SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Untied Nations rejects concept of US sovereignty
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Schadow
Vice Admiral


Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Huntsville, Alabama

PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 9:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Untied Nations rejects concept of US sovereignty Reply with quote

coldwarvet wrote:

How do you define imminent threat? What do you call jihad indoctrinated combatants that steal our air planes and then crash them into our buildings killing over 3000 of our citizens? I sincerely believe if these jihad indoctrinated combatants were not so pre occupied with keeping a democracy out of the heart of the terrorist world we would have buried tens if not hundreds of thousands of Americans on the home land by now. These jihad terrorists are just looking for a way to get their reward of eternal virgins by killing infidels.


Imminent threat is usually defined as 'the attack has begun'. The ICBM has been launched. The truckload of explosives is on the streets, heading for the building. The plane's cockpit has been commandeered. The train with the armed container is approaching city-center, etc., etc.

George Bush never proclaimed imminent threat when arguing for preemptive war. Instead, he advocated preemption before a threat became imminent - an eminently sensible approach.

I can see it now. We think an attack may be imminent. Notify the UN Security Council. All the "Excellencies" are at gala parties all over town and their double-parked limos are boxed in. Even if they can convene, there are the mandatory pleasantries which must be observed. As the US finally presents its case, the first reports of casualties come in from Chicago.

Utter and complete nonsense! This quaint, 1945-era debating society has been left behind by events and technology just as the League was before it.

Schadow
_________________
Capt, 8th U.S. Army, Korea '53 - '54
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony54
PO2


Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 369
Location: cleveland, ohio

PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A CAN OF WORMS IS ABOUT TO OPEN!

Anything croocket and wicked eventually leads to WJC! And PIAPS.

Marc Rich pardoned why?

Read this, by ABC news no less!

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=295926&page=1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MSeeger
Seaman


Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 174
Location: Katy, TX

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But notice how quickly ABC is to bring the United States into this, Mark Rich notwithstanding...some of those suspects are big oil companies, and I'm sure, links will be found to the Bush family.

Sorry, I don't trust ABC as far as I can throw them. If they can find some way to link President Bush to this Oil for Food scandal...they will.

Maria
_________________
Be not deceived, God is not mocked, for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. Gal. 6:7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rurik
PO3


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 251
Location: Daschle-cleansed Free South Dakota

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As we have so often been told on this board "the high road gentlemen, always the high road." Diplomatic standard requires that we Persona no Grata them - the entire UN and give them 72 hours to clear the country. After which we arrest anyone still in this country - and considering the crush at JFK International, that's likely to be a lot of them.
_________________
Hating John Kerry continuously since 1971.

Essayons!
Fight Build and Destroy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
God and Country
PO3


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Posts: 274
Location: God's country

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 3:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Time to call in the Marabolo Man.
_________________
Conservative and proud
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
happyday
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 139
Location: Omaha, NE

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Awwww, can't we just send them all to Antartica? The seals would make a great listening audience, and can be taught to clap at anything! Cool
_________________
God Bless America, and God Bless the Swiftees!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beatrice1000
Resource Specialist


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1179
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:53 am    Post subject: US Amb to Un resigns... Reply with quote

Just noticed this: ** U.N. Ambassador John Danforth Resigns ** Says he wants to be at home with his wife... I hope we can get someone a bit tougher in there -- with perhaps a more empassioned feel for the job and a little more commitment to it -- especially now.

This article says a bit more: ** Danforth Resigns **
Quote:
...Danforth, who has been described as frustrated with the slow-moving U.N. bureaucracy, had recently told friends that he was running out of patience, especially with the Security Council, whose deliberations he considered difficult.... He campaigned vigorously to succeed Colin Powell as secretary of state... was described as disappointed when Bush picked ..Rice. ... The White House, meanwhile, was unhappy with some of positions Danforth, an ordained Episcopal minister, had taken at the United Nations, ..in particular his proposal that the agency create a committee on religion.

(Looks like we're better off without him.) It will be interesting to see who replaces him now and if they will be able to handle the "difficult" Security Council, a minor criteria for the job, I'd think.


