|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Wolfgang Ensign
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 9:18 pm Post subject: Excellent WSJ Online article: Kerry's Lost Opportunity |
|
|
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110005524
Kerry's Lost Opportunity
He could have healed the wounds of Vietnam. Instead, he tried to exploit them.
BY HERMAN JACOBS
Thursday, August 26, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT
Here's the best excerpt, I think:
Quote: | How can it possibly be that his actions 30 years ago, which Mr. Kerry himself described as shameful war crimes, are now so undeniably honorable that no one is allowed to question Mr. Kerry's account of those actions, not even the very men whom Mr. Kerry accused of committing war crimes?
Why must we treat it as acceptable for John Kerry to have demeaned the honor of thousands of his former comrades in 1971 while those men were at that very moment still in Vietnam's swamps and jungles fighting for their lives, but now, when Mr. Kerry himself is well out of harm's way sleeping comfortably every night on the cushion of billions his wife inherited from her dead Republican husband, it's politically incorrect for the men Mr. Kerry called war criminals to raise a question about his antiwar activities?
Why are we are not permitted to consider the possibility, supported by the testimony of credible witnesses, that a man who said he was ashamed to have been involved in war crimes against innocent civilians would not have taken advantage of a few very minor scrapes to extricate himself from further participation in activities he considered to be shameful war crimes?
Why is that in 1971 it was patriotic dissent for John Kerry to tell young men to avoid going to Vietnam (because it was dishonorable), but now an official web site of Mr. Kerry's Democratic Party suggests it was dishonorable for George W. Bush not to go to Vietnam that same year? Yes, the official DNC web site throws down the gauntlet with the statement: "Kerry vs. Bush: Compare their service." To help us make that comparison, the Democrats have for years questioned every last detail about Mr. Bush's National Guard record. But as soon as anyone points out the contradictions in Mr. Kerry's actions during the Vietnam era, Mr. Kerry hides behind his tiny "band of brothers" and wraps himself in the flag with neopatriotic statements like this:
We call her Old Glory. The stars and stripes forever. I fought under that flag, as did so many of those people here tonight and all across our country. That flag flew from the gun turret right behind my head. It was shot through and through and tattered, but it never ceased to wave in the wind. It draped the caskets of men I served with and friends I grew up with.
Is that the same Old Glory displayed in so mocking a fashion on the cover of Mr. Kerry's antiwar book, "The New Soldier"? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kate Admin
Joined: 14 May 2004 Posts: 1891 Location: Upstate, New York
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is that the same Old Glory displayed in so mocking a fashion on the cover of Mr. Kerry's antiwar book, "The New Soldier"?
great artical
I heard a blurb from Kerry speech on the radio driving home from work. .. he swore everything about his service was backed up by Navy records and was the God's honest truth
sad, wonder if in his mind he has actually convinced himself of that. He spouts off about the truth, but wont release the records _________________ .
one of..... We The People |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Billman Lt.Jg.
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 126 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"I am not a crook..." _________________ -- Bill in Seattle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|