|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Hesiod Former Member
Joined: 08 May 2004 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 2:16 pm Post subject: THE JOHN KERRY'S OF THIS GENERATION |
|
|
"The two military intelligence soldiers, assigned interrogation duties at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, were young, relatively new to the Army and had only one day of training on how to pry information from high-value prisoners.
But almost immediately on their arrival in Iraq, say the two members of the 205th Military Intelligence Brigade, they recognized that what was happening around them was wrong, morally and legally.
They said in interviews Friday and yesterday that the abuses were not caused by a handful of rogue soldiers poorly supervised and lacking morals but resulted from failures that went beyond the low-ranking military police charged with abuse.
The beatings, the two soldiers said, were meted out with the full knowledge of intelligence interrogators, who let military police know which prisoners were cooperating with them and which were not.
"I was told, 'Don't worry about it - they probably deserved it,'" one of the soldiers said in an interview, referring to complaints he made while trying to persuade the Army to investigate. "I was appalled."
The two soldiers are the first from a military intelligence unit known to speak publicly about what happened at Abu Ghraib, and they are the first from such a unit to contend publicly that some interrogators were complicit in the abuses. The soldiers stressed that not all interrogators were involved.
The soldiers were interviewed together Friday in person and then separately yesterday by telephone. They said they had alerted superiors at Abu Ghraib and the Army's Criminal Investigations Division by November or early December of prisoners being beaten, stripped naked and paraded in front of other inmates."
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/iraq/bal-te.guard09may09,0,2917335,print.story?coll=bal-home-headlines
God help them if they ever decide to run for office. Some of their "fellow veterans" might decide to smear them and accuse them of slander. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Greenhat LCDR
Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 405
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 2:21 pm Post subject: Re: THE JOHN KERRY'S OF THIS GENERATION |
|
|
Hesiod wrote: | They said they had alerted superiors at Abu Ghraib and the Army's Criminal Investigations Division by November or early December of prisoners being beaten, stripped naked and paraded in front of other inmates. |
Seems you missed this. Kerry never reported seeing or taking part in warcrimes to his chain of command or to the Navy's CID. Not once. He waited until he could be on a national stage and make the claims to Congress. Thing is, as a Naval Officer, it was his duty and legal obligation to report any such crimes. These soldiers did their duty. John F. Kerry did not. _________________ De Oppresso Liber |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hesiod Former Member
Joined: 08 May 2004 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 2:26 pm Post subject: Re: THE JOHN KERRY'S OF THIS GENERATION |
|
|
Greenhat wrote: | Hesiod wrote: | They said they had alerted superiors at Abu Ghraib and the Army's Criminal Investigations Division by November or early December of prisoners being beaten, stripped naked and paraded in front of other inmates. |
Seems you missed this. Kerry never reported seeing or taking part in warcrimes to his chain of command or to the Navy's CID. Not once. He waited until he could be on a national stage and make the claims to Congress. Thing is, as a Naval Officer, it was his duty and legal obligation to report any such crimes. These soldiers did their duty. John F. Kerry did not. |
Nope. According to Swifty Vets, Kerry was "insubordinate" because he complained about useless and senseless tactics like Free Fire Zones.
So, either he was insubordinate for complaining about war crimes, or he kept his mouth shut.
Which is it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Montana Lt.Jg.
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 138 Location: Montana
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice try Hesiod.
You´re comparing soldiers witnessing first-hand incidents
in Iraq, to John Kerry slandering thousands with sweeping
statements based on what other radicals in Washington DC
were saying at the time.
How many atrocities did John Kerry personally
observe in Vietnam? For the ones he (or you) can come up
with, why, as an OIC of his Swift Boat, did he not report
these atrocities, as he was required to, including the ones he admitted to himself (on Meet the Press)?
I could go on, but your analogy doesn´t wash with this veteran.
Montana |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Greenhat LCDR
Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 405
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 2:36 pm Post subject: Re: THE JOHN KERRY'S OF THIS GENERATION |
|
|
Hesiod wrote: |
Nope. According to Swifty Vets, Kerry was "insubordinate" because he complained about useless and senseless tactics like Free Fire Zones.
