|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
3rd gen Navy Lieutenant
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 227 Location: Gainesville, Fl.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:14 pm Post subject: More Bias from one who should know better |
|
|
More Bias from one who should know better:
This from Michael Dorf at findlaw:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20040901.html
This guy has an incredible education and yet still engages in subjective, unsubstantiated rhetoric. Does he think we're too dumb to notice his lack of objectivity? Selected quotes from the above URL follow:
But he has not specifically condemned the Swift Boat advertisements, which falsely claim that Kerry lied about the events that led to his combat medals.
That explains, to some extent, the actions of one non-PAC 527 organization--Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. They presumably felt free to sling mud at Senator Kerry without worrying that it would splash back on President Bush because they thought they could plausibly claim to be independent of the President's campaign.
There is, however, an alternative response to irresponsible advertisements by groups like Swift Boat Veterans for Truth…
So what action should be taken by Kerry supporters upset by the falsehoods presented by Swiftboat Veterans for Truth…
Please feel free to e-mail him at:
michael.dorf@law.columbia.edu
As always, should you be so inclined to give this fellow a piece of your mind, be objective, be moderate in your tone, spell check your e-mail, etc. Personally, I'm appalled that someone with the education he has could exhibit such an incredible lack of objectivity. You can read about his background at the following URL.
Michael Dorf CV
note: URL converted to hypertext _________________ Warm Regards,
Sean G. Smith,
RN, BSN, EMT-B, U.S. Navy, 1994 - 2003.
BS Biology, Business Administration, Nursing
The Deal with Life: Make decisions based on what you might gain, not on what you may lose.
!!!!!! LET THE WILD RUMPUS BEGIN !!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jim_nyc Seaman
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 198
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the heads up.
Just sent an email. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BC PO3
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 288 Location: Oklahoma City
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will probably be sending this idiot an e-mail later when I have more time, but for now he could have saved himself about 5 minutes of hard thinking be just stating what he really wanted to say.
I hate the Swift Boat Vets, I love moveon.idiots and the law says you can’t make moveon.idiots shut up. So nanny nanny boo boo.
Please _________________ Remember United Flight 93, "Are you guys ready? Let's roll."
Duty Honor Country |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jerry M Ensign
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:33 pm Post subject: My email to Dorf |
|
|
I sent Dorf the following email:
Michael,
How anyone with a brain could doubt what Kerry was up to in 1971 and what he is up to now is beyond my ability to comprehend. This guy has never been able to distinguish between legitimate, constructive criticism of US policy and giving aid and comfort to our enemies. When he perceives some political advantage to be gained, he has no problem with the latter. There will be great jubilation in Iraq among the terrorists if he were tragically to be elected. They know he has already announced that he will cut and run from a war he heavily supported before the fact but now says is a mistake for purely partisan political purposes. His incredible number of differing positions on Iraq are legendary. Before we became the dumbed down country that we are, he would have been laughed out of a Presidential race, Vietnam aside. This election is going to say more about us than about either candidate if Kerry were to be elected.
I am a retired Marine Corps officer who served two tours in Vietnam. I can assure you that for me and the vast majority of Vietnam veterans, Kerry's unfitness and unworthiness for command has nothing to do with being Republican or Democrat. We would feel just as strongly against him if he were a Republican. While the initial donors to the Swift boat vets were Republicans (just as most donors to Democrat 527's are Democrats), over 53,000 individuals have contributed almost $7 million. Has it occured to you or others like you that all the criticism of self proclaimed war hero Kerry is coming from Vietnam and other veterans including former POW's and Medal of Honor recipients while all the criticism of Bush's National Guard service is coming from Kerry and his surrogates in the media and Democratic party operatives. I'm not aware of any National Guard against Bush organizations or any other significant veterans groups against Bush. I'm also not sure what planet you have been on when Kerry had to back off some of his earlier claims like Christmas in Cambodia just to name one. I imagine you are an ACLU member or ally but have no problem with Kerry's only response to the Swiftboat ads other than name calling which was to try to censor the book "Unfit for Command" and threaten legal action aginst radio and TV stations if they ran the ad. The First Amendment doesn't matter to hypocrits like the ACLU or people like you when it is one of your cronies whose ox is being gored (no pun intended)
David Broder said it best when he mentioned a 2002 conversation with Kerry during which he said it would be politically advantageous to have both fought in Vietnam and opposed the war in Vietnam War. Broder went on to say that he thought people would see too much political calculation in such a bifurcated record. The Democratic Party spin is that he changes positions all the time because he is a complex, nuanced man when he is really a man with no integrity who blows in the wind (as illustrated in a recent ad) with what looks good politically at any point in time.
