View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Doc Jerry Commander
Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 11:16 pm Post subject: Debate moderators: why are liberals choses? |
|
|
The question I have is why has the president's team allowed such Left wing moderators. First there was Jim Lehrer. This evening it's Gwen Fill. Her background: PBS, NY Times, NBC news. What's wrong with that picture? We can't even get moderate moderators.
Medics, we're there when you need us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wednesdaychild PO3
Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 276
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wish I knew. It is bad when almost the entire press is against us. They can do so much harm. The average voter just does not involve themselves in the political process like we are. Hey at least Dick Cheney won the coin toss this time.
One problem I see is we, the republicans, conservatives, etc, have a thing about playing fair and with honor.. It seems that most of us were raised where morals and values and character meant something, and the importance of being a lady or gentleman are important. Sadly, we are dealing with people for whom none of this is important. They just want to win and how they do it is not relvant. so what are we going to do. let them win? The average liberal's view is : it's only wrong if u get caught.
Guys, seriously, someone in the Bush camp better take the gloves off. I'm praying for Bush too, but the good guys do not always win. Now that we all know to what lengths they will go to win this election, do we get in the mud with them or take the high road? Can we live with Skerry for 4 maybe 8 yrs? _________________ "...for the good of believing in life after birth..."
Jim Steinman |
|
Back to top |
|
|
highwayman Seaman Recruit
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 43 Location: oregon
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 11:43 pm Post subject: moderators? |
|
|
because if they had rush, bill o'riley or any of the other conservitives the liberals would, to say the least, would stroke out..
basicaly what they work on is the lack of information and the emotions of the general population, and now there is no way the libs and even some of the conservitives, will allow any real truth to come out in the questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Redleg Lt.Jg.
Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Posts: 113 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think in the media circles, Lehrer and Fill are regarded a moderates. I do watch them daily on PBS and they ask queations and follow up with another questions without giving their own opinions. What I like about PBS News shows are they do report the news and stick with the issues without the usual attempt to entertain by controversy.
I only know Lehrer and Fill from PBS and they seem straight to me. _________________ FIRE MISSION: Kerry campaign in line of sight. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twicearound PO2
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 362 Location: San Antonio
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
PBS was involed in giving their donor list to the dems in the 2000 election. There president or vice, something like that had to resign and Clinton call lehrer their monitor. This about says it all. The head of the debate comission is a moderate Republican (makes you wonder) My Hubby has seen Gwen on MSM and she seemed moderate to conservative. Tonight will tell. _________________ twicearound |
|
Back to top |
|
|
docford Lt.Jg.
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Bush deliberately avoided asking for any conservative moderators. From an argument standpoint, it is much easier to get your point across when responding to a slanted or biased question. _________________ Doc Ford
HMC (SW) USN |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tobette Lt.Jg.
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 124 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought Cheney was absolutely brilliant! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wednesdaychild PO3
Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 276
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
those 3 grumpy old guys at fox and one woman are always wrong on their spin. that was a hot debate and they can't even see it. the mod was biased and it showed.
dick cheney was brilliant and edwards need to find a new job
lol _________________ "...for the good of believing in life after birth..."
Jim Steinman |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joeshero Commander
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 321 Location: Midwest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
KERRY'S ECONOMIC PLAN
MARRY WEALTH
SUE THE RICH
That's very true!!! _________________ All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
joeshero wrote: | KERRY'S ECONOMIC PLAN
MARRY WEALTH
SUE THE RICH
That's very true!!! |
They should use Brit Humme, but he is too fair and balanced for the dems. Pathetic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
highwayman Seaman Recruit
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 43 Location: oregon
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KERRY'S ECONOMIC PLAN
MARRY WEALTH
SUE THE RICH
$%&! the poll, this damned cantraption pissed me off!! what do you think of this jack off??
elect him prez??I VOTE!!!
you think carter had dead lock!! you will HAVE THE ENTIRE WORLD DECIDING HOW MUCH TOILET PAPER TO USE WHEN YOU WHIPE YOUR ASS IF KERRY IS ELECTED!! in my opinion somebody should have put a bullit into that draft dodging clinton!! in my opinion kerry is dick waste!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|