|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BB Stacker Seaman
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 150 Location: Eustis Fl
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Debs wrote: | CBS cannot tell who their source is because to do so might subject them to election fraud charges, if the source is connected to the DNC or the Kerry campaign. This would doom the Kerry campaign and help Bush. IMHO, the DNC, the Kerry campaign and CBS are in collusion in this fraud because if CBS knew they had been defrauded, they should be furious and demand answers - but instead they will not admit the memos are fake and direct their anger to the blogs instead of the source who defrauded them - obvious to me, CBS is a willing part of this fraud, and can never reveal their source.
http://www.americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=679
Debbie |
I agree Debs. I don't believe cBS will come clean till the election is over. If the Dems are involved in this, a real possibility, it would be devestating for them. Not only to Kerry, but to other races across the country. A Republican juggernaut could result. This could be enough reason to keep cBS stonewalling in spite of the damage to its reputation. I can see the Dems and the rest of the MSM coming to their defense later for falling on their sword now. Call it take one for the (liberal) gipper.
I hope R Reagan forgives me for the charactorization. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CandiM LCDR
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 411
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Beatrice1000 wrote: | I hear the dems have a commercial out already using Rather's show on this issue? Fast, even for them, huh... could be they already knew all the facts ahead of time and just needed to plug in the pics? Just wondering... |
Yeah--It's here
http://www.democrats.org/fortunateson/index.html
High drama at it's most insipid--C _________________ “I haven’t seen anyone milk this much out of a bad boat ride since Gilligan” -- Dennis Miller |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cipher Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, we've got some pros working over REAL official documents from LEGITIMATE sources that are in the works.
I have no doubt the heat will be turned up quite a bit.
By the time all is said and done, an *alledged* failure to report for an unnecessary flight physical is going to pale in comparison to wanton lying under oath, perjury before congress, entreating with the enemy in time of war, collusion, conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the enemy, not to mention treason.
Somehow I just can't seem to equate those two sets of charges.
We live in interesting times. _________________ USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Debs Lieutenant
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 228 Location: Lubbock, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
BB Stacker,
You are right as CBS will stonewall and try to drag this out and never confirm the memos are forgeries, hoping it will die down and nothing will happen before the election. We cannot let this happen - they must be held accountable NOW.
Debbie _________________ "No greater love..." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cipher Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the one hand, we have ONE 86 year old secretary who says she remembers (has she SIGNED a sworn affidavit in front of a judge under penalty of perjury???) typing some memos about a flight physical (which was NOT due until his birthday month, some two months AFTER the alleged dates on the forged memos), but not typing the forged memos, testifying to the content which is directly contractory to other known good OFFICIAL documentation. And several document experts who have issues with the documents, however, they are dismissed and cited as "experts" who validate the documents they claim are unsupportable? And has any of THEM signed an affidavit in front of a judge under penalty of perjury?
And on the other hand, there is video, audio, OFFICIAL documentation (in some cases, two or three SETS of "official" documentation!), and the sworn affidavits of dozens of eye witnesses, which prove beyond any reasonable doubt that John Kerry is not only lied ONCE, but has a long and documented history of lying repeatedly.
Which story does CBS go with? _________________ USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cipher Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
You see, this wasn't EXACTLY the way this story was supposed to play out. This story was to be Dan Rather's Swan Song. His claim to fame. His "Watergate".
This is the way it was SUPPOSED to happen:
1) Early September, release the "incriminating documents" . Seed the doubt.
2) A week passes, some "buzz" is generated in the MSM, some talking heads pour over the content of the memos on the Sunday shows.
3) The next week, dribble more "revelations", bring out the "eyewitness" testimony. Build the tension. More Sunday shows, and the Morning Shows.
4) Early October. Build more anticipation. Create new documents to support an ever-building "case" against the president. Get congressmen and senators on board.
5) Build the momentum. Set off push polls to demonstrate the people's shift of perception. Late night shows with in-depth analysis.
6) Mid October. Whip the population into a frenzy. Start rumors of impeachment proceedings. More talking heads.
7) Last week of October. One massive document dump that supports all the allegations and more.
8) Election Day. Party at DNC headquarters.
The problem is those guys in pajamas popped the bubble in ONE news cycle. The story was DEAD by Thursday afternoon, and CBS was cannon fodder on the Sunday shows. Bummer.
