SwiftVets.com

[Se7eN]

I thought he said the only thing Kerry was fit to command was a surfboard

[azpatriot]

[RivanG]

[sround]

RE: RivanG Request for DC March Video.

Sorry...don't have one, but I would be happy to
provide tech services (editing, converting, ripping, and web space)
to anyone who has a video and would like to share it.
Given that the MSM completely ignored the march,
I'd say it's very much worth the effort.



This just in: CBS News finds Loch Ness monster in Houston bathtub.
_________________

Mission Accomplished!!

[rlmorel]

[BB Stacker]

[MKorner]

I am new, but have been hounding this wonderful site for weeks now, because I, too, feel that John Kerry is not a valid choice for our President.

I did see John O'Neill on Hannity and Colmes, last night. I typed from the site below the part of the interview that made my eyes grow wide. Wouldn't this be interesting to have put out there somewhere for all voters to know?

I'm also wishing there were more of an emphasis 'out there' that Kerry did not get his honorable discharge until 2001. That is just too strange!

sround wrote:
MP3 Format
H&C _ O'Neill - Part II 4:35 http://s2r-tech.com/swifty/hc_oneill-2.mp3

Transcript:

Hannity: . . . What advice would you (to John O'Neill) give the uh the president having debated him (Kerry) back then?

O'Neill: I - I think John Kerry is one of the most skilled debaters I've ever run into. Uh, ah, uhhh, without question, Sean. I mean I've - I've run into other people. Well, this is the most skilled guy. His, uh, strength and his weakness is the same. He'll say anything about anything. He'll lie about anything. If I was gonna debate John Kerry again, i would stick to basic, simple themes and I would know that John Kerry was going to say things that simply weren't true in the course of the debate.

Hannity: Yeah, well do you know it's interesting because Bill Wells says about the same thing that you just said. Did you know that?

O'Neill: No, I .. I didn't. Uh and of course he would have run into him much more recently. But John Kerry is smooth, he's polished, he's persuasive. But it's amazing when you went back - go back over the transcript of the debate - he reported a false - I mean he claimed there was a mutiny of our unit. It never occurred. Uh, he claimed that he spent two weeks trying to decide whether or not to leave Vietnam. He spent three days, uh, at most because that's how long it took for his request to make it.

Allan Colmes: All right Mr. O'neill, thank you very . . .
(End)

{ I added the bold and the (italics) }

[Stacman]

All I know is that Colmes (on a daily basis) makes me want to jump in the television and ***** slap him.

Just love the way he directs an interview by picking little snippets of quotes by the guest only to serve his point, and then cuts off the entire context of the quote, and speeds on to the next in rapid fire succession...

[BB Stacker]

[quote="jataylor11"]

[tony54]

I agree with BB Stacker, no use Hannity pounding a dead horse.
He should move on to other subjects, like Kerry meeting in Paris with the enemy of the state during a war, while he was still an officer of the USN.
To anyone-else not protected by the DNC and the LMS it would be TREASON!
Why not him? POS!

[jataylor11]

I believe that you are missing the point. The MSM went on and on about Abu Gharib for weeks, including setting up Rumsfeld for being removed and Bush for impeachment. Yet the "crimes" committed at this prison are substantially less than even those actions that Kerry admits commiting.

First, there is a double standard here. The MSM and DNC is head hunting up the chain of command because of Abu Gharib, yet are supporting for POTUS someone who has admitted to worse.

Second, soldiers are going to jail for Abu Gharib, Kerry is running for POTUS.

Third, the double standard of anyone soldier from Abu Gharib sitting in prison while a POTUS kerry (shudder) sits in the White House.

While this may not be the important issue to the Swift Vets --- this issue will play with the soccer moms. The questions for the soccer moms are

(1) should the Abu Gharib soldiers be punished for committing war crimes ... answer yes,

(2) Should soldiers who comitted the war crime of burning homes of civilians go to jail...
answer yes,

(3) Did you know John Kerry admits to burning villages ....
Answer ......blank stare...

(4) Should these soldiers go to jail while John Kerry goes to the White House?

[BB Stacker]

jataylor11,

Your points are well taken, but other than Kerry's own statements, is there any direct evidence that Kerry actually committed any war crimes? He may have burnt some huts but I don't know the circumstances. I think at this point it's obvious that he invented the bulk of these confessions and statements to impress upon the Senate and News Media of the day that we were all murderers and rapists, and that the Government told us to do it.

I believe that there are far better points to make in showing the true calculating Kerry. There is plenty to show he is willing to lie and hurt anyone he has to to further his political goals. Nothing has change since his days in VVAW. He is still doing it.

If we put forth a point in the mannor you suggested so as to gain the soccer moms support, we are no better than Moveon.org. There is a target rich environment in Kerry's real behavior without pushing one of his lies as if it were true. If we get caught in a false premiss it will backfire. We cannot become them.

[zinfella]

[W.P. Wily]