So, either he was insubordinate for complaining about war crimes, or he kept his mouth shut. |
Free fire zones aren't war crimes. Read FM27-10. And while you are at it, provide some proof of your claims that Kerry made such complaints. That is not what his Commanders have stated. _________________ De Oppresso Liber |
|
Back to top |
|
|
95 bxl Seaman
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 6:04 pm Post subject: Re: THE JOHN KERRY'S OF THIS GENERATION |
|
|
Hesiod wrote: | Greenhat wrote: | Hesiod wrote: | They said they had alerted superiors at Abu Ghraib and the Army's Criminal Investigations Division by November or early December of prisoners being beaten, stripped naked and paraded in front of other inmates. |
Seems you missed this. Kerry never reported seeing or taking part in warcrimes to his chain of command or to the Navy's CID. Not once. He waited until he could be on a national stage and make the claims to Congress. Thing is, as a Naval Officer, it was his duty and legal obligation to report any such crimes. These soldiers did their duty. John F. Kerry did not. |
Nope. According to Swifty Vets, Kerry was "insubordinate" because he complained about useless and senseless tactics like Free Fire Zones. |
You, no doubt, base your conclusion on tactics from your vast repitore of military experience and knowledge, right?
Hesiod wrote: |
So, either he was insubordinate for complaining about war crimes, or he kept his mouth shut.
Which is it? |
I'm stunned that you leftists would be supporting a self-professed war criminal.
His blanket assertions concerning our people in the RVN was, like most of his pronouncements, leftist self-serving crap.
Kerry, unfortunately, was an officer in the military. As an officer, his duty (something you have no clue about) is clear. That he cowardly disregarded his duty speaks for itself. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sparky Former Member
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 546
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
deleted (see below)
Last edited by sparky on Sun May 09, 2004 9:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sparky Former Member
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 546
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hesiod, you bring up some really good points. And like atrocities committed during Vietnam, rightwingers just want a public kept ignorant.
Quote: | The two military intelligence soldiers, assigned interrogation duties at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, were young, relatively new to the Army and had only one day of training on how to pry information from high-value prisoners.
But almost immediately on their arrival in Iraq, say the two members of the 205th Military Intelligence Brigade, they recognized that what was happening around them was wrong, morally and legally.
They said in interviews Friday and yesterday that the abuses were not caused by a handful of rogue soldiers poorly supervised and lacking morals but resulted from failures that went beyond the low-ranking military police charged with abuse.
The beatings, the two soldiers said, were meted out with the full knowledge of intelligence interrogators, who let military police know which prisoners were cooperating with them and which were not. |
Some big question for you defenders or deniers of atrocities:
Can the US win a war without resorting to human rights abuses? Do we have to defile our ideals in order to promote them? Are individuals who speak out against war crimes always traitors?
Hesiod, you made a good point:
Quote: | Nope. According to Swifty Vets, Kerry was "insubordinate" because he complained about useless and senseless tactics like Free Fire Zones. |
I think that if people like Kerry had been listened to, we probably would have won the war there. Instead, using civilians as target practice and stringing their ears into necklaces just strengthened the resolve and recruitment of the Viet Cong.
Sounds eerily similar to Iraq today. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sparky Former Member
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 546
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Greenhat LCDR
Joined: 09 May 2004 Posts: 405
|
Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sparky wrote: |
Can the US win a war without resorting to human rights abuses? |
We have.
Quote: | I think that if people like Kerry had been listened to, we probably would have won the war there. Instead, using civilians as target practice and stringing their ears into necklaces just strengthened the resolve and recruitment of the Viet Cong. |
I suggest you do some research in the archives of Hanoi. Your opinion is at odds with that of the Vietnamese Generals. We had won the war. Then Kerry, Fonda, etc. began their campaigns and strengthened the resolve of the North Vietnamese (the VC effectively ended as an organization during Tet '68 ). _________________ De Oppresso Liber |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|