|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tanya Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 570
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:50 pm Post subject: Schumer Confesses to Not Understanding Constitution |
|
|
By Henry Mark Holzer
FrontPageMagazine.com | July 27, 2005
"United States Senator “Chuck” Schumer’s broke his own stupidity record the other day following President Bush’s announcement of John Roberts nomination to the Supreme Court.
In a tag-team appearance with Senator Pat Leahy (D. Vt.), ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committee, Schumer confessed to the Nation that neither he, Leahy, nor the Democrat party for whom he spoke, understands a fundamental principle of American constitutionalism: separation of powers. Indeed, ever since Schumer confessed, his echo has been heard as Democrat functionaries (e.g., Kennedy, Biden, Durbin, Pelosi) have made the same confession that they, too, do not understand one of the three basic pillars upon which our Republic stands.
All of them, and for that matter most of the media, have been demanding that judicial nominee Roberts “answer questions.” That Roberts explain his position on abortion, that he reveal where he stands on affirmative action, that he disclose how he would rule on capital punishment, that he divulge his stand on eminent domain—that, in effect, he make known the platform on which he is running for a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States.
From the perspective of the Democrats, this is entirely understandable, even defensible—because they do not understand Separation of Powers, and thus the Constitution’s mandated role for a judge in the American system of government, believing instead that the judiciary is simply another political branch. The Democrats see judges—Warren, Brennan, Douglas, Blackmun, Stevens, Ginsburg—as legislators, promulgating from the bench their own social, economic, and even moral, programs, not interpreting the Constitution and laws passed by the politically accountable actual legislature, i.e., Congress."
more at link below:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=18914
found article at:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1451620/posts |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Uisguex Jack Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 Jul 2004 Posts: 613
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In this most macabre of senses.... this is funny.
Can I get my tax money refunded for every penny they have collected, collectively in their careers as members of the congress and senate?
For once I don't doubt the veracity of their statements.
I heard one of these nice fellows, two days back explain they needed the answers to Roberts position on abortion because if he was confirmed 'he would be making laws'????
A..... no he wouldn't. That's not his job.
Congress makes laws.
The Executive enforces laws.
The Judicial defines gray areas and contradictions of laws.
Is it no wonder these nice citizens try to win elections thru the courts? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rdtf CNO
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shouldn't they be required to take a test before running for office |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Armybrat/Armymom Commander
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 335 Location: Central Texas
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This past week (I think) I either heard a news story or read somewhere that there was a class being given for federal government employees who didn't have a clue about the U.S. Constitution. I also think this class included listening to patriotic music. I'm not sure if I heard it right or maybe I was in a fog that day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GM Strong Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 Posts: 1579 Location: Penna
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
A large number of Gummint employees now are there to meet diversity goals and numbers and not to meet any actual job function. They are products of some of the worst public schools and need remedial education. Schmucky Schumer needs the same. Actual Civics lessons in his youth somehow passed him by.
When one encounters a Gummint employee who is not a hack or knows something about their job, one tends to be astounded and grateful. They do exist, but are getting increasingly hard to find. _________________ 8th Army Korea 68-69 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deuce Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 589 Location: FL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:41 pm Post subject: Re: Schumer Confesses to Not Understanding Constitution |
|
|
Tanya,
Your favorite senators are wearing their stupidity records on their arms again.....Durbin, Kennedy especially so....today during the filibuster/debate on the 'torture amendment' to the Defense appropriations bill for the War on Terror...he's quoting Fischbach now on what constitues lawful interrogation of detainees, ie including 'death threats' etc. Looks like they're trying to get the Geneva Conventions to apply to the non uniformed terrorists. If they succeed, my recommendation is that our marines start wearing burkas so they can get 'closer shots' at our friends the terrorists....we know treatment that the islamofascists give our guys. Durbin is clearly attempting to immasculate the military again (and again, and again...etc). While some of our senators are simply admitting that the Congress has been AWOL (I agree) on some issues, our left leaning loonies in the Senate are using this agenda again to beat on our military...and ofcourse the irony is it's a McCain amendment (Talk about an agenda!)...so prolly Kerry is AWOL!
