SwiftVets.com

joeshero · Commander Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 321 Location: Midwest

1. Need to have a nationwide press conference -- well if the targets are the battleground states, then should be focused on those states.

2. The October attack!! SVFT should launch a surprise October attack with irrefutable facts and deadly messages.

3. Need to focus on the anti-war Kerry's activities and link it to his "Unfitness" for command. Should be in the line of Zell Miller's "spitballs". So, Kerry's anti-war is basically anti-strong defense.

4. The die has been rolled and whether one disagree or not, SVFT is walking in a political zone. However, it must make it clear to the public that it stays away from partisan politics. The REAL objective is to SHOW the public that Kerry is really UNFIT for command.
_________________
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

DaveL · Commander Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 300

A national press conference seems like a great idea...let them ask any and all of the questions they want of the SBVT. Perhaps we can get past having the MSM constantly dismiss the SBVT charges against Kerry as "now debunked", "unsubstantiated", "largely discredited" in nearly every MSM report I see...it pisses me off! It just isn't true!

bhlewis · Ensign Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 63

O'Neill should stress that none of the charges have been debunked, and that Kerry should sign the SF-180 forms on the Dennis Miller Show this friday.

Slednfool · Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:31 am Post subject:

bhlewis · Ensign Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 63

No. He should just stress that kerry needs to sign those papers to clear his name because Bush has already done so. The prepositional phrase "on the Dennis Miller Show this friday" refers to both the points.

Slednfool · Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:40 am Post subject:

Oops, misread that, too many John's. I thought O'Neil was going to be on the show on Thursday.

Steve Z · Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:28 am Post subject: New Strategy?

I agree with JoesHero, with one addition:

There should be an ad where Kerry's Senate testimony calling for rapid withdrawal is played back, with his prediction of 3,000 casualties, followed by Senator Aiken's reminder (in 1971) that 800,000 people had to be saved when the French lost at Diem Bien Phu, followed by a voice-over telling the true casualties, followed by Kerry's 2004 statements about withdrawing from Iraq in 6 months. Then ask the viewer whether someone so wrong about troop withdrawals should be trusted to be Commander in Chief.

Outside of veteran's issues...SBVT needs to reach voters about why Kerry would be dangerous to command troops in the CURRENT war!
_________________
The traitor will crater!