Kerry is the most flawed and dangerous candidate I have seen run for President in my 63 years and I have voted for both Democrats and Republicans including, believe it or not, Bill Clinton in 1992. I am a faculty member at a college in the Kansas City area. I am well acquainted with academic elitists like yourself whose ideology completely blocks out objective, intellectually honest thinking. Another name for this affliction is called prejudice which is a disease of the most stupid and ignorant among us whether it be against race, religion or just clear thinking about issues. You and other academic egg heads like you are among the more pathetic members of our society. We will know we are in big trouble if you become a majority. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmackto Rear Admiral
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 719 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sent:
Quote: | Dear Mr. Dorf,
I read your article "Why "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" and Other "527" Organizations Can't Be Silenced" and have found some inaccuracies in it.
My personal feelings are very pro-Swift and anti-Kerry, that aside, I only wish to bring your attention to facts that are incorrect rather than opinion.
First, in the sentence:
But he has not specifically condemned the Swift Boat advertisements, which falsely claim that Kerry lied about the events that led to his combat medals;
"falsely claim that Kerry lied about events that led to his combat medals." is incorrect. In fact Kerry's representatives have recanted original version of the events that led to his first purple heart and admitted it was in fact the result of a self-inflicted wound.
Also, Kerry's representatives have recanted several versions of the bronze star incident in which a mine hit one of the boats. In his campaign speech Kerry said all the boats left the scene when the 3 boat was hit and his boat stayed and rescued Rassmann. They now admit that in fact all the other boats stayed and aided the disabled boat while Kerry's boat alone fled the scene to return a short time later and pull Rassmann out of the water.
Additionally, Kerry has admitted he was not on a secret mission in Cambodia at Christmas time (and Nixon wasn't president at the time).
So, as you see, the Swift Boat claims were not false but in fact at least three of Kerry's claims have been admitted to be false as a direct result of the Swift Boat Veterans calling attention to them.
Your next inaccuracy is more an unfair representation because it isn't dealing in facts but in opinion and you are entitled to yours as I am to mine, however the sentence;
"That explains, to some extent, the actions of one non-PAC 527 organization--Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. They presumably felt free to sling mud at Senator Kerry without worrying that it would splash back on President Bush because they thought they could plausibly claim to be independent of the President's campaign."
leaves the reader believing that indeed the SBVT are not plausibly independent. The truth is the motives of SBVT are only to defeat John Kerry. Beyond that common cause the group is very politically diverse. John O'Neill, author of "Unfit For Command" is in fact a democrat who voted for Gore in 2000 and Ross Perot before that. He doesn't particularly like George Bush and has called him "an empty suit". The reason they are are plausibly independent is because they really are independent and have stated they will continue their ads even if Bush himself asked them to stop.
Next we have; "There is, however, an alternative response to irresponsible advertisements by groups like Swift Boat Veterans for Truth".
Here you leave the impression that the ads by SBVT have been misleading and false and therefore irresponsible however the first ad is the only one that can even be debated and the SBVT ad was proven to be true by admission of the Kerry campaign, however quietly and without media coverage. The second and subsequent ads are only restating historical documented facts and are therefore indisputably fact and therefore not irresponsible whether you like the message or not.
Finally, in the last paragraph you say; "So what action should be taken by Kerry supporters upset by the falsehoods presented by Swiftboat Veterans for Truth". Again we are dealing with the issue of the SBVT ads being factual. Not one fact in the ads they have run or in the book "Unfit For Command" has been proven to be false and therefore your use of the word falsehoods in regards to the SBVT group is inaccurate.
I suspect that you haven't read the book "Unfit For Command" and assumed the main stream media/Kerry camp position without having looked very deeply into it. Please do read the book and check the facts I've put forth and when you've done that please issue a correction.
I think that these veterans had their reputations unfair damaged due to public misconception during the Vietnam war and today they're reputations are being attacked again by people who usually are not truly informed calling them liars. They deserve an honest account of the facts. Please give them that regardless of your political leanings.
Regards,
Deborah Mack
http://www.pajamajournal.com |
_________________ Deborah
The FROZEN CHICKEN Journal
This is no time for ease and comfort. It is the time to dare and endure.
- Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmackto Rear Admiral
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 719 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ouch should have proof- read that before I sent it... _________________ Deborah
The FROZEN CHICKEN Journal
This is no time for ease and comfort. It is the time to dare and endure.
- Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmackto Rear Admiral
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 719 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BC wrote: |
I hate the Swift Boat Vets, I love moveon.idiots and the law says you can’t make moveon.idiots shut up. So nanny nanny boo boo.
Please |
lmao! That really does just get right to the heart of it. _________________ Deborah
The FROZEN CHICKEN Journal
This is no time for ease and comfort. It is the time to dare and endure.
- Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
3rd gen Navy Lieutenant
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 227 Location: Gainesville, Fl.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the e-mails guys! Professionalism and objectivity are the way.
Hopefully, some of our other readers will take the time to issue thoughtful and well reasoned replies. We can't change a closed mind, but we can serve notice that bias in public forums will not go unrebutted. Unfortunately, I couldn't find a point of contact for his supervisor/editor at findlaw. I am considering writing the Department Head / Chain of Command at his university. Will pass on e-mails as I find them. _________________ Warm Regards,
Sean G. Smith,
RN, BSN, EMT-B, U.S. Navy, 1994 - 2003.
BS Biology, Business Administration, Nursing
The Deal with Life: Make decisions based on what you might gain, not on what you may lose.
!!!!!! LET THE WILD RUMPUS BEGIN !!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
3rd gen Navy Lieutenant
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 227 Location: Gainesville, Fl.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dean of the Faculty of Law
David M. Schizer
Email dschiz@law.columbia.edu
Here is Dorf's "boss". I strongly encourage you to e-mail him, and suggest that Dorf's lack of objectivity is a negative reflection upon both Columbia in general and the school of Law in particular. As an employee of Columbia University, Dorf should temper his comments to avoid placing his department and institution in a bad light. _________________ Warm Regards,
Sean G. Smith,
RN, BSN, EMT-B, U.S. Navy, 1994 - 2003.
BS Biology, Business Administration, Nursing
The Deal with Life: Make decisions based on what you might gain, not on what you may lose.
!!!!!! LET THE WILD RUMPUS BEGIN !!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowy Commander
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 301 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's excellent Deborah. Since it will tax his mental abilities, I'll make mine simpler. I'll tell him that the best way to deny the SwiftVets their first amendment rights and stifle their criticism is simple. If you have the slightest shred of proof that they've lied, do what John O'Neill suggested, and sue him. _________________ It's downright brilliant the way he's reserving his devastating intellect to spring it on us at exactly the right moment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
truthserum Seaman
Joined: 12 Sep 2004 Posts: 190 Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's my contribution to the letter writing campaign. I hope it helps.
At least I feel better doing something rather than nothing.
From:
Date: 09/25/04 17:58:43
To: michael.dorf@law.columbia.edu
Subject: SwiftBoat Veterans for Truth
Why "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" and Other "527" Organizations Can't Be Silenced
By MICHAEL C. DORF
Dear Mr. Dorf,
Before you write an article, I believe you need to fact check. You are "assuming" that the SwiftBoat Vets are lying. I would like to know upon what basis you make that claim.
I am a 58 year old woman whose brother served "honorably" as a Marine in the Vietnam War. My Uncle also served in Vietnam. My brother made it home, my uncle did not.
I am old enough to remember what John Kerry said when he testified before the Senate about soldiers committing war crimes on a daily basis.
I am not one of the SwiftBoat vets nor is my brother, but we still to this day have "seared, seared" in our memories how my brother was treated when he returned from Vietnam. He was assailed with epithets of "baby killer", spit on, protestors trying to gang up on him. He never wanted to speak about Vietnam or admit he had even been there for years because of the baggage he was forced to carry over the words of John Kerry. My family received mean letters throwing insults at us and my brother for having served in Vietnam. This hurt all of us in many ways you could not even imagine.
I even had terrible thoughts that my uncle was the luckier one having been killed in Vietnam and not having to face what my brother had to face when he came home to America.
You can lie to those of us who are younger and do not have any knowledge or recollection of what took place because of Mr. Kerry's lies, but you cannot lie to those of us who lived through it. Perhaps you need to read the book "Unfit For Command" before you write any more articles on this subject with your bias poking through your words.
(edited to remove your personal information - you don't really know who is reading these boards. EJ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PatS Seaman Recruit
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 25 Location: Scottsdale,AZ
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can also find this information on 'findlaw.' I found it by following the links on armytimes.com.
