SwiftVets.com

[IamHG]

I know that the title of my post may seem extremely harsh, but I believe that it is a simple statement of fact. John Kerry, his rhetoric, his campaign, his entire carreer has been built upon the destruction of american values and the aid and comfort to our enemies.

From his assistance of the Viet Cong, to the Sandanistas, to the encouragement of the terrorist murderers that attack our soldiers and citizens, he is an opportunistic anti american demagogue.

I write this as a registered independant who can no longer consider himself truely independant. John Kerry has made the democratic party into a wholly unacceptable alternative.

John Kerry is the true standardbearer of the new "Micheal Moore" wing of the democratic party. I have nothing but contempt and disgust for what the party has become. I do not mean that to attack all democrats, however I would encourage any registered democrat to either protest from the inside, or get out. The party of John Kerry and Micheal Moore has become the enemy of America.
_________________
<insert pithy signature here>

[Tom Poole]

Any time you good Democrats want to seize your party, we'll help you with as much energy as we've used to fight the punk of privilege. I'd really like a return to the days when it was difficult to decide which party to support. Now, it's too easy to decide but too scary to contemplate losing.
_________________
'58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2

[fortdixlover]

[cipher]

The sad, sad truth is that if Osama bin Laden was running as the democrat candidate, 1/3 of the country would vote for him, because he's not Bush.

bin Laden would carry New York, California, Massachusetts, and DC. There's a good chance he'd carry Illinois, too.

He'd have the support of ABC, CBS and NBC. The NYT and WaPo would be extoling his contributions to society. Carville and Begala would be braying on Sundays. Oprah would have tearful interviews, and when he came on the morning shows, all you'd see of Katy Couric is her eyes. For three solid days.

The book shelves would be filled with titles like "9/11: Catharsis or Crisis?", "Afghanistan: Did we do the Right Thing?"

Michael Moore would be producing "Bombing for Tora Bora", and the Dixie Chicks would be singing in Farsi.

Grade school teachers would be fired for not having a picture of bin Laden beside the President of the United States. The ACLU would be up in arms about bin Laden having his Fourth Amendment Rights violated.

Still and all, I think I'd rather have bin Laden running than Kerry.

At least he's consistent.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92

[lrb111]

[IamHG]

I was talking to my wife after getting that post off of my chest... and I was looking for a possible silver lining if Kerry wins. I said; "Well, at least a Kerry win would greatly decrease the likelyhood of a Hillary presidency."

Then I realised that I would actually [greatly] prefer Hillary to a Kerry presidency, and that is scary.
_________________
<insert pithy signature here>

[LewWaters]

[Chuck54]

Iamhg, when I saw the title of your thread I wanted to post a "Duh" so big it wouldn't even fit in my house let alone the computer screen.

But I have known the true kerry since last year, when I started looking into his history, and he has only gotten worse since then. You are just now learning of what a slimeball he is. Its quite a shock isn't it, but even more shocking, are the number of people that are willing to vote for him, even fully aware of his shameful, traitorous history. Its unfathomable to me but its reality.
_________________
"And no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often, than the two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry"

Zell Miller

[srmorton]

I still wonder if Bill and Hillary are planning some sort of "October
suprise" if it should begin to look like Kerry is definitely going to
win. I KNOW they do not want Hillary to have to run against an
Democratic incumbent in 2008 - unless they think he will be such
a bad president that he would not prevail against a challenge from
within his own party.
_________________
Susan R. Morton

[IamHG]

[joeshero]

I have been so amazed how STRONG ande PASSIONATELY the liberals and Kerry to defend Saddam Hussein. Democrats may as well pick Saddam as their VP candidate.

Kerry is just a plastic person. He will even change the color of his face. This man is absolutely pathetic.
_________________
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

[SangRun Hunter]

I agree with all the points being made in this thread.

Every night I'm in shock at how half of my country thinks or is being duped.

Every night I see the Liberal talking heads saying the same canned speech about how Bush lied to all of us.

I fear for my country and my family and with the violence that has started against Bush campaign headquarters and other stuff I wonder what is going to happen eitehr way on Nov 2.

If Bush wins does the extreme left goes nuts a mount a coup? If Kerry wins will he sign an executive order to gag us all on the internet using some pretense about the war and Patriot act. Will the right wing types sit still if Kerry is elected?

It's crazy to even have these thoughts running through ones head.
_________________
Mad as Hell!

[Me#1You#10]

[swing votr]

Registered Democrat here, and I am always doing my best to try and change my party for the better. To the dismay of some of you, however, I am not trying to make my part more conservitive, nor am I trying make it 'socialist' (as we are so often accused of being on this sight). The problem as I see it, is that too few politicians put foreward their opinions on matters because it will upset their corporate donors. Its a sad day when we have oil execs determining our energy policy, former insurance company employees determining our nations health care, and most decisions are made not for the benefit of the people, but for the benefit of the donors to politicians.
My vision of a democratic party is where the source of our advertising comes from its members, not corporations. Where the decisions are made based on whats best for the people, and not the businesses. A persons morals are based upon the way he was brought up, and not which public interest group got to him first.
John K., and our president for that matter, represent the problems, and not the solutions. The last election, (and probably this coming election) I voted for Nader. Not because I am a tree huggin hippy, or a commie socialist and not because I agree with his morals, but because I am fed up with my party. I feel I can send a message, by simply voting my conscience, to my party that says, "HEY, all you have to do is get back to the PEOPLE. Represent us, and you have our vote. In the end, while a CEO may donate 15,000,000, he still only has one vote. And while I have only a few dollars to donate, my vote counts the same.
_________________
"I already don't miss it," he said of Washington. Asked to elaborate, he replied: "You know that great feeling you get when you stop banging your head against a wall?"

[Me#1You#10]

As this thread has political overtones, I am moving it to the Geedunk Forum.

We ask ALL our forum members to please keep in mind that the SVPT campaign is attempting to reach those of ALL political persuasions and partisan rhetoric is neither encouraged or helpful to, what should be, our collective goal.

Thanks in advance for your understanding and consideration for the purpose of this forum.

Admin