Last edited by Beatrice1000 on Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:29 am; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stevie
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 1451
Location: Queen Creek, Arizona

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

they define immenent threat as 'when their enemy is about to screw up or expose your underhanded illegal dirty financial dealings with the terrorists'

has anyone told Kofi that Kerry DID NOT WIN ? The UN is not in charge of US !!!!
_________________
Stevie
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should
be arrested, exiled or hanged.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dcornutt
PO3


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Brooklyn, NY

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The UN definition of some situation that they can warrant military action against someone that threatens the US...is that someone that nobody else who sits on the UN security council or the UN itself has some financial interest in.

It has nothing to do with security, and as far as the US goes, they figure, we can either afford it...or take it. After all, what's a few dead americans? Makes the arabs happy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dcornutt
PO3


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Brooklyn, NY

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the UN is about controlling america.

NOt anybody else.

F em. Turn th e UN into a Ford or Chevy dealership.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arkadyfolkner
PO3


Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 271

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just wanna see GWB stand up and tell them off, kick them out, and roll the bulldozers at dawn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Knighthawk
Commander


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 323
Location: Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you are in the mood, contact some of the UN Officials

Mr. Kofi Annan
Secretary General
United Nations
New York, NY 10017 USA
212-963-5012
Email: ecu@un.org

UN phone number:(212) 963-4475

To email:

UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATION:

inquiries@un.org
webmaster@unhcr.ch
areca@unhcr.ch
unsco@palnet.com
ecu@un.org
coi@un.org
webadmin.hchr@unog.ch

Security council members:

france@un.int
Chinamission_un@fmprc.gov.cn
mexico@un.int
ang-un@angolamissionun.org
chile@un.int
contact@germany-un.org
Pakistan@un.int
spain@spainemb.org
rusun@un.int
usa@un.int
IPRD@mfa.government.bg
syria@un.int
Guinea@un.int
Cameroon@un.int
uk@un.int


Security Council Addresses:

S.E. Ambassador M. Jean-Marc de LA Sabliere
france-presse@un.int
FAX (212)207-9765

H.E. Ambassador Mr. Sergey Lavrov
rusun@un.int
FAX (212)628-0252

H.E. Ambassador Wang Yingfan
chinamission un@fmprc.gov.cn
FAX (212) 634-7626

H.E. Ambassador Sir Jeremy Greenstock
uk@un.int
FAX (212)745-9316

H.E. Ambassador Mr. Stefan Tafrov
bulgaria@un.int
FAX (212)472-9865

S.E. Ambassador Martin Belinga Eboutou
info@cameroonmission.org
FAX (212)249-0533

H.E. Ambassador M. Francois Lonseny Fall
guinea@un.int
FAX (212)687-8248

S.E. Embajador Adolfo Aguilar Zinser
mexico@un.int
FAX (212) 688-8862

H.E. Ambassador Dr. Mikha^Òil Wahbi
syria@un.int
FAX (212)983-4439

S.E. Ambassador Dr. Ismael Gaspar Martins
ang-un@angolamissionun.org
FAX (212) 861-9295

S.E. Ambassador Juan Gabriel Valdez
chile@un.int
FAX (212)832-0236

H.E.Ambassador Dr. Gunter Pleuger
contact@germany-un.org
FAX (212) 940-0402

H.E. Ambassador Inocencio F. Arias
spain@spainun.org
FAX (212) 682-4460

H.E. Ambassador Munir Akram
Pakistan@un.int
FAX (212) 744-7348
_________________
Regards,
Brian

Beware of the lollipop of mediocrity! Lick it once and you'll suck forever.

If guns kill people, then I can blame misspelled words on my pencil.

Knighthawk's Pictures!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mother
Former Member


Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 210

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6640316/
Danforth resigns
as U.N. ambassador
Ex-senator on the job only five months
John Danforth had been mentioned as a successor to Secretary of State Colin Powell, but he lost out to national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.

NBC, MSNBC and news services
Updated: 9:07 a.m. ET Dec. 3, 2004WASHINGTON - John Danforth has resigned as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations barely five months after he took office.

Danforth, 68, a Republican and former senator from Missouri, said in a letter to President Bush dated Nov. 22 that he and his wife wanted to return to St. Louis, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reported Thursday. He will leave by Jan. 20, when Bush is to be sworn in for a second term, said Richard Grenell, a spokesman for the U.S. delegation to the United Nations.

