|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Inatizzy Former Member
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Posts: 439
|
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kerry's campaign slogan should be "we are the Borg, you will be assimilated".
Heck yeah Communism and Socialism are alive and well.....it's called the Democratic Party. A rose by any other name and all that happy crappy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
P. Aaron Commander
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 322 Location: the grassy knoll
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
A few more thoughts about communism: The terrorists are communist/collectivist in their own way but the method is similar:
A cabal enforcing their law by the use of force and terror to bend others to their will, and/or to mute opposition enough that it shrinks away. The terrorist still consumes the effort of others without compensation. Anything of intrinsic value eventually turns into "loot". Like a treasure fought over by hordes of times past. While the creative production of a free man is inhibited, for fear that the creativity itself becomes a life-sentence of slavery for the creator.
This parallels many dictatorships in the world today; Iran, North Korea, and Zimbabuwe(sp?) are the few that instantly come to mind.
Why would a man today work to create value, knowing that his captors and/or tormentors would simply rob him of anything value, and man would not be rewarded for his effort to be creative? But in fact be punished.
The end result is creation stops. Whether it be a new medical breakthrough, or a better mousetrap. Thus, Zimbabuwe(sp?) can no longer feed itself and sell its surplus and N. Korea starves for similar reasons. Rather than developing the creativity of an "open market", most dictatorships have had to steal technologies and science in an attempt to keep parity with its rivals. _________________ A willing tool of the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" since 1981. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ocsparky101 PO1
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 479 Location: Allen Park. Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
All I can tell you for sure is that the Web Site CPUSA wich is the communist party in the USA said on their site that they were not running a canidate this year because they did not want to take away from the canidate they want to see elected. Now of course they also have the ten reasons not to vote for George Bush so I assume they are not supporting Bush. They did not want to name thieir favorite canidate though because they did not want to cost him votes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ocsparky101 PO1
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 479 Location: Allen Park. Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
All I can tell you for sure is that the Web Site CPUSA wich is the communist party in the USA said on their site that they were not running a canidate this year because they did not want to take away from the canidate they want to see elected. Now of course they also have the ten reasons not to vote for George Bush so I assume they are not supporting Bush. They did not want to name thieir favorite canidate though because they did not want to cost him votes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Michmaddave Ensign
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that the insidious nature of, and seduction of communism can be best illustrated by the Ayn Rand 1959 book "Atlas Shrugged". (Ironically for me, the year I was born). In it is the socialistic arguments in the fictional tale of a Railroad Magnate who is up against the socialists who want to, unknown to them, drive her and her railroad under "for the people". The major fault of Communism, being the failure to account for human nature, and for the necessary self interest trait for self preservation and individual freedom, is best shown in this work which was written by a Russian Immigrant Rand herself. It is a long book, over 1100 pages, and starts out slowly, but it is the only book I have ever read where I have found myself yelling out loud in agreement. I highly recommend. _________________ To model our political system upon speculations of lasting tranquility, is to calculate on the weaker springs of the human character.
---Alexander Hamilton
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
Last edited by Michmaddave on Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:36 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadowy Commander
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 301 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've read that our present education system was designed by socialists at around the turn of the century. And I don't think it teaches kids what socialism really is. They make it sound like a wonderful thing. It's not hard to be seduced, if you are completely naive about human nature and can imagine that everyone would be concerned about the collective well being above their own interests.
I recommend David Horowitz's book Left Illusions. He was a leftist who came to his senses. Now he's their worst nightmare. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Michmaddave Ensign
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
"the vision of the anointed" by Horowitz is also excellent. _________________ To model our political system upon speculations of lasting tranquility, is to calculate on the weaker springs of the human character.
---Alexander Hamilton
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dusty Admiral
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 1264 Location: East Texas
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Democrats are going to have to rename their party if they don't have a house cleaning. Commiecrats would fit nicely if they continue to embrace the communists ideals as they so surely are today.
I've asked this before. Who's going to step up and be our Joe McCarthy today. There is a nest of communist sympathizers or ourtright card carrying members in our congress right now. By their votes over the last 40 yrs. they have identified themselves.
All that's required is to examine the voting records of all the Senators and Reps. The ones that consitantly vote against America at every turn in favor of Communist regimes or dictatorships should be purged from the halls of congress. Simple as that.
Maybe then we would have a chance of turning around the socialist trends we have been having to endure the results of for the last 30 yrs.
Without their power base in congress, I believe the MSM would be hard pressed to continue thier business of subverting the country. Although they would try.
We have a hard fight ahead of us in this respect folks. And we'd better start doing something about it or we will wake up conquered one bright, dark sunny morning.
