View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Paul R. PO3
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 273 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A few thoughts:
Israel's Intel is better than ours -- ours is still recovering from the '90's.
I don't "know" any Iranians in Iran, but, I was following a few bloggers there for a while. One "Lady Sun" comes to mind, but she seems to have vanished & now some other (business) website comes up when I go to that link.... Don't get me wrong, she's no Bushie, but she and a lot of other Iranians are pro-freedom and hate their oppressive gov't. The problem is, their fear is even greater, and "Lady Sun" abruptly going "off the air" may put an exclamation point on that.
Can we somehow help those who want freedom in Iran? That's one considerable question, but the answer is not to "nuke" them all.
Israel is not going to nuke anybody unless Israel is attacked by WMD.
But if Iran is a threat, the Israelis will handle it. _________________ Paul R. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eXcel wrote: | doll wrote: | I believe the military referes to this as "Collateral Damage". | whatever you say lady. time for a reality check |
Last edited by Guest on Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eXcel Seaman
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you are advocating the "let Israel nuke um all and be done with it" idea? You are nuts if you think that is a viable solution or a moral one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TEWSPilot Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1235 Location: Kansas (Transplanted Texan)
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There were Iranians in my Air Force Undergraduate Pilot Training class, and although rich and arrogant, they were our allies in the middle east...of course, that was long before Jimmy Carter sold them out (is he a good friend of John Kerry?) and undermined the entire military/political structure in the region. Maybe he and Kerry drink the same flavor of Kool Aid.
...not trying to get religious or going off the deep end, but some fairly bright philosophers a long time ago alluded to a situation similar to what is beginning to transpire in the middle east, but of course that eventually concludes with something referred to down the road as "The Battle of Armageddon"...you don't suppose? <<feversihly trying to find Soddom and Gemorah on a map of the ancient middle east>>
...I've got a question. Let's suppose another country built a nuclear weapon and then made arrangements to detonate it in a major population center in the United States, you know, where there were millions of civilians as the intended target. And suppose we negotiated with them not to do it, but they were intent on doing it even using suicide bombers to set it off. Add as many other means as you want to persuade them NOT to do it, but they all fail. Would the government of the United States be morally obligated to destroy that capability using whatever method it took before they reached the point of completing that dastardly task even if it meant causing civilian casualties in their country? What if the target were Israel? What should their government do? _________________ Find the perfect babysitter, petsitter, or tutor -- today!
Last edited by TEWSPilot on Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eXcel wrote: | So you are advocating the "let Israel nuke um all and be done with it" idea? You are nuts if you think that is a viable solution or a moral one. |
I trust are up to speed with the latest on MSM. The US military is selling to the Isrealis bunker busters to enable them to nuetralize an illegal and unnecessary nuclear program. Iran needs nuclear power for electricity like you need a whole in your head. The reality here is that Iran is the largest sponser of terrorism than any other nation in the world. On another note, we should be grateful to the Isreali military for taking out Saddam's nuclear program back in the 1980's. Could you just imagine if Saddam had been allowed to develop a nuclear capability? There would be no Isreal, there would be no Iran, there would be no Saudi Arabia. I think you get my meaning.
Isreal is capable of a precision strike just as the US is so there would be minimal "colateral damage". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jataylor11 Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 856 Location: Woodbridge, Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eXcel wrote: | So you are advocating the "let Israel nuke um all and be done with it" idea? You are nuts if you think that is a viable solution or a moral one. |
What is moral about Iran developing nuclear weapons? Why does Iran need nuclear weapons? With Saddam gone there is no danger of another Iran/Iraq war. There isn't any country in that part of the world poised to use nuclear weapons against Iran. Why does Iran need nuclear weapons?
Viable solution yes -- it does not matter what country blows up the Iranian facility --- just as long as it disappears from the face of the earth --- yes this is a viable solution.
Who is Iran planning on using nukes against anyway? Another muslim country or against Israel? They are not developing weapons to reach to the other side of the world --- just the other side of the Middle East.
Does Israel have a right to a pre-emptive strike --- YES they do. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jataylor11 wrote: |
What is moral about Iran developing nuclear weapons? Why does Iran need nuclear weapons? With Saddam gone there is no danger of another Iran/Iraq war. There isn't any country in that part of the world poised to use nuclear weapons against Iran. Why does Iran need nuclear weapons?
Viable solution yes -- it does not matter what country blows up the Iranian facility --- just as long as it disappears from the face of the earth --- yes this is a viable solution.
Who is Iran planning on using nukes against anyway? Another muslim country or against Israel? They are not developing weapons to reach to the other side of the world --- just the other side of the Middle East.