Danforth, who has been described as frustrated with the slow-moving U.N. bureaucracy, had recently told friends that he was running out of patience, especially with the Security Council, whose deliberations he considered difficult, Mitchell reported.

In a speech last month in St. Louis, Danforth said that as a former senator, he was not accustomed to having a policy statement vetted by State Department bureaucrats and transformed into “mush” before he could issue it. “It creates some practical problems,” he told alumni at Washington University.

Unhappiness seen as mutual
A senior State Department official said Danforth’s decision was not surprising. He campaigned vigorously to succeed Colin Powell as secretary of state and was described as disappointed when Bush picked national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.

The White House, meanwhile, was unhappy with some of the positions Danforth, an ordained Episcopal minister, had taken at the United Nations, the official said, in particular his proposal that the agency create a committee on religion.

Officials at the White House confirmed that one reason Bush did not promote Danforth was that he was seen as inflexible and “sanctimonious,” Mitchell reported. But he is widely respected in Washington, having been tapped by presidents of both parties as a troubleshooter.

Danforth was sworn in as ambassador to the United Nations on July 1, succeeding Bush’s first ambassador, John Negroponte, who became ambassador to Iraq.

He has commented little on corruption in the U.N. oil-for-food program, which some U.S. legislators have blamed on U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan. He said only that everyone hoped that investigations by the United Nations and congressional panels would bring out the truth.

NBC’s Andrea Mitchell and Tamara Kupperman in Washington and Linda Fasulo in New York and Reuters contributed to this report.



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6640786/
Text of Danforth’s resignation letterNBC News
Updated: 7:16 p.m. ET Dec. 2, 2004Following is the letter of resignation sent Nov. 22 by John Danforth, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. It was obtained Thursday by NBC News:

Dear Mr. President:

After a lot of thought and prayer, Sally and I have decided to return to private life, hopefully beginning January 20 2005.

I want you to know how much I appreciate the opportunity to serve the United States at the United Nations. It has been an important time to be in this position, especially as we attempt to enlist greater UN participation in the future of Iraq, and as we advance the interest you have personally shown in helping the desperate people of Sudan. I am proud to be part of your administration.

Forty-seven years ago, I married the girl of my dreams, and at this point in my life, what is most important to me is to spend more time with her. Because you know Sally, you know my reason for going home.

In your second administration, there may be occasions when I can serve you from St. Louis, as I did as your special envoy for peace in Sudan. If so, please do not hesitate to call. In the meantime, I hope you will always know that I am your friend.

Sincerely,

Jack Danforth

© 2004 MSNBC Interactive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PhantomSgt
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 972
Location: GUAM, USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 9:14 pm    Post subject: too easy. Reply with quote

arkadyfolkner wrote:
I just wanna see GWB stand up and tell them off, kick them out, and roll the bulldozers at dawn.


That is letting them off too easy folks. We need to let our Middle East Vets extract their "pound of flesh" for the UN putting them in harms way.

Line up two hundred 155s along 1st Avenue pointed towards the UN building. The CINC will give our Vets the order “fire for effect”.

Talk about a few “shots heard around the world”.

Twisted Evil

By the way we should let some of our so-called friends remain in the building.

Twisted Evil
_________________
Retired AF E-8

Independent that leans right of center.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mother
Former Member


Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 210

PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hot damn, Phantom. Glad I'm in this foxhole with you : )

Here. Gimmee some feedback, I'd love to hear what you think of this lovely video.

You can see the video directly at the hategun website. The MM site provided the link.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index.php
http://www.hategun.com/features/getoverit/index.html

Ever since George Bush was re-elected, conservatives have been telling liberals to "get over it." Excuse me? "Get over it?" This wasn't a baseball game. This wasn't the Super Bowl. We're not sobbing in our beers because the Steelers whipped the Packers.

We're at war. People's lives are at stake. Every day, families are being destroyed, both here and in Iraq. To treat this election so dismissively is an insult to them and to the soldiers who gave life and limb in this war.

Could Kerry have stopped the war? Probably not. But four more years of Bush ensures we'll have four more years of the sort of short-sighted global policy that got us into this mess in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group