Dusty |
|
Back to top |
|
|
margie Seaman
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you know the communist party is not running a candadate this year, but is supporting Kerry? First time from my understanding. I wrote someone in MI regarding this who is thinking of voting for Kerry....they replied, that may have been important in the 70ies, but has no bearing today???? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
P. Aaron Commander
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 322 Location: the grassy knoll
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joe McCarthy was not destroyed because he was delusional. Joe McCarthy was destroyed because he was right.
What's funny is that if you really put "the McCarthy era" into context, most of what they say anti-communists where doing ie: the Hollywood Blacklists, HUAC, The 'Red Scare" all happened before McCarthy was ever sworn into the Senate.
Lazy historians just cobble the public anti-communist movement together in order to have enough material to fill an hour on PBS. Rarely, if ever has there ever been an examination of what McCarthy was actually doing.
McCarthy was simply one of many senators investigating (in closed session) a list of names of government employees that where suspected of being members of the American communist party. The list was developed through investigations by the FBI. Many were simply investigated and cleared, others where found GUILTY and dismissed quietly. Those sessions where not made public until democrats voted to make them public so they could filibuster and show-boat for the press and cameras. The reason; many of the goverment employees and staffers with communist ties worked for democrats. _________________ A willing tool of the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" since 1981. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mona Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 77 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
P. Aaron wrote: | Joe McCarthy was not destroyed because he was delusional. Joe McCarthy was destroyed because he was right.
What's funny is that if you really put "the McCarthy era" into context, most of what they say anti-communists where doing ie: the Hollywood Blacklists, HUAC, The 'Red Scare" all happened before McCarthy was ever sworn into the Senate.
Lazy historians just cobble the public anti-communist movement together in order to have enough material to fill an hour on PBS. Rarely, if ever has there ever been an examination of what McCarthy was actually doing.
McCarthy was simply one of many senators investigating (in closed session) a list of names of government employees that where suspected of being members of the American communist party. The list was developed through investigations by the FBI. Many were simply investigated and cleared, others where found GUILTY and dismissed quietly. Those sessions where not made public until democrats voted to make them public so they could filibuster and show-boat for the press and cameras. The reason; many of the goverment employees and staffers with communist ties worked for democrats. |
As one who has an intense interest in the history of Communism in America, I, too, have repeatedly seen then/now similarities re: the left's reaction to Bush, the Swiftees, the fabricated CBS memos & etc. Whittaker Chambers, as well as ex-communists and informers Elizabeth Bentley and Louis Budenz, were demonized by the "best people"; they were accused of alcoholism, mental illness, & of simply being liars. Their testimony was pored over to find any inconsistencies, and no matter how trivial, these were highly touted. As history proved Chambers et al. to have been truthful, the left became quite petulant, with a few holdouts still clinging to ridiculous conspiracy theories rather than face the reality that the U.S. govt was at one time heavily infiltrated with Ivy-League-degreed communist spies. Hiss was one, and so was Harry Dexter White, and many others on the "progressive" side.
Communism as an ideology is dead, but anti-Americanism remains a vital force for the left. For that reason, while it is now generally "ok" to concede there were some spies, it is still a great faux pas to be anti-communist; anti-anti-communism remains alive. It is not allowed to criticize Kerry for giving aid and comfort to the Communist enemy -- that is so...unhip.
The special pleading and defense of Kerry's treasonous trips to Paris, the defense of his outrageous "war crimes" slander, these come from the same media and intellectual enclaves that would not believe that the squat, dissheveld Chambers could possibly be telling the truth about the urbane New Dealer and UN architecht, Alger Hiss. It was simply unthinkable, and when Chambers' monumental biography, Witness, was published, many leftists actively sought to crush its influence through vicious reviews and distortions. The reaction to the Swiftees and UfC have been similar.
As with the Rosenbergs, the attitude about Kerry is that he is innocent even if he was guilty. For he was against America, and for the "progressives." That is all that matters.
That all said, I strongly disagree that Joseph McCarthy is someone "we" should hold out for admiration. Chambers himself became very wary of McCarthy's demagogic and dishonest tactics, and refused to support him in relatively short order. Indeed, he initially would not join the staff of the new National Review in large part because he felt it was an enormous mistake for the right to align itself with McCarthy as THE voice of anti-communism. I am convinced Chambers was right. (Read Sam Tanenhaus' bio of Chambers to get the full scoop on what so bothered Chambers about McCarthy.) Ann Coulter gives amusing voice, but for gravitas and deep analysis of anti-communism and McCarthy, I would not recommend her. _________________ --Mona-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anker-Klanker Admiral
Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Posts: 1033 Location: Richardson, TX
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Communism as an ideology is dead, but anti-Americanism remains a vital force for the left |
That's the key, insightful statement of this thread (if you ask me). America stands for Democracy, i.e., the notion that we can all think, are free, and are valued members of society (this can probably be better said).