Does Israel have a right to a pre-emptive strike --- YES they do. |
I should have had you make my case in point! Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azpatriot Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 593 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ProtestWarriors state this so eloquently.
_________________ Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Se7eN Seaman Recruit
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look at how small Israel is. They haven't survived that region of the world by being complacent or ignorant.
I'm confident they will deal with this situation appropriatley, with or without the help of the US. As a matter of fact, they teach us how to do anti-terrorism intel gathering.
They also possess missile technology they refuse to share with anyone.
I hope Israel sends out a message for the 21st century creatons of the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul R. PO3
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 273 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doll,
Pretty big difference between a precision strike and "nuking them all".
I would hope we are on a little higher thought level than the terrorists. _________________ Paul R. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul R. PO3
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 273 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, "AZ",
You should add the most populous Muslim country in the world, Indonesia!
And then there's Malaysia, and....
When it comes to survival, the Israelis have a pretty good handle on it. _________________ Paul R. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azpatriot Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 593 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul R. wrote: | Hey, "AZ",
You should add the most populous Muslim country in the world, Indonesia!
And then there's Malaysia, and....
When it comes to survival, the Israelis have a pretty good handle on it. |
Yep they sure do! There saying is "Never Again" and they sure mean it _________________ Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul R. wrote: | Doll,
Pretty big difference between a precision strike and "nuking them all".
I would hope we are on a little higher thought level than the terrorists. |
Yes we are. I am angry about all the dispicable things going on and should have phrased that better. When I said "nuking them all", I meant the idiots creating the nukes that will use them to hurt civilian peoples who have nothing to with what is going on and unfortunately, if a precision strike fails, there would be some colatoral damage. I do not wish for there to be coloateral damage, but unfortunately in war there always seems to be. There is no negotiating with Iran (radical government/not peoples)or the terrorists. Do you have a better solution? Because talking goes no where. Thanks for the above thoughts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Navy_Navy_Navy Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone who's riled, take a chill moment. Visit the parody threads or go make some coffee.
It's easy to understand that emotions run high regarding this topic, and when your emotions are engaged, they can outrun your logic in getting to the keyboard.
There is an edit function available to you with which you can go back and clarify your thoughts on the matter.
There is an edit function which is also valuable for toning down your rhetoric when you realize that you've gone a little over the top or when you see that you've blasted another member unnecessarily.
After you click the "Edit" key, there is a "delete" option available to you.
Use these options as you see fit.
All of you are valuable members of this forum. Let's please speak to each other with that in mind.
Keep your eyes on the prize - we cannot let John Kerry have any more control over our armed forces or foreign policy than he already does.
Thanks! Y'all are great! _________________ ~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eXcel Seaman
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TEWSPilot wrote: | ...I've got a question. Let's suppose another country built a nuclear weapon and then made arrangements to detonate it in a major population center in the United States, you know, where there were millions of civilians as the intended target. And suppose we negotiated with them not to do it, but they were intent on doing it even using suicide bombers to set it off. Add as many other means as you want to persuade them NOT to do it, but they all fail. Would the government of the United States be morally obligated to destroy that capability using whatever method it took before they reached the point of completing that dastardly task even if it meant causing civilian casualties in their country? What if the target were Israel? What should their government do? | Without question yes. and I am also praying that this doesn't turn into armageddon although it seems certainly possible...
doll wrote: | I trust are up to speed with the latest on MSM. The US military is selling to the Isrealis bunker busters to enable them to nuetralize an illegal and unnecessary nuclear program. Iran needs nuclear power for electricity like you need a whole in your head. The reality here is that Iran is the largest sponser of terrorism than any other nation in the world. On another note, we should be grateful to the Isreali military for taking out Saddam's nuclear program back in the 1980's. Could you just imagine if Saddam had been allowed to develop a nuclear capability? There would be no Isreal, there would be no Iran, there would be no Saudi Arabia. I think you get my meaning. | No one is arguing about that.
Quote: | Isreal is capable of a precision strike just as the US is so there would be minimal "colateral damage". | Thats not what you had said before, and not what I took issue with.
azpatriot wrote: | ProtestWarriors state this so eloquently.
| I think you guys misunderstand me from the amount of hostile and knee jerk reactions that are being posted.
Navy_Navy_Navy wrote: | Everyone who's riled, take a chill moment. Visit the parody threads or go make some coffee.
[...]
Keep your eyes on the prize - we cannot let John Kerry have any more control over our armed forces or foreign policy than he already does.
Thanks! Y'all are great! | No problem admin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|