Well, Dan. Be careful what you wish for. You got your "Watergate". _________________ USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BB Stacker Seaman
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 150 Location: Eustis Fl
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Debs wrote: | BB Stacker,
You are right as CBS will stonewall and try to drag this out and never confirm the memos are forgeries, hoping it will die down and nothing will happen before the election. We cannot let this happen - they must be held accountable NOW.
Debbie |
We will hold them accountable, but not everyone is in the blogisphere. They must defend their base now. Not the hardcore leftists, they don't really care what the truth is anyway, but the ignorant that don't take the time to become informed. The ones who still think the MSM is without bias. They're the ones still in play. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BuffaloJack Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 1637 Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey CBS and I know you will read this, because you have an army of clones going over this board.
"A Preponderance of Evidence?" What ambulance chaser told you to say that?
I don't care how many lies, forged documents and innuendos you guys stack up, it won't stand a chance against one simple truth.
You guys lied and won't admit it.
Own up to being duped by the fabricated documents, you'll have a few days of uncomfortable embarassment, you can sacrifice a couple of scapegoats, and life will go on.
If you continue to shore up your position that the TANG documents are genuine, you will lose credibility forever. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GaryD Seaman Recruit
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:07 am Post subject: CBS BS |
|
|
Debs,
Never fear. CBS is is deep do-do and they know it. Dan RATher's ego is having a major hissy fit. He must know deep inside that he is imploding along with Kerry's campaign. I remember him crying with joy when Clinton was announced the winner in that election and his idiotic statetments that long night during the last election whey he made an ass out himself. We really should be celebrating all the help that they are giving us because of their blind hatred for GW, they haven't figured how stupid they really are. The Media and the Hollywood elite morons keep on believing that they are smarter that we are. They are so smart that they can't figure out that the joke is now on them!!!! More and more of us are not paying to see their movies, not buying their newspapers and not watching the major networks. Try e-mailing some of the ad sponsers and letting them know you will not buy their products for all of your good reasons. Believe me, they do not like to hear this.
Keep the Faith
Gary _________________ USASA 66-70 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Michmaddave Ensign
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Deny and buy time. CBS is trying to drag this out until something else eclipses it. Then in the future they will claim it as a great victory. We can keep it front and center, and make them answer to their extremist left wing opinion support now because we now have FOX and Talk Radio as well as the internet "blogs".
Good job everyone!
We will not let them get away with it this time due to their domination of the media, their monopoly of the news. The days of the "anchorman" are OVER! _________________ To model our political system upon speculations of lasting tranquility, is to calculate on the weaker springs of the human character.
---Alexander Hamilton
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wally626 Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 85 Location: Yorktown
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Rather didn't know the memos were fake when he did the broadcast. Usually the way these things work is they have a meeting a producer gets assigned the story and when they are done they give a script to the anchor and he goes with the story. i doubt he even asked if the memos were authentic. There is clear bias in CBS selecting this story over say the Swiftboats, or what Kerry did not fulfill his reserve commitments but no actual fraud on Dan's part. After it was clear the memos were fakes is were Dan started his fraudulent activities. That, at this point in time, he can say they documents are good is really unbelievable. Lets face it CBS has confessed to fraud before, documents and setting the bombs to prove that the truck gas tanks were dangerous. (that may have been another network) so why not now? Dan could always blame the producer or burn the source. There has got to be a really good reason he is not folding. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cipher Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I think Rather didn't know the memos were fake when he did the broadcast. |
There is no way he could NOT have known they were forged. Even if he was an idiot, which he isn't (although he may act the part). Even if he was clueless about military documents (which he WOULDN'T be, if he had bothered to investigate the Kerry case, which is repleat with military documents). He was TOLD by several of his hired guns they had issues. He just chose to ignore them, and wilfully put out the story IN FULL KNOWLEDGE the documents were forgeries.
And he had possession of the documents for SIX WEEKS! And has been "working on the story" for over 4 years.
No, he's dirty. Bought and paid for. _________________ USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CandiM LCDR
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 411
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
wally626 wrote: | I think Rather didn't know the memos were fake when he did the broadcast. Usually the way these things work is they have a meeting a producer gets assigned the story and when they are done they give a script to the anchor and he goes with the story. i doubt he even asked if the memos were authentic. |
It doesn't matter, though--He put his name on the story and he went on national TV and presented it--That makes him responsible for it--
Now, since that seems to be the way he want's to play this thing, he'll go down with it--And, believe me, I'll shed no tears over it--C _________________ “I haven’t seen anyone milk this much out of a bad boat ride since Gilligan” -- Dennis Miller |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|