Bush’s military records
3. http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/lit/election2004/docs.html
Saturday, Sept. 25, 2004
Pentagon Releases More Bush Service Documents WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon on Friday released more records on President Bush's Vietnam-era Air National Guard service but they provided no new substantive information. The 10 pages released included documents that had already been made public and were in most part cover letters or forms pertaining to Bush's appointment as 2nd Lt in the Texas Air National Guard.
DOCUMENTS
Many of these documents are in PDF format and can be viewed using Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Military Service Records of President George W. BushRecords of the President's military service in the Texas Air National Guard and other assignments during the years 1968 to 1973.
Military Records of First Lieutenant George W. Bush for National Guard Service Between 1972 and 1973:
Please note: The following four documents were originally obtained by CBS News and sent to FindLaw by the White House on September 8, 2004. However, CBS News issued a statement Monday, September 20, 2004, stating in part that the network "cannot prove the authenticity of documents used in a 60 Minutes story about President Bush's National Guard service and . . . airing the story was a 'mistake' that CBS regretted." · Aug. 1, 1972 Memo ordering Bush's suspension from the Texas Air National Guard's 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron. · May 4, 1972 Memo ordering Bush to report for his annual physical examination with the Texas Air National Guard by no later than May 14, 1972. · May 19, 1972 Memo to the file from Bush's commanding officer about a telephone call from Bush asking about how he "can get out of coming to drill," and suspecting that "he's...been talking to someone upstairs." · Aug. 18, 1973 ‘CYA’ Memo from Lt. Col. Killian suggesting that his superior officer, Col. Walter B. Staudt, was "pushing to sugar coat" Bush's officer evaluation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Poole Vice Admiral
Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 914 Location: America
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:19 am Post subject: More Bias... |
|
|
Here's what I sent to Schizer and Dorf:
Dear sir:
Michael C. Dorf is much too obvious in his support for Kerry. While I only attended a state university, I learned the Fourth Estate was established to keep people honestly advised of government actions, good and bad. His article published September 1, contains a number of biased comments, adjudged dishonest by many of us on the other side of the political fence. Dorf is perceived by many of us as the consummate snob, effete to a fault and unfair, bordering on prevarication. Columbia is one of our finest universities in law but also journalism. I believe Dorf has stained the university, particularly your fine school of journalism.
He seemed to blindly attack the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (Swiftees) but didn't seem to have a grasp of their message. This group in no way supports Bush and would be happy with anyone other than Kerry. If you would take the time to read Unfit for Command, I believe you also would conclude that "no jury in this country would fail to convict." Since they have been organized only since May, additional evidence is piling up every day. Please give it fair consideration, particularly since it may be read in one easy sitting. Many Swiftee vets are uneducated, overly direct, from all political persuasions (many are Democrats), but all seem to be honestly dedicated to one aim. That aim involves Bush only indirectly and has no connection at all to him. This quarrel is between the Swiftees and Kerry. Much of the quarrel would be defused if he would sign a Form 180, releasing his records so we may see what he's really been up to.
Thanks for your time, _________________ '58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nomorelies Vice Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 977 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Dear Dorf
In response to your article http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20040901.html
For the record, over 60 Vets who served with John F. Kerry claim that he lied or exaggerated about the events that led to his combat medals. If you are a legal scholar would the preponderance of eyewitness accounts that strongly disagree with John Kerry's version of the truth not even tweak your interes? Also, since John Kerry couldn't get to a typewriter fast enough to be the first to file afteraction reports could you not agree that Mr. Kerry had a keen interest in writing reports that sexed them up in his favor? In all fairness, do you think that a "contusion" which is a fancy word for a bruise is evidence of an injury grave enough to warrant a purple heart?
As a democrat you have every right to accept whichever side you choose regarding the integrity of Mr. Kerry's actions. If, sir you are married and if sir you are raising children what level of honesty and integrity would you expect from your children?
The REAL world sees through John Kerry. The REAL world can be found in the red states my friend. We are just plain, ordinary people who see through the fog and get the truth of matters implanted in our God-given gray matter uncluttered by pseudointellectual nuance.
|
Professionalism. Integrity.
I tried. I really tried. I put on my best pajamas and even brushed my hair for this one. Oops. I called him Dorf. _________________ Nomorelies Make a donation HERE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FredRum Lt.Jg.
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 118 Location: Reston, VA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|