SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ignore polls that don't use likely voters only

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
openfish24
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:53 am    Post subject: Ignore polls that don't use likely voters only Reply with quote

The msm is going to inundate us with biased polls.

Only likely voter polls matter.

If they polls they present don't filter the population they call to find the likely voters and then make sure the republican vs democratic population reflects current population figures and known registrations percentages the poll is garbage.

They are trying to elect the traitor

if i call everyone in Berkley california guess who will be ahead?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
neverforget
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Posts: 875

PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

>>if i call everyone in Berkley california guess who will be ahead?<<

Uh, Karl Marx or Mao Tse Tung?

How much do I get?
_________________
US Army Security Agency
1965-1971
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please stay on topic in Main Forum.

Thanks

Moving to Geedunk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got this very important informaton from
http://www.powerlineblog.com

Quote:
UPDATE: Reader Meg Kreikemeier points out that according to RealClearPolitics, Newsweek's most recent poll included 345 Republicans, 364 Democrats and 278 independents. This compares to Newsweek's published data for their most recent prior poll, which showed President Bush with a comfortable lead: 391 Republicans,
300 Democrats and 270 independents. Yes, if you drop 46 Republicans and add 64 Democrats, you will get considerably better results for the Democratic nominee. This is a good reminder of why poll data always need to be taken with a grain of salt, especially until you see the underlying data.

My point about the Newsweek poll, however, was not that it was right, but that it and others like it will be the basis for a media effort to give the Kerry campaign momentum going down the stretch.

_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
msindependent
Vice Admiral


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 891
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 3:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are desperate, of course they are going to spin the polling (they always have). Everybody get a grip, we have work to do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group