The "ism" forms of government (including Islam-sim) all have a common thread: that someone of the elite class is better at governing and thinking on behalf of everyone else. It's no coincidence that the elite class see this as the ticket to power over the masses (poor unthinking, unwashed wretches that they are).
If the use of "Communism" or "Socialism" make you uncomfortable in today's liberally-inspired PC climate, then go back for historical example to Europe prior to the Protestant Reformation where the nobility and the Catholic Church (before someone gets offended, I'm not talking about the Catholic Church of today) conspired to repress the common man. It was exactly the same mechanism. It's an old idea, and one that keeps re-surfacing, just under different names.
America, and Democracy, really is a gift to mankind! Is it any wonder that the American ideal, which is no longer just an "experiment," is being resisted so fiercely by all the "isms" today, and most notably by the radical Islamists?
But remember that whatever you call it, the real impetus behind anti-AmericanISM and anti-DemocracyISM is the elitists goal to consolidate power among a chosen few. Many people seem to be surprised that this ideology war has been going on in this country since our country was founded.
Alexander Hamilton (who was not one of my heroes, but who, in all fairness, did contribute much to the establishing some of the basic structures America) was an Elitist. Just read in-depth histories of the real debates that were going on between him and Thomas Jefferson that resulted in The Federalist Papers to get at this revelation.
Andrew Jackson, despite his crudeness and rough-cut ways, led another internal revolution against the Elitists who had by-and-large gained power before Jackson's election as President.
There have been other, less-easily identified, "battles" since. And with each resurgence of the Elitists there has been an expressed desire to re-establish old dependency ties (or at least to back-off on our fierce independence) with Europe.
Added: I got so caught up in getting my thoughts and feelings down, I really forgot the punch-line(s):
* You really don't have to call this phenomenon "Communism" if that makes you uncomfortable. But it's the same thing. The same power-grabbing and manipulating strategies existed before Communism.
* Any of this sound familiar when you listen to Kerry?
Last edited by Anker-Klanker on Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rurik PO3
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 251 Location: Daschle-cleansed Free South Dakota
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First, anyone who knows anything about the Soviet system and the KGB, knows immediately that someone who was able to get a visa and visit Moscow on the spur of the moment in 1969, and then just travels around all by himself is definitely recruited and controlled. if anyone wishes further explanation, I'll do the dance for you.
Second. Everyone checking this forum really wants to read Charles McCarry's novel, "Lucky Bastard", Random House, 1998. Some thiings can better be told through a thinly ficitonalized account. The novel is the story of a poor but ambitious Ohio politician with a zipper problem. It is a hoot combined with a grimace. You owe it to yourself.
Consider the forumla: "An agent of a no-longer-existing power."
_________________ Hating John Kerry continuously since 1971.
Essayons!
Fight Build and Destroy
Last edited by Rurik on Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:43 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nccjones Ensign
Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 62 Location: Virginia Beach
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I've read that our present education system was designed by socialists at around the turn of the century |
Why do you think we have "Social Studies"? Here is an article that was done in September 2001 that tells us why we have socialism in our Public Schools...
http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/2001/sept01/socialism.shtml
(I hope I posted this correctly, it's the first time I posted a URL on this site.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mona Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 77 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | But remember that whatever you call it, the real impetus behind anti-AmericanISM and anti-DemocracyISM is the elitists goal to consolidate power among a chosen few. Many people seem to be surprised that this ideology war has been going on in this country since our country was founded.
|
Exactly. And anti-Americanism -- which remains vital even after its sister of Marxist enthusiasm has been undermined by the march of time -- is what explains the otherwise incomprehensible spectacle of leftist and feminists not wishing to fight or condemn a murderous web of religious fanatics who hate women, homosexuals and the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Indeed, many on the left extol aspects of Islamic culture that not one of them would actually wish to live under. Some of the same people get all tied up in outraged knots at every extreme utterance of, say, Pat Robertson, but give misogynistic Muslims a pass.
Why? Because jihadists despise the U.S. We are the Great Satan, and that sentiment the heirs of the Hiss/Rosenberg defenders and haters of Chambers can completely identify with. The Islamic fanatics want us destroyed, and so have merit. A few leftists did, after all, utter that 9/11 was "chickens coming home to roost."
Very disturbing phenomenon. But true, and is why those on the principled left, such as Christopher Hitchens, have been jumping ship. _________________ --Mona-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|