View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:35 pm Post subject: Was Bush Honorably Discharged? |
|
|
The New York Times wrote an article that questions GWB's right to an honorable discharge, citing that the gaps in his service record were never fully explained. Interestingly the Swifties raised questions about JK's activities after his senate hearing, yet, The New York Times glibly glosses over it as a non-bonified issue.
I do not know about you, but I believe the testimony and documented evidence that the Swifties have presented surely out weighs in its relevance to some New York Times story.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scott Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 1603 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This story has been a non-starter for the leftists in every one of George W. Bush's political campaigns.
The Times is poking around in the dark, hoping something small, brown and furry will come running out into the light.
It hasn't worked yet. George Bush remains, despite all efforts to the contrary, honorably discharged from the TANG. _________________ Bye bye, Boston Straggler! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
God and Country PO3
Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Posts: 274 Location: God's country
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
President Bush is definitely honorably discharged.
The communist have been poking at this for years.
_________________ Conservative and proud |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oasis Lieutenant
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 201 Location: Florida, want some sun? LoL!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
eXcel Seaman
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the ANG knows better about what he deserved 30 years ago than the NYT does 30 years later. But what do I know |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianC PO2
Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 364
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Of course, the NY Times (didn't they used to be a newspaper) can continue to ignore Kerry's record DURING the past 20 years... after all, who'd want to hear about THAT, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ASPB Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 1680
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone the wants the definitive 10 printed page piece to rebut this crap you'll find it here!
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/guest/2004/jw_0920.shtml
The best advice I can give on the topic when talking to your moonbat friends...refer them to Mary Mapes and Dan Rather with a gratis quart of purple Kool-aid. Secondly ask where Kerry's records are...Where's the SF-180? _________________ On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neverforget Vice Admiral
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 875
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
None of these idiots in the leftist media understand the concept of aircraft being phased out, glut of pilots returning in 1972, ability to amass training points, that the National Guard is part-time service after training and active duty time is finished, and an early-out, which were a common occurrence in the early '70's as US forces in Viet Nam were drawn down.
Why don't they understand:
1. It doesn't fit their ideology;
2. Many of them avoided any military service to our country; not all, but many;
3. They are a**holes. _________________ US Army Security Agency
1965-1971 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
neverforget wrote: | None of these idiots in the leftist media understand the concept of aircraft being phased out, glut of pilots returning in 1972, ability to amass training points, that the National Guard is part-time service after training and active duty time is finished, and an early-out, which were a common occurrence in the early '70's as US forces in Viet Nam were drawn down.
Why don't they understand:
1. It doesn't fit their ideology;
2. Many of them avoided any military service to our country; not all, but many;
3. They are a**holes. |
Well put and well received. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bergstrom79 Ensign
Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
here's GWB's Honorable Discharge (link) from his unit in Houston. Unless he robbed a lot of 7-11's while @ Harvard, the Dems have no case on his discharge. Note "Honorable" is denoted in the center of form, 3rd row.
http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/ANG22.gif
When the Dems reach on things like this, you know they're fighting with SPITBALLS. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LewWaters Admin
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 4042 Location: Washington State
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I laugh everytime I hear the left cry that what Kerry did 30 odd years ago doesn't matter today, then launch into a tirade of what Bush did 30 odd years ago _________________ Clark County Conservative |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|