, at one time. I don't know how else to explain it. And what about the Lehman citations, and failure to correct his own DD214, and so on? None of that. It's kind of disappointing, actually. I mean, what have these guys been talking for the last few weeks on talk shows around the country? It doesn't matter now?

Hope the 'Swifties' don't try to grasp defeat from the very jaws of victory.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sevry
Commander


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 326

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dane wrote:
The letter is not shown in the Press release section. I hope that it has been released


The apology request? Gosh - I sure hope NOT!

The 'Swifties' are doing fine. This smacks of something fishy. Is John O'Neill the one who came up with the idea for this? Or was it someone else? Because it makes it look as if the 'Swifties' are almost desperate to fold up their tent and go away. All Kerry has to do is just stonewall - or just say he's sorry for 'being such a hero', and there's your apology. Now quit criticizing me.

I don't understand this letter - at all!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SJorgensen
Former Member


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a Democrat I want Kerry to drop out and renounce the nomination of the Democratic party.

Let me have John Edwards and then let us have an honest election.

I have a feeling that Kerry is going to give us some political drama that only he knows how to give.

He isn't about being a Senator. He is about being a POLITICIAN. He knows more about giving the public the "Big Lie" than even Hitler.

Of course I think the same of his Skull and Bones brother Bush.
I can't stand either one of them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GiveMeFreedom
PO3


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 279
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polaris wrote:
Kerry has been painted into a corner. He can not fulfill the terms of that letter without admitting he was wrong....and totally destroying what is left of his credibility. It would be political suicide.

OTOH, by ignoring the letter, he is admitting that the charges in it are accurate and he looks cowardly. This is lose-lose for Kerry. Worse, by putting the terms on the table, the SBVT has seriously undercut any notion that they are a GOP 'front' campaign except to the pure die-hards....or they will once this offer becomes more generally known.

Personally, I am on pins and needles waiting for Kerry's speech tomorrow before the American Legion. That ought to be ..... interesting..... yes interesting....


Polaris, I agree. I went on my walk tonight and I came to the same conclusion. It's lose-lose for Kerry. He admits he screwed up, then he admits he's a lying sack of stuff, or he doesn't admit anything or apologize then the Swifties continue. Personally, I like option 2 better, but I guess we'll see!
_________________
-------------------
GiveMeFreedom
http://www.anysoldier.com
http://www.operationac.com
Support our Soldiers!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
USAF66-70
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 136

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:18 am    Post subject: SBVT requested apology Reply with quote

Sevry worries that SBVT don’t “grasp defeat from the jaws of victory.” Not at all Sevry, IMHO. Here’s why:

In a nutshell, If Kerry provides a “full public disclosure and a public apology” for all his Vietnam protest lies, exaggerations, & medal tossing; fully clarifies Bay Hap incident; affirms the PH’s were self inflicted scratches; & acknowledges Cambodia was all BS; then SBVT will be “satisfied that the American public has been sufficiently apprised as to these aspects of your career, and we will discontinue the media advertisements you have sought so fervently to silence.”

“Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are eager to close our own personal chapters on Vietnam and instead focus on the war we're currently fighting—the ongoing war on terrorism.” IMHO, this is absolutely the right & honorable thing to do.

Undoubtedly, this would be a win-win. America/its political process wins and SBVT/all vets win. However, Kerry would almost certainly be sunk. Unlike the SBVT, he’ll not do the right thing. He’ll never provide a “full public disclosure and a public apology.”

However, some of us expect he’ll attempt a half-ass “apology.”

USAF 66-70
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sevry
Commander


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 326

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:40 am    Post subject: Re: SBVT requested apology Reply with quote

USAF66-70 wrote:

In a nutshell, If Kerry provides a “full public disclosure and a public apology” for all his Vietnam protest lies, exaggerations, & medal tossing; fully clarifies Bay Hap incident; affirms the PH’s were self inflicted scratches; & acknowledges Cambodia was all BS; then SBVT will be “satisfied that the American public has been sufficiently apprised as to these aspects of your career, and we will discontinue the media advertisements you have sought so fervently to silence.”


That's not how it reads. And there are more questions than that. The 'Swifties' raised a lot of issues, and even got some of the facts wrong in their own book. But the information and questions became clearer over the weeks and months. And now people who are not 'Swifties', the ones they wish to reach by advertizing, are involved, engaged, and they want to know - themselves.

Here's a few questions that perhaps you can answer, if Kerry can't, though he should:

Was Kerry under heavy fire, or any enemy fire, when he pulled Rassman from the water? Were the boats under any fire, period, at any time, in the area of that fishing net?

