View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rovercop Ensign
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 52 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:50 am Post subject: Good Synopsis of Bush's National Guard Time |
|
|
Concise, comprehensive, in defense of our President.
http://www.hillnews.com/york/090904.aspx
Rovercop _________________ USAF, Ret
AMC SATCOM (TALCE) / Ramstein
'Waterloo' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leeinwv PO3
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Posts: 268
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
good report of truth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fabius Cunctator Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 84 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
My own experience bears this out. Although I had a high draft lottery number (turned 18 in 1970), I felt an obligation to serve, as my father had done in WWII, and as my cousins had done before me (1950's and 1960's). I had my heart set on joining the Marines as an officer, but I wanted to fly, and did check the Air Force. The recruiters ALL told me that they were in the middle of a RIF, and didn't want any new pilots. The Army wasn't looking for any new officers, either. So, this confirmed my choice of the Marine Corps.
The real ---kicker was, when I finally entered the Marine Corps after graduation in 1974 and took my physical, I found I was nearsighted and couldn't fly after all. So, I became a ground pounder, and have enjoyed it ever since.
But the point is, "W" did nothing wrong here...as the article points out.
________________________________________________________
Quintus Fabius Maximus Cunctator
USMCR – 1974 to the present.
"Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum; qui victoriam cupit, milites inbuat diligenter; qui secundos optat eventus, dimicet arte, non casu. Nemo provocare, nemo audet offendere quem intellegit superiorem esse, si pugnet." - F. Vegetii Renati Epitoma Rei Militaris, AD 380 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skypilot Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 82 Location: Eastern PA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Z Rear Admiral
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 687 Location: West Hartford CT
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:30 pm Post subject: Bush and Kerry's Service |
|
|
Thank you for the excellent post, Rovercop!
One thing I found interesting is that Lt. G. W. Bush's training was 80 weeks--"not 80 weeks of weekends" but 80 full weeks.
Kerry is proud of his military record, but if you count a year on the Gridley (52 weeks) and 4 months, 12 days (about 19 weeks) in Vietnam, that comes to a total of 71 weeks. This would mean that Lt. GW Bush spent more time TRAINING than Lt. (jg) Kerry spent in active service!
Somebody might want to present this comparison to the media (with the appropriate spin)... _________________ The traitor will crater! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frank B Ensign
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 58 Location: Montana
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So Bush Sr. pulls strings to get Bush Jr. some preferential treatment. Back then, was that so uncommon among the influential and powerful who had draft age sons or whose sons were already serving?? If the hairbrained dipwads consider this tainted military service, how do they stack that against Kerry's embellished military record, his giving aid and comfort to and consorting with the enemy, throwing away his medals, his disparaging of honorable Vietnam veterans, the flag burnings and other seditious anti-war activities, including plans to assassinate pro-war Congressmen??
If Kerry wants to debate his military time and anti-war activities, he better have a large jar of Vaseline handy!! _________________ "Any government that believes money should be taken from Peter to pay Paul will, of course,
have the support of Paul" -- G B Shaw |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This topic will be moved to Geedunk
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul R. PO3
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 273 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read this somewhere. Maybe someone can confirm / complete the info.
665 F-102's were put into service?
70 pilots died in F-102 crashes?
(Did this include any shot down in 'Nam?)
How many other pilots were injured?
How many of the F-102's crashed or were shot down before the last were taken out of service? (I'd expect some pilots were able to safely eject.)
How does this compare with other aircraft?
Is there documentation that Bush volunteered for 'Nam?
Huh, I am waiting for someone to spin this as showing Bush was a reckless fool to even get in a F-102! _________________ Paul R. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|