Deuce
All this crap is currently on CSpan2...gotta turn it off now 'fore I puke
Tanya wrote: | By Henry Mark Holzer
FrontPageMagazine.com | July 27, 2005
"United States Senator “Chuck” Schumer’s broke his own stupidity record the other day following President Bush’s announcement of John Roberts nomination to the Supreme Court.
In a tag-team appearance with Senator Pat Leahy (D. Vt.), ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committee, Schumer confessed to the Nation that neither he, Leahy, nor the Democrat party for whom he spoke, understands a fundamental principle of American constitutionalism: separation of powers. Indeed, ever since Schumer confessed, his echo has been heard as Democrat functionaries (e.g., Kennedy, Biden, Durbin, Pelosi) have made the same confession that they, too, do not understand one of the three basic pillars upon which our Republic stands. ...... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jwb7605 Rear Admiral
Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 690 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rdtf wrote: | shouldn't they be required to take a test before running for office |
They do. It's called "how stupid are these voters?" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 4:42 pm Post subject: Re: Schumer Confesses to Not Understanding Constitution |
|
|
Tanya wrote: |
From the perspective of the Democrats, this is entirely understandable, even defensible—because they do not understand Separation of Powers, and thus the Constitution’s mandated role for a judge in the American system of government, believing instead that the judiciary is simply another political branch. The Democrats see judges—Warren, Brennan, Douglas, Blackmun, Stevens, Ginsburg—as legislators, promulgating from the bench their own social, economic, and even moral, programs, not interpreting the Constitution and laws passed by the politically accountable actual legislature, i.e., Congress."
|
Sarcasm notwithstanding, they understand the original concept quite well. However, when you can't win ELECTIONS based on your politics, it mandates a Constitutional revisionist view that supports judicial activism.
This is a scary bunch and an even more frightening threat to our system of government. It is remarkable to me that even a body so plagued by Partisanship (that's with a capital "P") as the Congress would so placidly yield the Constitutional authority that was it's birthright to so ignoble an endeavor.
jwb7605 wrote: | Rdtf wrote: | shouldn't they be required to take a test before running for office |
They do. It's called "how stupid are these voters?" |
A fine retort, but it, IMHO, misses the underlying (and frightening) point. Judicial activism effectively neuters the political expression of "the will of the people" reflected in their selection of "legislators". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wwIIvetsdaughter Captain
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 513 Location: McAllen, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So much for the supertority of East Coast intelligensia. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jwb7605 Rear Admiral
Joined: 06 Aug 2004 Posts: 690 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 11:23 pm Post subject: Re: Schumer Confesses to Not Understanding Constitution |
|
|
Me#1You#10 wrote: |
<SNIP>
jwb7605 wrote: | Rdtf wrote: | shouldn't they be required to take a test before running for office |
They do. It's called "how stupid are these voters?" |
A fine retort, but it, IMHO, misses the underlying (and frightening) point. Judicial activism effectively neuters the political expression of "the will of the people" reflected in their selection of "legislators". |
Sorry to say that's only a semi-joking retort. The majority (I think) of politicians run on platforms at least implying, if not advocating outright, Judicial Activism. How they phrase things in their campaign speeches is quite often a function of how stupid they think the constituents are.
People ... especially those with a minority viewpoint ... frequently vote unknowingly in favor of Judicial Activism because, from their perspective, "that's what most people think and what's the way it ought to be". And, in fact, that's what most people in their small circle of friends do, indeed, think. For those people, Judicial Activism is not Judicial Activism.
I'm frequently surprised by the number of people who take an issue on grounds the issue "is a Constitutional right". Then, when an activist Judge rules in favor of their (mistaken) viewpoint, the nonexistent "Constitutional right" becomes de facto: "separation of Church and State" and "Abortion Rights" are two that come immediately to mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
USAFE5 PO2
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 362 Location: Reno Nevada
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I saw Judge Judy on Larry King (the remote button stuck) and I actually agreed with Judge Judy. All persons who desire to be judges should go to school for that - BEFORE THEY ARE APPOINTED - not the little course on procedure they currently are required to attend after the appointment. If you can't pass the course you don't get to be a judge. And the course relates to the type of law you will be judging - criminal, family,etc. and for each new court you must take the courses for that one as well.
Unfortunately we can't get something like this for our elected representatives either. _________________ "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I’m here to help." Ronald Reagan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|