What was Rassman's duty on 13 MAR? Was he an awards clerk for SF? And did he write Kerry's SS citation? Did he write others?

How did Rassman get a PH for 13 MAR? No one mentioned that he was injured prior to approaching the net? Did he get a PH for falling overboard? Where's the report on his injury?

Did Kerry flee the scene, traveling miles down river before returning? How many miles is 5000 meters? Does Kerry still insist he took fire from both banks the entire trip? and why did he come back through that, particularly if he fled what he thought was a firefight to begin with?

Did Kerry write the report, for that day? Did his report poison the judgments of command, up and down the line, who relied on his report?

Where's the report on Kerry's injury from 2 DEC? And was now ex-Admiral Schachte present, perhaps in the bow position? Is Zaldonis lying and was he even there? Is Runyon lying? What does Kerry say?

Was the 2nd PH self-inflicted, or did Kerry receive fire from shore, which also wounded another, that day?

Did Kerry order PCF's to beach on a 'peat' bank when hit by RPG fire? Did Belodeau leave the boat and take his M60? Was the 'tub gunner' unable to get a bead with the boat beached? Did he later open fire as the kid/VC ran further back into his view? Was the enemy still armed? Was the enemy alone? Was the enemy severely wounded? Did Kerry kill him execution-style behind a 'hootch', or in plain view? And so on. Was it something for which a man is given a Silver Star?

Was Kerry approached by Tom Wright and others when they heard of his third PH? And did they ask him to leave, to take advantage of a Navy reg allowing immediate reassignment for three wounds (presumeably because three serious wounds would be particularly disabling)? Did Kerry refuse their request? Having been against it, was he suddenly for it, the next day, and departed?

Did Kerry receive special privilege in being appointed an aide a few days after requesting reassignment? Did Kerry engage in activities proscribed by the UCMJ while under those orders?

When was Kerry detached from the service? Was he AWOL at any time upon his return?

How does Kerry explain having three separate citiations for his Silver Star, and two for his Bronze Star, spaced over the course of a decade or more? The man whose signature was used, John Lehman, cannot explain it himself.

And so on. That's not even getting to his VVAW antics, his medal-toss, his testimony which so enraged John O'Neill.

Then, of course, he was a . . US Senator?

That's just a few. Now, of course, if a guy like Kerry has been LYING to himself constantly over the years, if he was put to it, would he even know the answers himself at this point?

Even IF KERRY WANTED TO COME CLEAN, would he himself be a reliable witness?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.P. Wily
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The letter from SBVfT heightens my concern that a route has opened up for Kerry to give a half-assed apology and E & E the whole issue.

My own thought is that he will address point 1 in the letter, and go on at length about being caught up in the "mood of the times", and the "unjustness of the war", blah, blah, blah which led him to become overly dramatic. I think if he mentions point 4, it will be a "faulty memory" excuse, "seared" notwithstanding.

Then, as I mentioned in my previous post, the spin machine starts with the "what more do you want, he's apologized".

Even if he only addresses point 1 in the letter, the vast majority will accept that Kerry apologized and dismiss any of the other SBVfT points as nit-picking. Further SWVfT ads would just solidify the belief that SBVfT are irrational hate-mongers, allowing the MSM to disregard their message without a second thought. In fact, more ads after an "apology" could very likely cause a backlash effect in Kerry's favor.

Sorry, just calling it as I see it. Sad

Edit: Then again, maybe they really are stupid:

http://www2.swiftvets.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6922
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 4:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please read the letter again.

John Kerry is said to be set to launch a further attack on the Swifts in his speech the American Legion tomorrow.

He has to go through with that or he will look like he is backing down.

There is no way that he can answer the charges that the Swifts have made in that letter without losing credibility.

Note, he wasn't given the option to "Just do any ONE of the above and we'll stop." The conditions were completely laid out as to what John Kerry can do to make the ads stop. Brilliant move, Swifts!!!!

John Kerry, in his narcissism, will NEVER agree to those conditions.

He doesn't even believe that any of what he did was wrong, folks! The only traction coming out of this is going to go to the Swifts.
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dane
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 114
Location: Chile

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 4:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can´t believe that he is going to address the VFW. On the surface, this seems the height of stupidity. So he must have a game plan. Perhaps, after being politely listened to, he will use that as "proof" that the vets are not against him and, therefore, it is just "one" political attack group that is after him?

Dane
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group